<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, ed zander]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, ed zander]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/edzander http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/edzander <![CDATA[Will Carl Icahn crash Yahoo?]]> In explaining Carl Icahn's raid on Yahoo, pundits bring up his efforts to shake up tech and media giants like Motorola and Time Warner. But I think there's a better analogy in Icahn's past: TWA. Icahn's attempt to gain a board seat or broker a new deal to sell Yahoo to Microsoft will not send Yahoo soaring; if left unchecked, he will run Yahoo into the ground as surely as he did that troubled airline. Icahn's bid, and the support it is drawing from large Yahoo investors, seems premised on the notion that he can bring Microsoft and Yahoo back to the bargaining table. That seems unlikely.

As with TWA, Icahn is making a fundamental mistake. He thought that an airline was about airplanes, and he likewise must imagine Yahoo is about websites, or banner ads, or searches. Wrong in both cases. Those businesses aree about people. At TWA, his actions precipitated crippling labor unrest. At Yahoo, the talent won't strike, but it will leave — those who haven't already walked out the door, that is. At Microsoft, too, the thought of taking on all of Yahoo's problems is sparking unease among the executives who would be charged with making a deal work.

Besides Microsoft, it's unclear what Icahn can do for Yahoo, or to Yahoo. Certainly, its board and management need wholesale replacement. Yahoo requires a "product Nazi," one Silicon Valley executive told me, to bust through the company's broken culture of consensus and impose a singular vision on all its efforts. But Icahn is exactly the wrong person to attract that kind of talent. He freely admits he knows nothing about technology; he's just good at opportunism.

As Dan Lyons, writing as Fake Steve Jobs, points out, Icahn's assault will likely start with a character assassination on Jerry Yang, as Icahn did with Motorola CEO Ed Zander, who soon resigned. With Yang's poor performance handling the Microsoft bid, he has sharpened Icahn's knives for him.

Yahoo president Sue Decker should start earning her outsized pay and head this off by taking the lead on handling Icahn. (Yang, the prickly cofounder) is far too tone-deaf to handle such a negotiation.) She should take her cues from former Time Warner CEO Richard Parsons, who played Icahn like a fiddle during his attempted raid on that company; instead of breaking the company up, as Icahn suggested, Parsons arranged for a slightly larger buyback of shares than previously planned.

The lesson from Parsons: The way to handle Icahn is to spend lots of time letting him talk, and then figure out how to pitch something the company was planning to do anyway as his brilliant idea. For Decker, who is widely thought unqualified to be CEO at Yahoo or anywhere else, it will be excellent practice for her future as a perpetual No. 2.

(Photoillustration by Jackson West; photo of Icahn by AP/Mark Lennihan)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=390509&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Former Motorola insider slams company's incompetence, reapplies for employment]]> moto.jpgIn what amounts to a public job application to Motorola CEO Greg Brown, Numair Faraz, former assistant to Razr creator Geoffrey Frost, slams the company and former CEO Ed Zander for astounding ineptitude. Catch the full story over at Gizmodo or see our 100-word version below.
After making repeated attempts to contact you via your office, I am forced to write this open letter to publicly air my grievances concerning Motorola.
Faraz continues:

As I told the company's senior designers at Motorola's 75th anniversary meeting: create something cooler and more expensive than anything else out there, and everyone will want it.

Zander ... seemed to care more about his golf score than running one of America's greatest corporations.

Many believe Ed Zander worked Geoffrey to death, putting the pressure of the fate of the company in his hands ... Ed Zander continued to reap the dividends of Geoffrey's work, and the company made billions in profit from overselling the RAZR. He had the audacity to say "well, maybe Geoffrey should have come up with a better successor to the RAZR," and told me to "wait for big things in 2008." I guess he was right — he got a big golden parachute, and exited out of the company.

Maybe it sounds like I take the downfall of Motorola personally; I do. It was my experience at Motorola, with people like Geoffrey and all of the loyal employees who still remain, that taught me that Corporate America can and should be; now, with people such as Zander and yourself, Motorola symbolizes the worst of Corporate America.

I've been there when Motorola's handset division was brought back from the brink of death 5 years ago; follow my advice, and we can do it again.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373128&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Why it's splitsville for Motorola]]> The cellular graveyardMotorola, mortally wounded, is spinning off its handset business in slow motion. CEO Greg Brown expects the deal to go through next year. There's no Razr on the horizon to spur sales, thanks to former CEO Ed Zander's overreliance on the model. In San Francisco cofeeshops, the popular theory is that Apple's iPhone killed Motorola. Nonsense. Motorola killed Motorola. The population of the Bay Area is 7.2 million; despite the appearance that every man, woman, and child here now has an iPhone, Apple will be lucky to have sold that many by now.

Motorola sells 20 times that many phones in a year. No, the real problem is that Samsung has taken market share from it in the U.S., where Motorola dominates, and Nokia is killing it in the developing world. And that's entirely Motorola's fault. Fixated by the high-end smartphones popular in the U.S., Motorola didn't sell enough cheap phones elsewhere. While we debate the relative virtues of locked and unlocked iPhones, billions of people wait to make their first telephone call ever. You can only sell so many phones to The 250 — even if they keep breaking them.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372473&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Motorola CEO Zander resigns]]> AP070108014005.jpgEd Zander is stepping down as CEO of cell-phone maker Motorola on January 1. He will be replaced by current president and COO Greg Brown. Zander plans to "go do the things that my wife and I have wanted to do now for years and years." One analyst calls the move a "slight positive" for the company. In its most recent quarter, Motorola had a 94 percent drop in profit — maybe it is time for some fresh blood, but promoting Zander's No. 2 hardly seems like the trick. (Photo by AP/Damian Dovarganes)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=328554&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Motorola CEO finds software confusing, dull]]> Ed ZanderMotorola CEO Ed Zander claimed that his company considered buying Navteq, the mapping-services company rival Nokia snapped up last week, but decided to pass. "We are not in the applications business," said Zander. Right. That explains, of course, why Motorola bought Good Technology, an email software company, last year. We have another theory: Bitches just jealous.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=309183&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Ed Zander spins his wheels]]>
Pity Ed Zander, who's learning that timing is everything. The Motorola CEO today had to confess to Wall Street that his company's cell-phone sales were off again and the business was looking likely to run a loss for the year. He arrived at Motorola from Silicon Valley in January 2004, hailed as a tech visionary. As sales of the Razr took off, Fortune asked if he was "the greatest CEO in America — or simply the luckiest." Neither, it turns out. Here's where Zander went wrong.


Motorola's business, like Gaul, is divided into three parts: cell phones, networking equipment, and cable set-top boxes. In theory, that positions Motorola well for the future, since the cable companies which today buy Motorola set-tops need to upgrade their broadband networks and will one day want to sell their customers service packages that include cell-phone plans. But in practice, those are highly competitive markets with different customers, business models, and competitors. Any one of those businesses would be hard to run; together, they're a management nightmare. Zander's pedaling as fast as he can, but he still can't keep up.

But apparently, he'd rather keep his technological Roman Empire intact than let any of the provinces break off, even though private-equity buyers would be happy to take some off his hands. BusinessWeek suggests that Motorola's board may soon kick him upstairs. Zander will either have to accept a lesser role at Motorola — or a lesser company to run. Sic semper tyrannis.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=280304&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Eric Jackson strikes again!]]> Rumors that Ed Zander may step down as CEO of Motorola caused the stock to rise nearly 2% today. Whether or not the rumor is true, it demonstrates investors are no longer confident in Ed Zander's leadership of the chip and cell phone manufacturer. It also shows the growing power of the grassroots shareholder campaigns of Eric Jackson, who recently took on Terry Semel at Yahoo.

One week after Eric Jackson stood up during Yahoo's shareholder meeting to ask the CEO to apologize to shareholders, Terry Semel stepped down. Now, less than a week after releasing his "Motorola Plan B", rumors of Ed Zander's departure surface. Both companies were languishing relative to their competition; both CEO's were criticized from all directions. But rarely do shareholder proposals succeed, and both CEOs have withstood more powerful opposition (Carl Icahn was unsuccessful in his bid to unseat Zander earlier this year). It will be difficult for the shareholder activist to resist taking credit for taking down two CEOs within a week in less than a month... even if the reasons are larger than one man. Underperforming CEOs beware, Eric Jackson has a list. You might be next. [Photo: Reuters]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=277394&view=rss&microfeed=true