<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, cnn]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, cnn]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/cnn http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/cnn <![CDATA[Salon and CNN Share an Awkward Redesign Moment]]> CNN and Salon both recently relaunched their web sites, and what do you know? We can't tell if CNN's going for the "more of a true web publication" thing or Salon's going for the "39 million unique visitors" look.

CNN's new look is here, and Salon's is here. Larger screengrabs below:

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5390121&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[CNN Doesn't Like Talking About Internal Twitter Shakeup]]> Rick Sanchez made news defending CNN's Iran coverage against a Twitter mob on the air Monday. But it turned out he had a less flattering story to tell behind the scenes.

The social-media obsessive defended his network's coverage in no uncertain terms when in front of the camears. "The story was reported every hour on CNN in some form or fashion," he said during a forceful on-air monologue (see attached clip).

But Sanchez was reportedly more revealing yesterday when speaking to fellow Twitter fans at a conference on the microblogging service, disclosing he'd written an email memo to superiors, prodding them to significantly expand their Iran coverage. Wrote one conference participant:

After his comments on the panel, Sanchez described to me and others how his email about #CNNFail on Twitter went up to the highest levels of the network. And, after the network's business, PR and marketing staff was pulled in, coverage the next day shifted...During the panel, Sanchez that "at no time did CNN drop the ball" - based upon his remarks following, however, I have to wonder whether there was an appreciation in the C-suite at CNN that the online backlash on Twitter was a hint that Amanpour reporting live from Tehran wasn't capturing the whole scene, and that US citizens were hungry for more information about what was happening on the streets and rooftaps of Iran.

The double-talk has already been noted on — where else — Twitter. Wrote NYU professor Jay Rosen, "Rick Sanchez told a different story to CNN viewers than he shared with participants" at the Twitter-fest. Sanchez's bragging about his clout at CNN would seem less duplicitous if only he'd posted it to Twitter himself; he'd hardly be the first journalist to use the service for naked self-promotion.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5294281&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Microsoft's Silly Holographic Meeting Tech Has Perfect Customer]]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.Microsoft's applied for a patent on facilitating meetings via hologram. Yes, this is ridiculous. But perhaps salable!

It's really a laughable patent. Most offices can't even reliably use the mature technology behind video conferences. So holograms, exponentially more complicated, should be yet another idea people won't be able to get working.

And, besides, the challenge is in the execution, not the conception. Patenting a holographic meeting is like patenting a flying car. Particularly when you skimp on the details:

The patent is rather vague on the actual hardware and software that would create these holographic meetings, although it does include 21 pictures and diagrams of how these meetings would take place.

Chalk this up as yet another indelible mark Bill Gates has left on his company. According to the Microsoft founder, we should all be enjoying computerized light fixtures and internet-connected ovens in our smart homes, where we carry around the tablet computers that have swept the market, and where we'll play with touch-sensitive tables made out of LCDs (if we can figure out how to set them up).

Luckily, Microsoft has a lucrative initial market ready to go this time around: cash-drenched cable-news networks, who are eager for ratings. Like CNN. As we all learned at election time, they love holograms.

The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5264849&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Twitter Is Down! Twitter Is Down! What Will CNN's Rick Sanchez Do?]]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.What does it take to move CNN newsman Rick Sanchez? Not, apparently, a plane crash which killed 50 people.

Twitter going down for scheduled maintenance during Sanchez's show, though? Everyone freak the fuck out! He's going to Facebook. He's going to MySpace. Somehow, we'll get through this disaster together.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5252775&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Did Ashton Kutcher Cheat His Way to a Million Twitter Pals?]]> Ashton Kutcher, we wish we could quit you. The model-actor-director-wantrepreneur has been racing CNN to attract a million followers on Twitter, and he barely won this morning. People are already suggesting the contest was rigged.

Guest of a Guest noticed that once you start "following" Kutcher's Twitter account — signing up to receive the 140-character messages he posts on the microblogging service — it's impossible to drop him. A test verified the failure. Click on the "Remove" button, and you get an error message:


Reloading the page, as Twitter suggests, does not solve the problem.

CNN's @cnnbrk account, meanwhile, allows followers to drop it without any issue:


It's hard to imagine this was anything but a bug. But it calls into question the legitimacy of Kutcher's victory. Which is surely the worst possible outcome for anyone who viewed the race with a wearied sigh: Now the limelight-addicted blowhard is going to race someone to 2 million followers.

(Photoillustration by Richard Blakeley)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5216642&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Twitterati Take a Snow Day]]> What's in Ruth Reichl's freezer? What disappoints Martha Stewart? Which New York wantrepreneur is about to get a snowball to the face? And why is a CNN reporter freaking out? Twitter has all the answers:

Martha Stewart looked down on New Yorkers intimidated by snow, a group which includes home-bound Gawker editor Gabriel "I'm taking a snow day" Snyder. And then she got into a crazy Twitter conversation with Perez Hilton about cupcakes. Which is pretty much what she deserved.

CNET's Twitter beat reporter, Caroline McCarthy, lived up to Stewart's haughty expectations.

New York editrix Jessica Coen watched television in the middle of the day.

CNN's Rick Sanchez had an all-caps freakout over AIG.

Gourmet editor-in-chief Ruth Reichl gave us a disturbing view of her larder and psyche.

Anyone else's tweets we should keep an eye on? Send us more Twitter usernames, please — or email us your favorite tweets.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5162817&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA["Obama bin Laden" Error Hits Yahoo's Homepage]]> It's not just angry rightwingers who mix up "Obama" and "Osama." Yahoo News has joined CNN and the Associated Press in confusing the most powerful man in the world with his terrorist enemy.

Here's the latest goof:

Science takes on terror hunt
A geographer uses innovative analysis to narrow Obama bin Laden's location to three sites.



That's some innovative analysis! Yahoo's news producers join a long line of Obama-Osama flubbers. In January 2007, a CNN on-air graphic for a story about the hunt for Osama Bin Laden, the Al Qaeda founder, asked, "Where's Obama"? The network apologized.

During the campaign, Republican candidate Mitt Romney repeatedly confused Barack Obama's last name with Osama Bin Laden's first one. They rhyme, after all. Last April, AP board chairman Dean Singleton made the same mistake, referring to the hunt for "Obama Bin Laden," prompting a jocular rebuke by Obama.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5155229&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Help me Anderson Cooper, you're our only hope]]> CNN's cheesy hologram stunt for election night got star power from hip-hop artist Will.i.am, whose 3D image was beamed into CNN's studios for an interview with anchor Anderson Cooper. Will.i.am. compared it to Star Wars; Cooper corrected him, saying it was more like Star Trek. But anyone who remembers Princess Leia's holographic plea for help in star Wars knows Will.i.am had his sci-fi references straight. Can you think of a better caption? Leave it in the comments. The best one will become the post's new headline. Yesterday's winner: theodp, for suggesting Google CEO Eric Schmidt was thinking, "With my $1 salary, I'll be getting a tax cut!"

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5077637&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[CNN vote coverage marred by hologram stunt]]> Throughout this election, self-interested vendors of neophilia have touted tech's ability to transform old-school politics. In reality, it has put a new facade on an old building: touchscreen vote analyses and Twitter quotations are just new ways of presenting exit polls and man-on-the-street interviews Barack Obama's heralded social-networking tools? Merely an update of the ward-boss operations of old. CNN's "virtual Capitol" on election night was the ludicrous culmination of this trend. When Wolf Blitzer thanked a holographic correspondent — "Jessica, you're a terrific hologram, thank you so much" — I realized that tech is not transforming the political process; it is debasing it.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5076717&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Websites race to take credit for Obama victory]]> Forget hacking voting machines; our media brethren are, at this moment, most concerned with gaming Digg to get out the vote for their stories about Barack Obama's apparent victory in the electoral college. (Our sister site Gawker was late to the game; its headline submission for "Obama Wins!" was seventh in line, judging by the URL.) Taking the lead: "Digg This If You Voted for Obama!" with more than 20,000 votes. It points to a CNN.com story. New media serves merely to confirm the victory of old media.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5076675&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[CNN analyst checks Facebook during debates]]> A cameraman caught CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin checking Facebook in the middle of Wednesday's presidential debate. Come on, admit it: You were doing it, too. (Why is GOP media consultant Alex Castellanos's name scrolling through the frame? Yeah, we couldn't figure that out, either, but we're told it's Toobin on screen, not Castellanos.)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5064271&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Ad targeting shoots CNN inside foreclosure article]]>

Matching advertisement to the contents of a website is financial nirvana, right? Wrong. Computers keep getting the ads wrong, with results that would be hilarious were they not so offensive. Yes, an article about foreclosures might be read eagerly by people who want to refinance their mortgage. But a mortgage ad next to a story about a woman who shot herself while being dragged out of her foreclosed home by sheriffs' deputies? Click the image to see the full screenshot.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5058830&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Wired lauds Current TV for copying CNN]]>
Current TV's Twitter-enhanced live feed of the Obama/McCain debate on Friday "broke new ground," according to Wired blogger Sarah Lai Stirland. But it's been nearly a month since the September 8 premiere of CNN's Rick Sanchez Direct, in which Sanchez turns the camera on Twitter for the modern version of man-on-the-street quotes. How it works: You add Rick. He adds you back. You then tweet live during his show. He may pullquote you, or run the live stream onscreen. Sanchez, currently following nearly 18,000 people, already drew attention for his live tweet-reading during Hurricane Gustav, when Twitterers filed reported facts to millions of viewers.

Current and Twitter's debate stream was interesting, but not new. Mashable and VentureBeat covered the launch of Sanchez's show three weeks ago, noting that CNN's arrival had forced Twitter's management to exempt Sanchez, like Robert Scoble, from their usual limit on the number of feeds one user could follow.

If you thought Current's lazy stream of debate tweets was hot, watch the above compilation of the always-slighty-overexuberant Sanchez: "My Twitterboard's about to explode." (Video by 23/6)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5056661&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How the MSM end-ran Obama]]> Barack Obama's campaign has been the most successful end-run of the mainstream media machine in American politics. But the senator's plan to text-message his announcement of a running mate at 3 a.m. Saturday —- deliberately out of step with the MSM news cycle — was beaten to the punch by a collusion of two factions: Experienced reporters out to get the scoop, and people close to the politicians who didn't get the gig.

Some news organizations managed to interrupt the séance between the campaign and its supporters by finding out that Senator Joseph Biden would be the nominee and jumping the announcement by a few hours, after midnight on the East Coast. As soon as Senator Obama began calling the non-nominees, names began leaking out, and the New York Times, MSNBC and others ran stories saying that all signs pointed to Mr. Biden. It was a small victory, but one that served as a reminder that the press will not abide any old script the campaign puts out.

John King of CNN was first to confirm the news. “You knew that there was treasure buried out there and it was just a matter of going and finding it,” Mr. King said in the press area at the Pepsi Center. “They want to make the rules one way, and we say, ‘No, if there is a piece of information, it is our job to go and get it.’”

(Photo by AP/Alex Brandon)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5041343&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[CNN's self-parodying headlines now available on T-shirts]]> Is CNN for real? The headlines on its website — "Minced onions force emergency landing" — cause some to wonder if its Atlanta-based producers aren't having a jape at the expense of news junkies. Now, an expansion into selling T-shirts confirms that CNN is laughing at us, not with us. Capitalizing on the trend of mass-personalized e-commerce, CNN.Shirt lets readers pick any recent headline and put it on a T-shirt. As blogger Andy Baio notes, the feature is easily manipulated, allowing users to construct any story they want and get it printed. But why bother making up the news when CNN shows just how much stranger truth is than fiction?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=382198&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The real reason Google is cooperating with China]]> pwned_license_plate.jpgCNN has been taken down in parts of China, and reports are suggesting that hackers who may have the support of the Chinese government are responsible. The attacks have come after many Chinese feel that the news network's reports seemed biased in favor of pro-Tibet sentiment. While a simple DDOS attack on CNN's servers is fairly unremarkable, boasts by Chinese hackers that "no Web site is one hundred percent safe" got me thinking. Maybe the reason that Google and other Valley companies are cooperating with the Chinese government isn't just because they're greedy, but also because they're scared. After all, helping to censor and track down dissidents doesn't generate bad press stateside the way that, say, a security breach exposing the private, personal data of millions of Americans might. (Photo by heinousjay)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381307&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Julia Allison earnestly explains the rise of the celebritard]]> CNN's Showbiz Tonight turned to Julia Allison to explain the phenomenon of tabloid regulars with little or no talent in this clip. She calls it the "de-evolution of celebrity." I can hear the producer on the phone now: "Hello, pot, we need someone to call the kettle black this afternoon. Are you available?" Of course, Allison doesn't just know how to put on makeup, wear a dress and pose like the rest of these creatures — she's an umtrepreneur!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=371734&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[CNN's blow-by-blow of Spitzer girl's MySpace and Facebook profiles]]> DupreFB1.pngMallory Simon works for "the most trusted name in news." But she's working hard to make CNN also the most trusted name in news feeds. Simon gives CNN.com readers every detail of when and how Eliot Spitzer's call girl, Ashley Alexandra Dupré, changed her MySpace and Facebook profiles last week. But at 1,000-plus words, Simon overstays her welcome. Instead of paying writers by the word, why don't we pay them to leave? The 100-word version, below.

  • Tuesday night — Dupré began deleting connections between friends on Facebook.
  • Wednesday morning — Timestamps and activity on her Facebook profile shows she was staying up all night cleaning up her profile and responding to critics.
  • Late Wednesday night — At 3 a.m., there was an entry that she had completed a "thorough profile scrub," leaving only a couple of photos of herself on Facebook and a clip of one of her songs on MySpace. Friends posted on her MySpace page telling her to ignore the media, they would be there for her and to stay strong.
  • Early Thursday morning — High school classmates created a group on Facebook. At 5 a.m., she confronted the classmates: "Do me a favor and don't try to cash out ... thanks," she wrote on Facebook.
  • Later Thursday morning — Dupré Facebook status: "Sneaking out the back door," she wrote. The page had received more than 1,100 friend requests on Facebook. Later, she accepts many of them.
  • By 2:30 p.m. the Facebook and MySpace profiles were gone.
  • They reappeared Friday.
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368798&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[CNN fires blogger for blogging]]> chez.jpgCNN fired American Morning producer Chez Pazienza yesterday for blogging on the side. The network says Pazienza was canned for not having his blog posts vetted by higher ups. He disagrees. "It's not that I've been writing," Pazienza told thePoMoblog. "It's WHAT I've been writing." On his blog, Pazienza writes that he "fell into TV news 16 years ago and been stuck there ever since (proving that the business really is a bottomless pit)." Thump!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=356066&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The fabulous life of the domain-name king]]> Domain_King.jpgRemember that guy you hate, Rick "Domain King" Schwartz? He sold iReport.com to CNN for $750,000 earlier this month. Well, the feeling's not mutual. He doesn't hate you. He just wonders why he's only one living the way he does. Schwartz told Sydney Morning Herald he's shocked more people don't get into the business of trading domain names. Because really, it's a fabulous life. Just ask the King himself.

I have a great lifestyle because the dollars come in the same whether I work or not. So I only work when I see opportunity. My most productive time is in the morning from about 5:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. with a break just for breakfast. Then off to a nice lunch. Then usually some type of leisure activity. Then a couple of hours to relax. Then dinner. Then watch some nightly TV and off to bed.
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=349797&view=rss&microfeed=true