<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, comments]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, comments]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/comments http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/comments <![CDATA[Tesla trying to raise $100 million?]]> Of troubled electric-car maker Tesla Motors, the shining light of Silicon Valley's nascent clean-transporation industry, commenter quistrl writes:
I hear the company is trying to raise 100mm with Goldman acting as the banker, anyone else hear anything.

First we've heard. Anyone else know if Goldman is out peddling a stake in the company? If true, it must take guts on the parts of Goldman's bankers; as trendy as cleantech is, money-losing startups are not in vogue.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5064160&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Halsey Minor's endless complaints]]> Multimillionaire CNET founder Halsey Minor is in the news again, for another spat over his expansive art collection. Portfolio explains that Minor got into an "angry email exchange" with famous artist Damien Hirst. There are now "gaping, fist-size holes in the plaster walls" of Minor's San Francisco offices, where Hirst's work used to hang. This comes as Sotheby's is suing Minor over a disputed art auction. After the article ran online, Minor left a rambling comment quibbling with details. But he never disputed the story's central question: Has Minor spent so impulsively and unwisely on art, real estate, new startups, and a new wife (Shannon, pictured with Minor, above), that he's running short on cash? He doesn't answer that. Instead, he declares himself "the baddest psycho in bass fishing." The comment seems as delusional as this moment he recounts in the story:

CBS chairman Sumner Redstone walked past him at the Bel-Air Hotel, shortly after CBS bought CNET for $1.8 billion. Minor hasn't been at CNET since 2000, and wasn't involved in the sale. So why would he expect Redstone to recognize him? Nostalgia? Pity? Portfolio reports on Minor's many difficult relationships; he told the magazine that Gateway founder Ted Waitt, formerly an investor in one of Waitt's startups, is no longer a friend. Add to the list of those difficult relationships: Minor with facts.

(Photo by Rob Howard/Portfolio)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5054641&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[That was fun while it lasted]]> Saner heads have prevailed, and we've bowed to the wisdom of the crowds who populate our comments: Valleywag will retain its new thread features, announced yesterday, but we'll display comment threads in chronological order, oldest to newest.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5053688&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Thread or menace? Valleywag comments are changing]]> THE GAWKER MEDIA OFFICE, NEW YORK — The rows of sleekly designed desks to my left are suspiciously quiet. The technical corps of our publisher, Gawker Media, is feverishly working on an update to our comments. And I'm here to witness it all! The big change: Related comments will be displayed together, as a "thread." And instead of being displayed oldest to newest, comments will be grouped by relative activity; the most tangled threads will get shuttled to the top. Update: We've decided to undo this change, displaying threads in chronological order, oldest to newest. The theory behind this: Threading is a way to make comments read more like conversations instead of a bunch of disconnected single replies. Participating in a thread is easy; instead of replying "@" another user, you can now join a thread by clicking the large circular "reply" arrow. And if you want to start a new thread? Just comment as usual. More details:

The first comment in a thread will have a few distinguishing features, among them, the number of replies in the thread along with the time of the most recent reply. Clicking the reply arrow on the lower right side opens a comment reply input box directly underneath the comment. No need to scroll all the way to the bottom of the page to reply.

How are the threads displayed? What happened to the chronological order?
Each "thread," or conversation, will be displayed in chronological order. But the conversations will be displayed by popularity. The most popular conversations will migrate to the top. The most recent comment that has no replies will appear on top for 15 minutes before being filtered down. If a more active conversation receives a reply within those 15 minutes, that conversation will overtake the standalone comment.

Where did the plus and minus go?
The plus and minus signs, which were used to friend or unfriend a fellow commenter, has been replaced by a heart. Friends show a red heart, and the rest are empty.

What's the deal with the star again?
Star commenters were readers who have 25 or more followers, or were designated as stars by a Valleywag editor. With the introduction of threading, the number of followers required to attain a star is increasing to 40.

Is there a way to view comments the "old-fashioned" way?
You can switch to the old comments layout by clicking the "classic view" link in the comments bar at the top of the threads.

How do I become Commenter of the Day?
Leave an outstanding comment.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5053166&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[BobDope]]> "come on. Like your readers haven't seen restraining orders before."

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028217&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Judge rules that Valleywag can't be held responsible for our commenters]]> Okay, it wasn't a case actually involving Valleywag, but ConsumerAffairs.com. Virgina judge Gerald Bruce Lee cited the Communications Decency Act in absolving the Web site and company of any liability for user complaints about car dealerships in Fairfax, Virginia. The commenters themselves, however, are still liable for defamation and libel lawsuits, so be nice! Or at least take steps to preserve your anonymity. Not a commenter on Valleywag, but would like to become one? Read our FAQ. We especially love folks who send us tips, preferrably from inside the belly of some Valley tech beast.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5020377&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Facebook can have him]]> Commenter Facebookcanhavehim shares this thought on Google überflack Elliot Schrage's prospective departure for Facebook:
It has nothing to do with Eric's philandering. It has everything to do with the fact that Elliot sucks and is being run out of the company. No idea he has held on so long considering how ineffective he has been. From the inside I can affirm his team hates him. The other executives see him as impotent, reckless, and self-promoting.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=387357&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Commenter of the week: broozier]]> Netscape and Ning founder Marc Andreessen's newfound pessimism drew this response from broozier:
Marc has also become, somehow, the anti-founder in the process. The 'nuclear winter' comment that's been circulating extensively among my group of friends was the final straw:

I'm not listening to you anymore, Marc Andreesen. You've become the "old man" of the technology business, and taking a crap on everyone's aspirations suggests you've lost both your ethical compass and your optimism. In short, it's not winning you any more fans.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=384294&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Valleywag emeritus offers unsolicited advice for Michael Arrington]]> Newly softhearted Gawker Media head Nick Denton offers some kindly advice for TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington: "@Michael Arrington: Hey, everybody has been expecting the grand roll-up ever since you hired Heather. I don't see it happening. Certainly don't see it sticking. And, without a roll-up, you have a niche Valley site with some 3% of the traffic of Gawker or Weblogs Inc. Good luck with that when the tech bubble bursts!"

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=379516&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Commenter of the week: Rachel Marsden]]> "Could someone please go up and punch Al [Gore] in the face? Then, when he calls the cops, ask him why he didn't try the UN first." — TV pundit Rachel Marsden, Valleywag's newest bestest friend fatale, splashes cold, conservative Canadian water in the faces of our NPR-numbed Bay Area readership [Valleywag Comments]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=378970&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[One commenter's prophesy for Microsoft: Uri Geller, John R. Coza and a secret task force]]> crazy_eyes.jpgMicrosoft CEO Steve Ballmer and chairman Bill Gates have it all wrong trying to take on Google by buying Yahoo. What they really need is "an underground secret team" that works in "a new office building in Cologne" and includes " John R. Coza." Also, they need to hire "as a sort of mascot / good luck guy" bigdowro, the commenter who had this prophesy and kindly shared it with the rest of us in 443 words. It's my favorite bizzaro dreamscape since Coleridge's Kubla Khan and its pasted below.

Here is my advice... I already wrote it under the Yahoo letter thread!!! MS should start an underground secret team and kick Google's ass..

Here is a true story... I once foresaw in a dream that Microsoft was planning to build a new office building in Cologne. As Valleywag wrote that article about Bill Gates on Facebook and I did not have Steve Ballmer's email, I wrote to the email on the Valleywag blog here...

I included some topics like symbolic formula entry for Excel and other ideas to wrap it up. I really thought I had psychic abilities... I am not kidding, once I bought a DVD called Mindbenders about Uri Geller and sang the songs in the movie all my way home, or predicted trivial stuff, like a menu at Xmas at my auntie and other crazy stuff...

To put it in a nutshell, I wrote an email to Mr. Gates that he should follow my idea and create a secret task force team with the best programmer's in the world... I cited names like John R. Coza the GA-guy and other names, but I had no clue whom else.

I said: Mr. Gates shover 'em with billions of dollars; go stealth, - and if you think, take over Yahoo! as a manoeuvre to put sand in your enemies eyes, - but fot God's sake , pls hire me; and let me be on board or at least follow my plan through...

Well I gues I had overdone this, but I thought it was a symbolic dream I had...

Guess what? I got a reply from some OEM Manager I had known before; who told me about the Unsollicted Idea Submission Policy, and said I had good ideas and should study on, then I might join Microsoft one day...

I was completely desillusioned by Microsoft. Okay I might habe overdone the "I am on a mission" / "I have prophetic abilities" thing, but I swear to God it is 100 percent true. I even offered to volunteer a lie detection test... Yet I got an answer from Mr. Gates' assistant or whoever.

I don't know... I have a bad feeling that Microsoft ist going to acquire Yahoo! My idea about the above top secret task force would have been funnier and would have a surprise momentum at least. And hiring me officially at the cafeteria of an MS Office and inofficial having me on a top secret task force team, be it as the guy to organize food, concierge services, and what else the top programmer's would have needed, and as a sort of mascot / good luck guy, wouldn't have ruinied Microsoft either.

(Photo by headcase)]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=377210&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Microsoft-Yahoo summit at Sunnyvale fizzles]]> Microsoft and Yahoo execs met this week in Sunnyvale, but the talks didn't go anywhere. The sticking point: Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer's troops refused to consider raising their cash-and-stock bid and so Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang's representatives likewise refused to initiate "formal negotiations," the WSJ reports. Meanwhile, commenters confirm that while its new brand advertising platform flounders, Yahoo "is indeed a mess inside. Yahoo is full of pissing matches at the VP level." Please, tell us more.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376034&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Yahoo finally wins one, beats Google's DoubleClick severance package]]> Yang_hurrah.jpgCommenter and steadfast Yahoo apologist MarktheMarketWatcher zings Google's skimpy severance package for laid-off DoubleClickers:
Yahoo! has promised, at a minimum, a 4 month severance package to anyone who might be terminated in the event of a Microsoft takeover. So whose not evil, anyway?
Yes, congratulations, Yahoo. Your search revenues — no, your growth rate — no, your severance package outshines Google's. Of course, as my colleague Jordan Golson notes, "I bet if Google could give severance packages with Microsoft's money they'd be a lot more generous too." For inadvertent hilarity, MarktheMarketWatcher wins commenter of the day.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=375319&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Commenter of the day: innonate]]> "You're a dick, Owen. And you run fake stories every day anyway." — Double-crossed April Fools entrepreneur Nate Westheimer demonstrates his Valley CEO potential. And let this be a reminder: People say Valleywag will stab you in the back. That's a lie. Valleywag will stab you in the face.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=374679&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Commenter of the week: random_play]]> This made me LOL for real: In this post about the memo CNET CEO Neil Ashe sent out regarding CNETs recent layoffs, commenter random_play penned a beauty:

The memo is as transparent as it is salient. Simply, Neil Ashe states that CNET needs to embrace change by exploiting their first-mover advantage to drive efficiencies by conceptualizing and architecting brand-centric, seamless, end-to-end, best-of-breed solutions for forward-leaning virtual communities.
But wait, we're just getting started:
The new is old. Agile is the new New. We are at the tipping point. This will change everything. It's about dynamic aggregation, not static accumulation. High impact/low adhesion. Vertically integrated solutions for a flat world. Long tail, meet fat snout. You need someone who gets it: Splog is an aggregate noun. Roll your own roll-your-own. Social is the new push. Tag the globe, then globalize the tags. Microformats for metablogging. Enable rich-client widgets for on-demand streams. Above all, incentivize semantic synergies and you'll never have to worry about monetizing sticky eyeballs — they'll be glued to your viral paradigm!
The worst part? I could actually see some of The 250 earnestly saying some of that. Especially the dynamic aggregation bit.]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=374173&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Maybe a CNET pink slip will raise that infant]]> "That's life," commenter danmiller3 wrote after we told you about how CNET laid off an employee recovering from cancer. Turns out he was more right than he knew. A new CNET tipster tells that one of his laid-off colleagues lost his job just two months after his wife gave birth. "Fuck Neil Ashe," our source says. He says CNET employees are "all half hoping" private equity firm Jana Partners — which already has a 14.9 percent stake in the company — "takes over and fixes the platform and other underlying legacy issues from when CNET was a cable syndicator instead of trying to create tons of new fledgling brands."

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373662&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Why don't you just read Valleywag? That seems easier]]> Commenter Matthew O'Ryan is on to us. He's noticed how a throwaway line has become our new catchphrase: "That seems easier." In an industry full of people who claim to be obsessed with efficiency, why do we have to keep explaining over and over the simple way to do things? Because Valley denizens secretly love doing things the hard way — and they hate it when people point out we're doing it wrong. Neophilia, cast as a love of innovation, is actually an algorithm for generating ever-changing shibboleths that keep outsiders away. They make things complicated because it entertains them; because they love challenges and puzzles; because they can. But the world that pays their bills? Customers like things simple. Why not keep them happy? Ah, but you know how that would seem.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373237&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Porn millionaire Andrew Conru reportedly engaged to church lady (Update: He's not)]]> Whatever happened to Andrew Conru, the porn baron of Palo Alto? After selling Various Inc., the parent company of X-rated singles site Adult FriendFinder, to Penthouse for $500 million in December, he's getting his personal life in order, commenter rumourone informs us. He's reportedly still working at Various, but planning his departure. (Will Penthouse disclose this fact when it files to go public, largely on the strength of Conru's Web businesses?) Also, he's engaged to a "devout Lutheran" named Lois. Ironic, given his porn profiteering? Hardly. Conru also launched — and sold along with FriendFinder — a religious social network, BigChurch.com, where he supposedly met Lois. Update: Conru has written in to deny the Lois story. The full Conru tale from rumourone follows:

Andrew is doing well. He feels a little tramatized by the adult industry-imagine the hours he has worked and imagine the effect those images have had on his mental state.

He is spending time evaluating his new life, its new phase, and enjoying the simple things he once enjoyed. He is rediscovering a normal life. All the while, he is still working Various, and planning his permanant departure.

Andrew is very interested in aquaculture, he has purchased a small boat, and is somewhere in the Pacific ocean at this very moment, accompanied by his fiance-a devout Lutheran. Lois is a woman of high moral reproach that he met at bigchurch.com. She is not very attractive, but he likes her for her innerds.

They are building a treehouse in the forest. He is chopping wood for the winter, and she is canning jams and beans. Although they are starting late in life, they are planning a family of 16-some of the children are from her 4 previous marriages.

Andrew reports that he has found his "quintessential great find", and is very happy.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=371498&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Wired writer flacks for Google]]> Wired.com editor Leander Kahney writes up received Google fictions peddled by the search engine's PR division as fact in this month's Wired magazine. Google's employee perks are a common topic in the press, but our readers tell us the reality is far from the earthly paradise Google sells to gullible journalists. Leander makes working at Google seem like heaven:

And today, if Google hasn't made itself a Greenleaf-esque slave to its employees, it's at least a cruise director:

Kahney goes on:

The Mountain View campus is famous for its perks, including in-house masseuses, roller-hockey games, and a cafeteria where employees gobble gourmet vittles for free. What's more, Google's engineers have unprecedented autonomy; they choose which projects they work on and whom they work with. And they are encouraged to allot 20 percent of their work week to pursuing their own software ideas. The result? Products like Gmail and Google News, which began as personal endeavors.
The reality is that only engineers get 20 percent time, and many are pressured by managers not to use it. The result? Gmail and Google News came out years ago, and 20 percent time hasn't resulted in anything meaningful enough to flog to the press since. (Photo by AP/Paul Sakuma)]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=370190&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Mashable introduces video commenting, terrifying new reality]]> Embedding videos into Valleywag comments is as easy as dragging and dropping a YouTube URL into the comments field. One advantage this method holds over Mashable's video comments: Embedding a YouTube video of yourself takes at least one extra step. Trust us: No one wants to hear you talk. Especially me. I get paid by the pageview.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=369965&view=rss&microfeed=true