<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gawker: Valleywag, Intuit]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/intuit</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker posts tagged 'valleywag, intuit']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intuit gives 575 employees permanent, unpaid vacations]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kazanjy/404869589/"><img src="http://valleywag.com/assets/images/valleywag/2008/06/intuit_thanks_you_for_conserving_payroll.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>In a press release yesterday, financial software company Intuit announced a realignment, and by realignment, they mean <a href="http://www.intuit.com/about_intuit/press_room/press_release/2008/0626.jsp">laying off seven percent of the company's workforce</a> — mostly in finance, according to a tipster. The press release went out well before individual employees were notified of their status, which can't have helped morale with everyone thinking they might get a pink slip. The company also revised earnings expectations downward. How did Wall Street react? After a brief boost Wednesday morning, the company's share price was right back to the level before the layoff announcement. Yahoo may be using the word reorganization instead of realignment, <a href="http://valleywag.com/5020084/at-long-last-yahoo-reorg-to-put-employees-out-of-their-misery">but in the end it will mean the same thing</a>.<em>(Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kazanjy/404869589/">Peter Kazanjy</a>)</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.gawker.com/5020338/intuit-gives-575-employees-permanent-unpaid-vacations]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5020338]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intuit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reorgs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson West]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5020338&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intuit gets a logo update, sticks with $328 million in auction-rate securities it can't sell]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/34/2008/04/thumb160x_intuitnewlogo.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />An Intuit tipster tells us that management gathered up the peons for a "a rah rah speech about making us the most admired company that everyone wants to work for," yesterday. Then they unveiled the new logo, pictured. "Needless to say no one in the Valley seemed to pay attention." Sure, we're watching Intuit! Just the other day <a href="http://valleywag.com/373341/monster-palm-and-three-other-tech-companies-own-856-million-in-paper-no-one-wants-to-buy">we reported</a> that instead of keeping cash or investing in a more liquid instrument, Intuit owns about $328 million in auction-rate securities &mdash; you know, the kind no one's willing to buy.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.gawker.com/375625/intuit-gets-a-logo-update-sticks-with-328-million-in-auction+rate-securities-it-cant-sell]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-375625]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[high finance]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cubicle culture]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intuit]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Carlson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=375625&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Monster, Palm and three other tech companies own $856 million in paper no one wants to buy]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://valleywag.com/assets/resources/2008/03/AuctionRateBarGraph.jpg"><img src="http://valleywag.com/assets/resources/2008/03/AuctionRateBarGraph-thumb.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></a>Instead of holding onto cash, tech firms such as Monster, Palm, Intuit, EarthLink and MetroPCS in recent years bought something called auction-rate securities. Basically &mdash; very basically &mdash; that means these companies loaned out around $856 million because banks told them they'd earn more than they would just holding on to the cash. Only thing is now, with the credit markets being what they are &mdash; crappy &mdash; no one else wants to buy the rights to collect on those loans. So all that cash is sewn up in paper. That could soon hurt because the companies are going to need that cash eventually, an exec at one Wall Street trading firm <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120666247023070263.html?mod=yahoo_hs&ru=yahoo">told the WSJ</a>. And when they do, he said, they should expect "a steep loss."</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.gawker.com/373341/monster-palm-and-three-other-tech-companies-own-856-million-in-paper-no-one-wants-to-buy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-373341]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[high finance]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[earthlink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intuit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[metropcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[monster.com]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Carlson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=373341&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Will Intuit's new CEO prove a Google guy?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Brad Smith" src="http://valleywag.com/assets/resources/2007/08/bradsmith.jpg" width="98" height="136" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" />It's odd, sometimes, the contortions reporters will go through to make a story out of nothing &mdash; especially when they miss the real one. Take, for example, this <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,136318-c,companynews/article.html">report from IDG News</a> about the planned departure of Intuit CEO Steve Bennett. The subhead of the article: "Intuit chief executive's resignation is not tied to April tax database snafu." The first sentence: "Four months after a database problem prevented thousands of U.S. users from paying their taxes on time, Intuit Inc.'s chief executive announced plans to step down." Obsessed with an embarrassing, expensive, but ultimately meaningless, glitch in Intuit's tax-prep software, IDG misses what's interesting about Bennett <a href="http://www.intuit.com/about_intuit/press_room/press_release/2007/0822cr.jhtml">stepping down in December</a> to make way for Intuit SVP <a href="http://web.intuit.com/about_intuit/executives/brad_smith.html">Brad Smith</a>.</p><p></p>

<p>Intuit has long had unusually close links with Google. The company's chairman, <a href="http://web.intuit.com/about_intuit/executives/bill_campbell.html">Bill Campbell</a>, though not credited for it, has long been an important advisor to Google CEO Eric Schmidt and company founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin. And the two companies share a campus in Mountain View.</p>

<p>Smith, currently in charge of the company's QuickBooks accounting software and related small-business products, will become CEO in January 1. And if anything, you can expect relations between Intuit and Google to become tighter. Smith, after all, helped negotiate a deal between the companies to integrate QuickBooks and AdWords, Google's text ads that have proved popular with small businesses.</p>

<p>If anything, in fact, Smith would be the logical architect of a merger between Google and Intuit. They share a common enemy in Microsoft. Google has demonstrated skills in Web-based software, while Intuit has an extremely loyal small-business customer base.</p>

<p>And best of all, buying Intuit would give Google much-needed real estate adjacent to its current headquarters. Even with plans to slow down out-of-control hiring, Google could use more room close to home. And that's one thing only Intuit can offer.</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.gawker.com/292906/will-intuits-new-ceo-prove-a-google-guy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-292906]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hires]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill campbell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brad smith]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eric schmidt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intuit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve bennett]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:57:24 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Owen Thomas]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=292906&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intuit announces plans for an online version...]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Intuit announces plans for an online version of Quicken, its popular personal-finance tracker. Which decade is this again? [<a href="http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9759443-7.html">News.com</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.gawker.com/289277/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-289277]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intuit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[quicken]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:16:49 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Owen Thomas]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=289277&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
