<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, charlie rose]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, charlie rose]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/charlierose http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/charlierose <![CDATA[Google's Marissa Mayer Pities Yahoo]]> Why is Marissa Mayer, Google's athletically inept cupcake princess, going on such a publicity tour of late? She was in the Times Sunday. Last night, she hit Charlie Rose to make excuses for not innovating.

Mayer is in charge of Google's core search engine, which was famed for its incredibly rapid innovation ten years ago. But now? The 20,000-person Internet conglomerate has become as glacial in its development as Microsoft or IBM. For example: When will be able to search the words spoken in YouTube videos? "Five years, maybe ten," says Mayer. And searching images? "Ten years, maybe fifteen." When did Google become a company where that pace of invention was tolerable? Perhaps around the same time Mayer started dabbling dilletantishly at cross-country skiing and marathon running, where she's consistently placed in the back fo the pack.

And yet Mayer is pityingly dismissive of Google's main competition, Yahoo, saying they've "lost a lot of good people." When Rose presses on whether she'd want to see Microsoft buy Yahoo — a move which would arguably strengthen the combined entity's search market share, she demurs. "We really think an independent Yahoo's better for the Web," says Mayer. Translation: She wants a Yahoo that's providing just enough competition to keep Washington's antitrust cops off of Google's back — but not enough that Google might have to innovate at a pace faster than 10, maybe 15 years.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5165778&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Charlie Rose on Charlie Rose on the Internet, by Samuel Beckett]]> RoseOnRoseThumb.jpgOver the years, Charlie Rose has hosted Silicon Valley titans like Wired editor Chris Anderson, Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos, and Google cofounder Sergey Brin on his late-night public television interview show. When Facebook launched its Beacon advertising program in New York, Rose played master of ceremonies. But not until now, with the discovery of this clip titled "'Charlie Rose' by Samuel Beckett," has Rose effectively explicated the industry.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=382090&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Michael Arrington: Gossip blogs are a "trainwreck"]]> Charlie Rose brought the man he called "kingmaker of new technology startups" onto his show last week. The kingmaker told Rose that tech gossip blogs like Valleywag —ok he didn't actually name us, but we knew who he was talking about — are a "trainwreck." Quote: "Silicon Valley, I believe, we're all geeks. We're not ready for this kind of attention where, literally, people are taking pictures of the inside of your house." But then why did we invent the camera phone?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=365964&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Back when Barry Diller was full of bright ideas]]> The argument goes that IAC chairman Barry Diller is battling with John Malone over control of the company because he's never been the visionary he claims to be. Odd. He certainly seemed like one back in 1999. That's when he appeared on Charlie Rose to explain why his company, then called USA Networks, tried to acquire Lycos for $20 billion. Check out the clip. Nine years ago, Diller nailed the Internet. Though maybe not the Lycos deal.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=357036&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Kindle's true origin in 18th century French Enlightenment?]]> I know I'm not the only one thinking Amazon.com's e-book reader Kindle sounds more like kindling, something that should be burned, rather than something that ignites ideas and revolutions — a problem that a good naming myth, well told, will not easily overcome. Fortunately for Bezos, Charlie Rose can't help but interrupt his guests and provide the answers to his own questions. In an interview, the CEO fumbled through the origin of the e-book reader's name. But why is Jeff Bezos completely failing to tell the true, compelling, and literary origins of the Kindle name?

Kindle's definition "to ignite" is straightforward enough, but starting fires in the context of books? Fahrenheit 451, maybe, and we're hardly the first to point that out. But there just happens to be a famous quote using kindle and books in the same context that states exactly Bezos's vision ... by the 18th century philosopher and satirist François-Marie Arouet, better known as Voltaire:

The instruction we find in books is like fire. We fetch it from our neighbors, kindle it at home, communicate it to others, and it becomes the property of all.
Certainly, this quote could have inspired the name. Wouldn't Amazon be better served by invoking the highly-esteemed and quotable philosopher as the inspiration for their device in explaining Kindle to its literary audience? At least they'd have someone else to blame ... and a dead guy who wrote a lot of books, at that.

So why no Voltaire tributes? Either Amazon wanted to avoid associating the only-available-in-America device with the hated French, or Jeff Bezos hoped to keep all of the credit to himself. I'll assume the latter, and blame Bezos for the awkwardly named Kindle.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=327660&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bezos predicts demise of books, return of Charles Dickens]]>
Amazon.com CEO and firestarter Jeff Bezos sat down to Charlie Rose's table last night. There, Bezos predicted Amazon's new e-reader Kindle will in the near future lead to new forms of art — like serial novels! — and render books made from "dead trees" as relics for "cabinets of curiosity." Bezos also gets in a characteristic maniacal laugh or two. Rose impersonates a tree.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=325061&view=rss&microfeed=true