<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, bill gross]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, bill gross]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/billgross http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/billgross <![CDATA[Sequoia clones unsuccessful search engine — maybe Google will buy it anyway]]> Searchmevideothumb.jpgSequoia partner Mark Kvamme just plunked down $31 million on a company he also chairs, called Searchme. It's an image-based search engine. Search is a crowded field but Searchme CEO Randy Adams thinks there's room for innovation. "Search," he told BoomTown, "is still largely a text and list experience." True, but Snap CEO Tom McGovern told me almost the exact same thing in May 2006. Didn't work out for him. Now Snap is a site for bloggers. Below, a video demonstration of Searchme's "innovation" and another video showing two-year-old Snap doing pretty much the same things.

Searchme may remind some of Apple's iTunes Cover Flow feature, but if it's more likely to succeed than Snap that's not why. Snap was search-ad innovator Bill Gross's brainchild. Good genes. But Searchme's Sequioa roots are better. Sequioa funded Google, which is known to return the favor from time to time.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=366502&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Why Demo's conference beat TechCrunch40]]> Techdirt, the ever-opinionated analysis blog, has weighed in and found Demo's lineup of startups and new products more compelling than last week's TechCrunch40. Why? Mike Masnick doesn't come out and say it, but his implication is clear: Unlike the parade of Web 2.0 one-note-Johnnies drummed up by TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington and entrepreneur Jason Calacanis, most of experienced Demo organizer Chris Shipley's picks were focused on useful improvements to existing technology, not gimmicky new ideas. Arrington and Calacanis launched TechCrunch40 because they felt that it was somehow wrong for conferences to charge startups to present. Nonsense, of course. I think that the fact that Demo charges presenters — reportedly $18,500 apiece — was actually what makes it a stronger event.

Remember when Bill Gross launched the search engine GoTo.com, later Overture, and shocked the industry by ranking listings by how much advertisers were willing to pay? At the time, his pay-per-click model was ripped apart as cynical and sleazy. But paid search ads, it turns out, were the right idea. The willingness of an advertiser to pay, among other factors, was actually a useful criterion for determining whether an ad might be effective, and it's a practice that's making billions of dollars for Google.

I think there's a similar effect here. There was no downside for TechCrunch40's presenting companies; if they gave a lousy presentation, all they wasted was the audience's time. One of the best-received startups was MusicShake. Note that MusicShake is based in South Korea, which means that its founders flew across the Pacific to make their debut, at considerable expense. They may not have paid Calacanis and Arrington anything, but unlike most of their peers, they actually had skin in the game.

Contrast that to the sloppy demos given by some Bay Area startuppers who only had to roll out of bed to get there — and looked like they just had.

By contrast, every company at Demo had some money at stake. It might not have been a big risk, but it was enough to make them take the event seriously. Shipley told me earlier this week:

Demo is involved in helping companies launch their products, and there are costs associated with that. That doesn't remove the hurdle of qualifying and being selected to participate. The fee is a commitment for a small company. It does signal a seriousness of intent — it is a bit of a bar for a company, and if you're able to clear that hurdle, that means that there's more at stake and the company is perhaps more viable.
Exactly right, of course. (More's the pity for the companies that tried to two-time Demo and got kicked out.)

The irony is that when I reported that DemoPit, TechCrunch40's for-pay sideshow that required startups to buy a ticket to the event, Calacanis blusteringly defended his event along much the same lines as Shipley, citing the costs of putting it on. Of course. But by making startups share those costs, Shipley is putting the invisible hand of capitalism to work as a useful sorting function. You know her companies won't waste your time. Why? They have money on the line.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=304838&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Remainders: A healthy career in Chinese gold farming]]> jobs-again.jpg Now playing World of Warcraft can get you a job. Thrilling, really, to discover that a game played by destroying arbitrarily assigned enemies ad infinitum, rising up a ladder until reaching a disappointing top that isn't a top at all, commiserating with socially inept addicts with little life outside the computer, could prepare you for tech work. No, seriously, I am shocked at this news. [Wired]
It's funny 'cause it's petty: Just as Microsoft pushes Vista to 2007 and shuffles the whole Live department, MSN goes down for an hour. [Threadwatch]
AT&T doesn't really want to break your Internet. Sure, that's what it says while it's sober. [ZDNet]
Google Finance doesn't just disappoint Yahoo blogger (and "Expert Author") Jeremy Zawodny, it makes him sad. Jeremy comes this close to naming the folks who let Yahoo Finance rot, then praises the product manager in charge of Google Finance. "Not speaking for my employer" indeed. [WebProNews]
Idealab shareholders agree to pay founder Bill Gross's $50 million loan. And now he can't have that puppy he asked for, because that was the agreement about responsibility, Bill, and for now you can only keep your goldfish. [LA Times]
Songbird plays a good game of gotcha. Steve Jobs in 2002: "If you legally acquire music, you need to have the right to manage it on all other devices that you own." France fighting iTunes in 2006: "The consumer must be able to listen to the music they have bought on no matter what platform." Oh, they couldn't mean it the way he did, they're just the French. [Songbird]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=162678&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Vindicated: Bill Gross still broke]]> Idealab CEO Bill Gross scored board approval to make shareholders take over his $50 million personal loan. If shareholders approve, Bill will pay back the cash over the next four years (or find a new sucker to buy the loan). The jet's sold, the Ferrari's sold, but Bill must have some tchotchkes left to make a $50-mil yard sale.

By the way, congrats to the L.A. Times for catching up to Valleywag's March 7 post.

Slope-shouldered photo source: David Strick [davidstrick.com]
Downsized and in Debt, Idealab Chief Still Pitching [LAT]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=162046&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Is Bill Gross broke again?]]> bill-gross.jpgAnother would-be Valleywagger does our job for us, with a report that Bill Gross, CEO of Pasadena business incubator Idealab, is still paying for his sins during the dot-com bubble — or, well, his shareholders are.

Is Bill Gross broke again? Gross and Idealab became the icon for the internet bubble riding the crest up and then way down, ultimately resulting in a billion dollar lawsuit in 2000 by shareholders who claimed misuse of funds and other improprieties by Gross. The hangover from that time is apparently not over.

Shareholders of Idealab last week received a Proxy from the Idealab Board of Directors asking them to approve Idealab buying out Bill Gross $50M loan from Bank of America. Gross apparently borrowed the money in 1999 to fund his lifestyle, including buying a house, a plane and Idealab stock. Now according to the Proxy he can t afford to pay it back.

You might ask how the Idealab BOD throws common sense and accepted corporate governance out the window in proposing such a transaction. The justification given in the Proxy centers around the claim of Gross invaluable and irreplaceable ideas and business leadership.

Kind of humorous when coupled with the fact that Idealab raised over a billion dollars and now according to the Proxy is worth only about $300M. That is quite a negative IRR.

And rumors from VC s and entrepreneurs in Idealab companies persist of how difficult Bill and his wife Marcia, who happens to be President of Idealab, are to work with. The most common used phrase is family run business , and it s not used in the kindest sense. Also insiders say that due to the financial distress Idealab won t be incubating any new companies until they can get some liquidity events to pay off Bill s debt.

Photo: David Strick Photography [DavidStrick.com]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=159011&view=rss&microfeed=true