<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, bubble]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, bubble]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/bubble http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/bubble <![CDATA[The Valley's private equity hype]]> It's late, I'm tired and the coffee is wearing off, so I'm happy that Paul Kedrosky takes a stab at deciphering the latest quarterly report on Bay Area venture capital activity from Fenwick & West:

So, higher asset prices on fewer transactions, and no clarity on how many are inside deals? That sounds familiar. What could it be? Hmmm. Gosh, it sounds like the dying days of the real estate bubble, circa late 2006.

(Photo by Annie Lawry) [Infectious Greed]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5038581&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[GOOG shares hit their highest price ever...]]> GOOG shares hit their highest price ever today, reaching $560.70 at one point this afternoon, bringing Google's market cap up to $175 billion. [San Jose Mercury News]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=302530&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Amazon.com shares are up 27 percent to $87.79,...]]> Harry Potter and the Deathly Refunds. [Tech Trader Daily]]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=282438&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Opsware, Marc Andreessen's boring but modestly...]]> Yahoo Finance]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=269376&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Dear bubble veterans: We get it. Now shut up, you're harshing our buzz.]]> NICK DOUGLAS — To everyone who was "there for the first bubble," let me speak on behalf of those of us who weren't (and those who were and don't need to keep yammering about it. We get it. You're old and experienced and SO OVER this retro fad called making money off the Internet. Now shut up and let us make some.

Let's be clear who I'm talking to. It's those of you who were in Silicon Valley or (better) New York's Silicon Alley and took part in the dot-com boom, and you know all about how stupid it was, everyone running with the bulls, though you've no explanation for why, then, you ran along with the rest of the fatheaded tourists and watched your friends get gored. You're the ones who KNOW that every startup will fail, that MySpace was a waste of News Corp's cash, that no one makes money off a wiki. Any time one of the rest of us mentions an obvious, actual waste of money (PodTech anyone?), you treat it as proof that the whole industry is doomed for collapse.

I was one of you, sure. For about half a freaking year. It didn't take me long to realize I was dead wrong about the fate of YouTube. And I was never so blind as to write off the Flickrs and Jotspots and Diggs of the world as anything REMOTELY resembling Pets.com.

You pissers, you know why you're here talking to us? Because you fucked it up. You didn't get your piece of the pie before the bubble was out, and now all the time you WOULD have spent throwing your money around, you instead spend on the free pursuit of comparing everything to "the last time."

And you know what that doesn't do? It doesn't make everyone who just moved into town go "Oops, guess my hopes and ambitions are for naught, and the future can only repeat the past! Thank you oh sir for you deep wisdom of TEN WHOLE YEARS! Teach me sensei, that I may also piss on the achievements of others!"

No, what it does is make all of us feel like the Big Lebowski, the Dude, shouting "God Walter, why is everything a travesty with you?" New adventures are happening around you and you can only deal with it by comparing it to 'Nam! You're whiny Walter Sobchak, muttering "calmer'n you are" after waving a gun around the bowling alley. But this has nothing to do with 'Nam.

Or you're like Uncle Whatever in Napoleon Dynamite, reminiscing about how great you COULD have been if you hadn't torn a tendon or quit before you vested or whatever the hell bad decision or accident you blame for your pitiful washed-up existence. And what do you do to change that around? You sell Tupperware. You buy a time machine off the Internet. You putz around at OUR conferences and OUR geek dinners and you titter at all the people with the guts to try and fail.

Well you go do that, and we'll laugh with you about our silly startups named Twitter and Meebo and our arrogant videoblogging community and Justin.tv, who may be a dick, but he's OUR dick. We'll laugh. We'll laugh all the way to the billion-dollar buyout. And when the dust settles and it's time to make the fuck-you money say "fuck you," we'll see who looks stupid.

Nick Douglas writes for Valleywag, Blogebrity, and Look Shiny. He's looking for angel funding and a Jack and ginger ale. Photo: Scott Beale, Laughing Squid

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=249065&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Economic indicator: Engineering talent going freelance]]> Are we in a bubble yet? One indicator: When there's a lot of demand for talent, the smartest talent goes freelance, because there's no upper limit to what you can charge when you're a consultant. Open-source programming guru Nat Torkington notes that many of his techy friends have done just that, presumably in search of $300 per hour IT consulting fees.. The flipside: when contractors start heading for the security of regular jobs, watch out.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=231871&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Good News, The Bubble is Over]]> The NY Times took a break from glad handling Google to report after 10 years in business, the massive server farm Internap Network Services finally posted two whole quarters of profit. Congrats on not getting delisted from NASDAQ!

[NY Times]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=209950&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Remainders: I like it when you call me Bigdaddy]]> big_foever.jpg Google's new infrastructure, now rolling out, is named Bigdaddy. No comment needed. [Matt Cutts]
Bubble's back, babe. [Techdirt]
CBS proves its loyalty to Google Video. [LA Times]
Okay, so Robert Scoble was the "big-name blogger" who wanted his evil back — turns out he even blogged it. The pain of discovering this scoop's old age was mollified by the discovery of Google: Evil or Not? [EvilorNot]
Linus Torvalds joins the "Sliding Scale of Evil" movement [CNet]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=152748&view=rss&microfeed=true