<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, amanda congdon]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, amanda congdon]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/amandacongdon http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/amandacongdon <![CDATA[A Museum-Ready Collection of Videobloggers]]> Remember when Amanda Congdon was rocketing to the top? Yeah, me neither. Videoblogging's forgotten stars.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5223163&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Twitterati Scrape Off a Blueprint Cleanse Stain]]> Feeling out of it? Then go read what media types like Amanda Congdon and Sarah Lacy are saying about themselves on Twitter. You'll feel better instantly!

D.C. videoblogger Andy Carvin rendered himself unfit for the camera.

Chicago Tribune reporter Wailin Wong discovered that magical Susan Boyle singing clip.

Formerly relevant Web-video personality Amanda Congdon made progress in her quest to become a crazy cat lady.

Wired.com's Priya Ganapati hit up a Twitter user as a source. And another. And another.

TechCrunch contributor Sarah Lacy displayed the toxic aftereffects of exposure to Julia Allison.

Did you witness the media elite tweet something indiscreet? Please email us your favorite tweets — or send us more Twitter usernames.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5212193&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Twitter Spits on Cold Racists]]> The Twitterati did not have a good day. Professional web personality Amanda Congdon hates racists, crackpot visionary Jeff Jarvis still hates the media, but TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington is hated most of all!

TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington, who believes Europeans are too lazy to found startups, experienced drooling contempt at the DLD conference in Munich.

Vaguely employed videoblogger Amanda Congdon concluded that L.A. is full of racists.

Macworld editor Kelly Turner froze in San Francisco.

BusinessWeek's Amy Feldman thought about the children.

Media critic Jeff Jarvis criticized the media.

Anyone else's tweets we should keep an eye on? Send us more Twitter usernames, please.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5140513&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[A Vile Day for the Twitterati]]> Was it the sad news of Steve Jobs's ailments? Or just bad fish-oil capsules? Something was off in the Twittersphere today.

Formerly famous podcaster Amanda Congdon kept it classy for another one of her forgettable post-Rocketboom projects.

Wall Street Journal gadget columnist Walt Mossberg got so distraught over Steve Jobs's health problems he couldn't type straight.

And like Jobs, Guardian writer Jemima Kiss overshared her digestive problems.

Blogueuse Ana Marie Cox, the former Wonkette, maintained her standards.

Vaguely employed gossipmonger Bonnie Fuller tried to make "cutes" a word.

Anyone else's tweets we should keep an eye on? Send us their username.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5131754&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How daddy's money paid for Andrew Baron's Rocketboom]]> Here's a story far more interesting than anything you'll watch on YouTube: A prodigal scion of a wealthy family, pitted against his powerful father and an ambitious blonde. It's not a pilot for a new courtroom procedural — it's the tale of Andrew Baron's Rocketboom, an online-video startup held up, inexplicably, as an example of the potential of the medium. Sony's seven-figure deal to distribute Rocketboom is seen by some as evidence that the industry is growing up. But what it really tells us is that having access to a credit line backed by Daddy is as sure a recipe for success online as it was in the old Hollywood. The exciting plot twist: Baron's father was not always happy about the arrangement. We've only learned how daddy-dependent Rocketboom was because Fred Baron loaned his son's company a total of $810,300.40, and then took it to court in order to force repayment last year. If you think it's strange for a father to go after his own son's company in court, then you don't know the elder Baron.

He's a leading Dallas attorney who even sued the firm he cofounded, Baron & Budd, and is a regular on blog Overlawyered. More interesting is that Amanda Congdon intervened in order to protect her claim on part of the company. Meanwhile, the younger Baron complains all this legal wrangling tied his dealmaking hands, and that the company nearly went broke twice this year.

The Rocketboom episode neatly explains why the world of online video so resembles film school, a parent-funded enterprise of self-indulgent auteurs with macroambitions viewed by microaudiences (including yours truly). Sony's deal doesn't affirm the potential of online video as a means of creative expression; it simply tells us that the rich, despite themselves, can't help getting richer. (Photos by Eric Skiff and Alex de Carvalho)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5033448&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Playboy wants top blogger to pose topless]]>
The whole Xeni Jardin / Violet Blue thing continues to backfire on us. A female editor at Playboy.com alerted us to a "Who's the Web's hottest blogger"? contest they thought up after ogling last week's photos of the two cozied-up lady bloggers. The prize? Playboy will offer the winner a "topless or nude" photo shoot for their site. I fact-checked it with them, and let's be clear: Topless, nude, or forget it. The contestants are Jardin and Blue, plus Julie Alexandra, Veronica Belmont, Amanda Congdon, Brigitte Dale, Sarah Lacy, Sarah Austin and Natali Del Conte. I know what you're thinking: Good luck getting the winner to take it off. As a former Playboy reader (many of the articles are good) I wish they'd asked around first. It'd be easy to solicit nine very photogenic girlbloggers eager to claim the prize. Who'll be #1? Right now the obscure-but-well-shot Brigitte Dale is ahead, but I expect Veronica Belmont's Gadgetboy Army to mobilize today and sweep her to a decisive win — and a decisive NO. Sarah Austin sums up her cognitive dissonance: "Not sure how I feel about being in Playboy's popularity contest. Maybe I'd feel better if I was winning?"

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023892&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Vanity Fair displays new media acumen with "Blogopticon"]]>

In a wonderful piece of linkbait, Vanity Fair produced an illustration featuring a number of popular "blogs" arranged in a cartesian graph from "Scurrolous" to "Earnest" on one axis and "Opinion" to "News" on another. While we're trying to grasp how the 'Wag ended up on the earnest side of the scale, more confusing is the inclusion of Salon and Slate. Apparently, if you're not printed on paper, you're a "blog" — even though both publications predate the term. But where the chart really gets things wrong is in using the disembodied head of Amanda Congdon to illustrate online video program Rocketboom. If the authors or illustrator actually watched the show or read many of the listed blogs, they'd know that Joanne Colan took over as host after a very nasty and public departure from the show by Congdon. Keep trying, guys, you're bound to figure out this Internet thing eventually!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5016434&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Host Joanne Colan Leaves Rocketboom]]> According to a source at the Creative Artists Agency, host Joanne Colan is leaving Rocketboom, one of the Internet's first prominent news videoblogs. During her tenure, Colan never managed to transform the show (directed by creator Andrew Baron) from a quirky but inscrutable cult favorite into a mainstream online news source. (See for yourself below by watching today's weird episode.) Nor did she achieve the same web fame as her predecessor Amanda Congdon, who left a job with ABCNews.com last year.

No news yet on whether Baron will try to hire a third host for his show, which would mean the show had as many hosts as it's had paying advertisers.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=393548&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Amanda Congdon returns to Web video with video on Web about Web video]]>
Videoblogger Amanda Congdon, who was once famous on the Internet for being famous on the Internet, has returned from a noncareer at ABC and an as-yet invisible development deal with HBO to introduce Sometimesdaily.com, a series of Web videos about, as far as we can tell, making Web videos. At least Rocketboom, on which Congdon's bosom won her many fans, was about something, though we can't quite remember what.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=386836&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The triumphant nonreturn of Amanda Congdon]]> Thank goodness! Just a day after our missing-persons alert on former videoblogger Amanda Congdon, she turned up on her blog with a 794-word entry she's been working on for a month. Here's a version she could have fit in a Twitter: "I'm going daily on a new videoblog in 2008. I'm in pre-production for the new project now." More Amanda, coming to you live in less than 11 months!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=359886&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Whatever happened to Amanda Congdon?]]> We are growing concerned. After her career as an ABC nonjournalist fizzled, the formerly famous, generously-racked host of Rocketboom has been absent from her own blog since November 27. An "under development "show with HBO has gone nowhere. On January 23, Congdon Twittered that she was "writing monster blog post reflecting on ABC and talking about what's next." Amanda, 28 days is more time than even Scoble puts into a post. Just press Publish, ok?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=359352&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Valleywag's 25 predictions for 2008]]> Valleywag is of course known for its dead-on accuracy, so our predictions for 2008 need no introduction. Inside, my 25 predictions (made without inside information) cover the futures of Facebook, Google, Digg, YouTube, Twitter, the Wall Street Journal, Apple, Yahoo, Gawker Media, AOL, Dell, LOLcats, the president, and more.

  1. Facebook stays independent and private, strikes a meaningful deal that legitimizes its business plan, and buys a startup.
  2. Born out of the writers' strike, at least one "Funny or Die" style site gets big buzz and maybe even gets bought, but it fails to produce any videos near the quality of FoD or Super Deluxe.
  3. Google releases some limited version of voice search beyond GOOG 411. During the year, the company's stock tops $800.
  4. Digg sells to a major media company for at least $200 million, and founder Kevin Rose starts a non-web-based company.
  5. YouTube announces it's adding HD video, but the feature doesn't arrive until 2009.
  6. Gawker Media, publisher of this site, starts a men's site and a Web show.
  7. Yahoo suffers major layoffs, leading the press to dub it the next AOL.
  8. Yet AOL is spun off and reframes itself. At the end of 2008, the company's future is still uncertain.
  9. Apple releases a second-generation iPhone, and at least one New York Times article tries to draw a "middle class/rich" line between those who upgrade and those who stick with the first generation.
  10. A new videoblogger emerges as the go-to example for slick independent daily vlogging, following Amanda Congdon and Ze Frank.
  11. Tumblr, the pared down blogging service, enjoys the popularity that 2007 brought Twitter.
  12. Twitter remains independent and spins off a new service.
  13. The Internet again fails to drive one presidential candidate to success. So does Chuck Norris.
  14. Jason Calacanis, still running his online directory Mahalo, starts another project.
  15. A new meme started in a geeky part of the web infiltrates the "normal" population even more deeply than LOLcats.
  16. Yet another e-book reader comes out and no one cares.
  17. Blog search engine Technorati collapses after failing to get enough funding to stay afloat.
  18. The Wall Street Journal announces it will soon be free online.
  19. Blog platform maker Six Apart, having spun off LiveJournal and rearranged its exec staff, gets bought.
  20. Dell screws up the good will it won in 2007 with another customer-service or bad-parts scandal.
  21. Net Neutrality takes another hit from a telco-friendly Congressional bill.
  22. Second Life plods along.
  23. The TechCrunch blog network lands a regular TV appearance, if not a show.
  24. The country tires of the last round of famous-for-being-famous celebs, and gossip blogger Perez Hilton's TV show gets cancelled.
  25. A minor medical incident renews the "can Apple survive without Steve Jobs" argument.
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=336980&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Rocketboom creator takes on Calacanis]]> Jason Calacanis's human-powered search engine Mahalo is "fundamentally flawed," says videoblogger Andrew Baron. Well, we could have told you that: It's basically Yahoo's directory, 12 years too late. But Baron, best known for creating Rocketboom, trashed Calacanis's service not for its lack of originality, but for its lack of critical applause. "Mahalo is not a worthwhile product," Baron wrote, "I have never seen a single positive review of the site." What's got the guy so worked up?

In his post, Baron gripes about Calacanis's "aggressive marketing tactics" to promote Mahalo Daily, the site's videoblog with former CNET host Veronica Belmont. But in a reply to Baron's attacks, Calacanis guesses the antipathy stems from Calacanis's public attempt to hire Amanda Cogdon after she quit Rocketboom.

Yeah, it could be that. Or it could be that in Mahalo Daily's launch trailer, Calacanis and Belmont parodied "Rocketboom" on Mahalo Daily and Calacanis said, "Hm. Been thinking about it. Rocketboom just isn't that funny."

There's only one way to resolve this, of course. No, not a catfight between Belmont and Rocketboom anchor Joanne Colan, pervs. Instead: Bulldog love!

Bulldogs.jpg

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=322533&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Amanda Congdon bounces back with best video ever]]>
Vlog hottie Amanda Congdon has posted her best video in months — maybe ever. The fact that it's an ad-libbed outtake that could never be featured on a major news network just goes to show that she was never meant for ABC. Maybe her rumored project with the relatively uncensored HBO will work out after all. Of course, I'm still laughing too hard to admit that I'm ignoring some key problems.

There's the fact that it's an old joke. That it's mostly humorous because Congdon is usually incapable of humor. That I laughed because she is defying her image as a vacuous, uninteresting shill attempting to make her way in the world of "legitimate journalism." That lightning doesn't strike twice. On second thought, who knows what the future will hold for Amanda Congdon? All I know is that if it looks anything like this, I'm wishing the videoblogger all the luck in the world.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=304995&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Anarchic headline-discussion site Fark's...]]> Anarchic headline-discussion site Fark's predictably juvenile — if completely on target — take on a videoblogger's departure from mainstream TV: "Amanda Congdon and her world-class breasts are gone from ABC.com" [Fark]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=302567&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Amanda Congdon's ABC rocket goes boom!]]> ABC has finally realized that popular, busty, vacuous Internet anchorwomen do not translate into popular, busty, vacuous television anchors. The network is severing its one-year relationship with Amanda Congdon, who shot to Internet fame hosting the videoblog Rocketboom. So what now?


ABC can dismiss the failure as an experiment:

It's been a great year with Amanda — a great experiment for both of us. We thank her for her many contributions and know that she's about to embark on new endeavors and expect there will be times in the future that we can again work together.
The TV network learned a simple lesson: Quirky Internet success does not equal mainstream-media succcess. And frankly, ABC is likely as much to blame as Congdon; it failed to pick up some of Rocketboom's key interactive elements, while Congdon failed to make more of her sporadic appearances on ABC shows like Good Morning America.

One thing we can count on: Congdon will bounce back, perky as ever. She has a show in development for HBO — technically, according to HBO's advertising, that's "not television," so we don't know if that will count as a TV comeback. And she seems to have a burgeoning if ethically questionable career as a spokesblogger for advertisers like DuPont and American Express. The only question: Will anyone care? Or has her audience, like ABC, tired of her "experiments"?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=302481&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Internet People]]> From Amanda Congdon to Tay Zonday — virtually every inane, pop culture Internet video "star" of the last few years who have made YouTube indispensable to millions of... Internet People! Depicted in Flash animation in under three minutes by Dan Meth, music by Dan Meth and Micah Frank.]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=299567&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ABC's Net videos redefine the selling of the president]]>
Anyone naive enough to believe that online video would democratize, and thereby improve, political discussion in America has been deservedly disappointed. In the recent presidential debates, instead of submitting questions by email — last decade's fad — Internet users were asked to vlog in their queries to the candidates. The results, far from being unpredictable and populist, were as scripted as any TV show.

The YouTube/CNN debate delivered sophomoric (but stereotypical YouTube) softballs. And any remaining hopes were dashed by the Iowa Republican debate hosted by ABC's George Stephanopoulos. The Disney-owned network, like YouTube, implemented user voting in its video-submission process. And, predictably, the result was more "America's Funniest Home Videos" than New England Town Hall. ABC adroitly crafted its call for citizen submissions to market its televised event, not raise the level of political discourse.

If you followed the marketing hype around ABC's debate, you may have believed that video questions submitted by everyday people would be central to the broadcast and that the popularly chosen submissions would be selected. Instead, only two videos were used, neither of them top-rated. Zennie Abraham accused the network of "vlogger fraud," describes one of the lucky two as "the typical, predictable, stereotypical blonde white female that a TV producer would select." (Ironically, Abraham then turned around and suggested ABC pick typical, predictable, stereotypical blonde white female Amanda Congdon to run the debate instead.)

Of course, a close reading of ABC's actual call for submissions should have warned Abraham and company of what to expect:

We encourage you, your family, colleagues & friends to vote/rate favorite questions & the highest rated videos will be a factor in George Stephanopoulos' decision and also have the opportunity to be featured in ABC News NOW's post-debate Spin room!
No promise that submissions will be included in the debate or that votes will actually matter.

And why would anyone think otherwise? The networks have long known that hard-hitting questions and articulate, thoughtful responses don't make for good TV. Or, for that matter, win debates. But exploiting the vlogger community? That makes for excellent pre-debate buzz. The fact that the vlogging community was taken in, and is now up in arms, just shows how clever ABC's marketing team is.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=286413&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Future of journalism now shilling American Express on a fake trolley]]> [UPDATE BELOW]What's up with the bubbly former host of Rocketboom, which was supposed to be the Internet's first huge news show before it leveled off? According to the London Times, Amanda Congdon's show for ABC News is "currently in the world's top 40,000 blogs," which puts it somewhere below great-soups-ive-eaten.blogspot.com. But Congdon has always been proud of her second career as a host for corporate stunt videos, and she recently starred in an American Express ad (shown below) shot in San Francisco. It's for a good cause, in a way: AmEx is giving away up to $5 million for a world-improving project to be selected by its customers. Metaphor-makers rejoice: The "cable car" carrying journotainer Amanda through the city in this video is a fake. Okay, okay, a "replica."

Bring on the endorsements indeed.

UPDATE: Consumerist.com says that AmEx's project is getting hijacked by Proctor and Gamble, who entered a project of their own for this $5 million contest. The "Children's Safe Drinking Water" project would be enacted by UNICEF, and guess what corporation sells water purification systems.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=284629&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Amanda Congdon Wearing Media Hat Today]]> ABC and Dupont brand Amanda Congdon addresses some salient issues concerning the Virginia Tech tragedy:

You know, when I first heard about the shooting on TV in my hotel room at NAB, I turned to Mario and said "why does this always seem to happen this week in April?" Turns out, at least according to this blogger, that the beginning of spring marks "school shooting season". [sic] Do we, the media, have a responsibility to tone down coverage of these horrific events so as not to motivate copycats?
Excellent question, Racky! (For a high school journalism class, at least.) But isn't that what new media is all about? Breaking the rules? Setting your own? It's confusing these days.

Top 5 [Amanda Congdon]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=253942&view=rss&microfeed=true