<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, jim cramer]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, jim cramer]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/jimcramer http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/jimcramer <![CDATA[Disgraced stockpickers picking stocks]]> If the government hasn't investigated you, why should anyone listen to your stock tips? That's the lesson of three Wall Street chatterboxes who once faced SEC scrutiny — and are now bigger in the stock-talk business than ever.

The latest stock jock to retake the field is Thom Calandra, the founding editor of MarketWatch, a financial-news site now owned by News Corp. He has launched a new investment newsletter, Ticker Trax, on Stockhouse.com. A gutsy move, considering that's exactly the vehicle which crashed his career at MarketWatch; an SEC investigation found that Calandra was buying shares of stocks he recommended before he wrote them up in a MarketWatch newsletter, and then selling them after publication. He surrendered $416,109.58 in illegal profits, and paid a $125,000 fine. As part of the settlement,

Calandra joins Henry Blodget, who was banned from the securities industry for privately trash-talking stocks, but now runs Silicon Alley Insider, a tech-stocks blog. He's been profiled in Wired and explaining Wall Street's woes in The Atlantic. CNBC shouter Jim Cramer draws higher ratings than ever for his populist on-air rants. As a money manager, he was investigated by the SEC and cleared, but later admitted to manipulating stocks. Nevertheless, he's now nominating himself as the SEC's next chairman.

So why are we taking advice from admitted crooks? I think we all cynically subscribe to the theory that it takes a thief to catch one. The mortgage meltdown revealed abuses at Wall Street firms that encompassed the entire business; it wasn't a matter of bad apples, but a rotten barrel. If the game is rigged, then who better to guide your play than the most expert of riggers?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5101566&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Jim Cramer chairman at TheStreet.com]]> Back when Jim Cramer was an active hedge-fund trader, rather than an on-air fit-thrower for CNBC, he kept his distance from TheStreet.com, lest the site be accused of advancing his portfolio. No such distance now: He's replacing Thomas Clarke as chairman. Clarke remains CEO. [Silicon Alley Insider]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5070700&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Eric Schmidt on Jim Cramer's Mad Money, the 60-second version]]> Eric Schmidt spent 18 minutes on CNBC yesterday talking to Mad Money's Jim Cramer, but per usual, the Google CEO didn't say much. Only about 60 seconds worth, we discovered after boiling the segment down to its crucial bits. Learn that Google is bad economy-proof, YouTube doesn't make money (and doesn't need to), and that shareholders should just stay quiet in the clip above.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5036980&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[New service turns Twitter into another penny-stock tout]]> Oversharing meets Wall Street! On Covestor, you share your brokerage-account activity with other people. Just added: an integration with Twitter. Just as hundreds of thousands of CNBC viewers hang on the every word of nutty Jim Cramer, now literally tens of people will sheepishly follow your trades. Pushing penny stocks, 140 characters at a time, has never been so easy. [Mashable]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5036221&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Cramer: "Apple is too dangerous until we hear about Jobs"]]> After giving a lower forecast for its September quarter than Wall Street expected, Apple saw its shares drop 3 percent today. TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says not to blame the numbers, but the numbskull PR move Apple made in refusing to discuss plans for Jobs's successor. "Look," Cramer says in the clip embedded below, "I thought the forecast was great. This is all about [Apple saying] Jobs's health is a 'personal matter."

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5027879&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Cramer: "Cleveland Valley," not Silicon Valley, will save us]]> At a breakfast event to conclude New York's Internet Week this morning, TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer said Valley innovation is all about creating "fancy ways to deliver music and videogames." The obstreperrific stockpicker said videogame makers Take-Two and Activision are tech's two most successful companies, other than Apple and Google — and that's fine, but it's also a sign Silicon Valley won't save us from the economic woes the markets gave a hint of last week. Instead, he predicts the Rust Belt — "Cleveland Valley," Cramer calls it — will. (Cramer joins Miss South Carolina in illustrating the need for better geography education in our schools.) The region, better known as the Cuyahoga River Valley, has had to reposition itself as the home of what Cramer calls "New Tech," building such marvels as "windmills with blades the size of 747 wings." Other highlights from Cramer's characteristically energy-charged talk and photos, below.

Cramer on the economy:

There are two kinds of companies right now. Those that need oil and capital and those that don't. I'm bullish on those that don't and those that produce raw materials.

On media:

My kids don't know what Newsweek is. Newsweek should be Kaplan [the educational-testing business, owned, like Newsweek, by the Washington Post Company)].

Rupert Murdoch is going to be Sam Zell and see what the Wall Street Journal can do on the Internet. With maybe half the journalists.

(Cramer's referring to Zell's ill-time purchase of newspaper publisher Tribune.)

On politics:

There's a movie coming out this summer, Get Smart. In the old show, Control battled against the evil Chaos. Lately, it's felt like Chaos has been running things.

On Microsoft-Yahoo:

Microsoft has to buy Yahoo because Google is going to give away the OS for search queries. Icahn will force the deal. Yang and his allies only own about 9 percent of the company. The Bancroft family owned 60 percent of the Journal and that didn't stop progress.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5014622&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[TheStreet.com's having trouble negotiating with Jim Cramer?]]>
Jim Cramer, the Wall Street blowhard, is having trouble coming to terms on a contract with TheStreet.com, the financial site he cofounded. The last one expired at the end of 2007. For now, Cramer has signed his second two-month extension in a row. After April 15, it's up again. If Cramer's outburst during the last market meltdown is any indication, I'm sure talks are proceeding calmly and reasonably.

As Silicon Alley Insider points out, both parties have much to lose. Cramer still owns 14 percent of the company, a stake worth around $42 million. CNBC, where Cramer yells a lot on air, has less of a Web audience than TheStreet.com. And try this pop quiz: Name someone who writes for TheStreet.com besides Cramer.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=359830&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[One thing Microsoft could do is "fire everyone"]]> Why are Yahoo executives looking for an alternative to Microsoft? Ask Jim Cramer: "The outside of Yahoo is very good. The inside? They haven't been able to figure out how to monetize these pageviews. So basically, [Microsoft] can take their pageviews [and] fire everyone. Maybe there's some sales people you keep."

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=352730&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[CNBC's resident lunatic, Jim Cramer, makes predictions for '08]]> CNBC's Jim Cramer, host of Mad Money, dropped his predictions for 2008 in New York magazine this week. Along with some safe bets like "oil goes up" and "Goldman Sachs makes a lot of money," Cramer throws out some unlikely but not off-the-wall predictions about Verizon and Apple. But then when he gets to Google, he goes off the deep end.

Google continues its dominance and becomes one of the top three companies in the U.S. in market capitalization. It doubles its advertising share, at the expense of television and print. It also successfully challenges Microsoft for operating-system dominance. Microsoft calls for a government investigation of Google's power, but no one cares because Microsoft is just too hated for anyone in Washington to champion. The stock roars to $1,000.
Market cap? Sure. But Google doubling its ad share? Not likely. However you want to measure "ad share," Google would have to double its revenue, at least. Last year, the company made $10 billion in revenue, a 72 percent increase over the year before. Now, with higher sales, you expect them to jump that high again? Mathematically unlikely. Check out Google's quarterly results: Theyr'e adding $200 million to $500 million in revenue a quarter, which is spectactular on its own, but not a recipe for doubling market share in a year.

And devoting so much space to Microsoft and operating systems just shows that Cramer doesn't really understand Google at all. Sure, Microsoft made a half-hearted effort to complain about the DoubleClick deal, but didn't have much to stand on. Google is far from an advertising monopoly. And what does any of this have to do with operating systems?

Cramer missed the one area where Google is actually competing with Microsoft: In Google Apps, which is trying to take down Microsoft Office, and mostly failing. Jim, you should have stopped at "GOOG goes up." It's not much of a prediction, but at least it makes sense.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=340735&view=rss&microfeed=true