<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, jordan golson]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, jordan golson]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/jordangolson http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/jordangolson <![CDATA[When bloggers blog bloggers, is the result blather — or better?]]> Did you know Netscape cofounder Marc Andreessen has joined eBay's board? Why yes, it's true — and it happened last month. VentureBeat editor Eric Eldon had gotten a belated tip about the hire, and published the story without checking the date. "I made a stupid mistake," he tells me. (He was more oblique in Twitter.) Eldon rapidly took the story down, but not before it was syndicated to The Industry Standard, where it caught the eye of Nicholas Carlson, my former charge at Valleywag who has landed at Silicon Alley Insider.

See the hypercompetitive pattern? Hacks have always hustled to scoop rival papers. But tech blogs are being driven to distraction by the notion that they've been beaten by a story. In the rush to publish, they're not even stopping to check their own archives.

Checking actual facts is far more cumbersome. Jordan Golson, another former Valleywagger who now blogs at the Industry Standard, made a stink about a report on TheHill.com about iPhones coming to Congress. TheHill.com's overly sensational headline topped a report that merely stated that Congress's administrative arm was testing some iPhones. Golson called the flack quoted in TheHill.com's story, who backpedaled from his earlier statement that "lots" of Congressmen had requested iPhones.

Tom Krazit of CNET News, one of the guilty parties cited by Golson for reblogging TheHill.com, got to the bottom of things: Congressional IT administrators were testing a total of 10 iPhones, and all of two Congressmen had asked about getting iPhones instead of the standard-issue BlackBerry.

This messy process shows the blogosphere at its best and its worst. Through a series of iterations, the horde of bloggers arrived at the right result. In the meantime, however, a lot of people got the wrongheaded notion that Congress is switching to the iPhone any day now. (I'd note that TheHill.com has yet to retract its initial report; it would not be the first time a flack has said something, regretted it, and then claimed he was misquoted.)

There will always be a factchecking squad on the Internet. But I think the reblogging craze will fade over time, as the Web's writers learn the deep satisfaction of telling one's own story for the first time — not repeating someone else's for the nth.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5070039&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Valleywag alumni watch]]> Jordan Golson has landed at The Industry Standard, quippy as ever. On Nancy Pelosi's call for the Valley to throw cash at solving the world's problems: "I'm not sure why Pelosi is asking for help with education and building infrastructure when we can't even get Twitter running reliably — and that's the real crisis, isn't it?" [Industry Standard]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5012702&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[TechCrunch editor flubs story but "can't go back on it now"]]> I'm on IM with Jordan Golson, and he's on the phone with TechCrunch editor Mike Arrington. You see, Valleywag sort of, um, fired Jordan this morning, and Mike got a bogus version of the story claiming it was all because of one post Jordan did criticizing his management. Jordan wants Mike to correct the article, saying that's not what happened at all — he was dismissed over much bigger issues. To my profound disappointment, Arrington just replied to him, "I can't go back on it now that I've written it." Sure enough, Arrington's updates to the post claim Jordan's explanations are "confusing" and full of "contradictions," rather than just admitting TechCrunch got told the story wrong, which seems easier. Now you know why Mike always insists that you not call him a journalist.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=380585&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Valleywag writer's pay complaint — the 100-word version]]> Jordan GolsonJordan Golson, Valleywag's resident hypercapitalist, is distressed that he's not going to learn the terms of his pageview-based bonus — which, mind you, he'll likely earn on top of his $2,500-a-month base pay — until three days into the second quarter. The ginger whinger made me proud with a headline so sensational that it offended even my boss. But he disappointed me by wasting readers' time, taking a self-indulgent 542 words to get his point across. After the jump, a readable version of Golson's overwrought, underreported screed:

The rate that my employer, Gawker Media, pays its contract writers was adjusted tonight at midnight. A "modest reduction." We'll find out the new pay plan by the end of the week. Writers are expected to continue working. No matter how much traffic their posts generate, writers will receive at least their base. On top of that, productive writers can receive a "Pageview Bonus," which varies depending on which site they write for. If I were a salesperson, I'd expect to know my quarterly sales goals well in advance.
Golson maintained this wasn't an April Fools' post, but I'm sure that last line gave any reader who worked in sales a good laugh.]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=374791&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[$44.6 billion is too much — I bought a Yahoo for $10.99!]]> yahoo1099thumb.jpgAt lunch today, I bought my very own Yahoo. It wasn't as pretty as Flickr, but it was del.icio.us. Cobblestones in Lowell, Mass., sells a Yahoo burger — a healthy serving of beef, cheese, barbecue sauce and onion strings. Steve Ballmer, why do you want to spend so much money for Yahoo when you can get this Yahoo for $10.99? Here's my proof of purchase.

yahoo1099.jpg

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=358778&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Insight into the inner workings of Valleywag]]> Before I started working at Valleywag, my favorite posts were always the "too insidery" ones that gave a peek behind the curtain. Here's a brief excerpt from Valleywag's group chat today, as our fearless leader tried to change the topic from Apple's Web services to Cisco, the telecom giant which announced earnings today.

Owen T.
Can anyone tell me how many billions of dollars more Cisco makes than .Mac? Thank you.
Jordan G. http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/02/live-analysis-cisco-earnings-csco-in-line.html

Owen T.
Right. Thank god someone's working while you guys are debating .Mac.
Cisco tipster tells me that if Chambers uses phrase "cautiously optimistic" in conference call, it's time to run for the hills.
Campfire = audience of 4
Valleywag = audience of 100K plus a day

Jordan G.
We should make Campfire public

Nicholas C.
Gawker used to do that
sorta

Jordan G.
publish a transcript of the best moments from campfire

Nicholas C.
they'd pub IMterviews w/ each other

Owen T.
True. But until then SOMEONE FRICKING POST ABOUT CISCO PLEASE KTHXBAI.

Nicholas C.
Cisco earnings QL in

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=353504&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Jason Calacanis has "all the money"]]>
After warning me that he was coming to the CES Press Room and to "stay out of his face," blog blowhard Jason Calacanis stormed over to me to "introduce" himself and slam my boss and brag about how much money he has. Money can't buy you a snappy comeback, however.

When Calacanis was almost out the door, I yelled across the room, "Google's better!" — than Mahalo (there's your link, now quit your bitching), that is, the "human-powered" search engine that's currently keeping Calacanis off the street. Having no response, he slunk out the door to peals of laughter.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=342502&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Valleywag cub reporter calls TheStreet.com veteran a "jackass" — to his face]]> I'm sitting in the CES press lounge when my editor, Owen Thomas, sends me an email:

Find him and interview? - O.
——- Forwarded message ——-
From: Chaela Volpe
Date: Jan 7, 2008 1:35 PM
Subject: Gary Krakow joins TheStreet.com newsroom as Sr. Tech Correspondent, Reports Live from CES in Las Vegas
I announce to the table, which includes a few colleagues from Gizmodo, and early-rising PR guy Peter Shankman, "I love when my editors tell me to interview people and I have no idea who they are. Like this jackass — Gary Krakow from MSNBC. Who the hell is he? I have no idea." One of the guys across the table, who I don't know, starts staring at me and tosses his press badge on the table.
krakowbadgesmall.jpg

After a couple moments of silence, Shankman says, "This is the most surreal moment I've ever been witness to." Then, of course, he writes it up. Thanks, buddy.

By the way, Krakow has this to say about his new job:

Valleywag: Why'd you leave MSNBC?
Krakow: MSNBC wanted to go in a different direction. I needed more artistic freedom.
V: Does TheStreet still exist? Have you been paid yet?
K: Don't worry about my paycheck. The new, redesigned site will be up within a few weeks with a focus on video.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=341859&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Productivity, here I come!]]> phd120507s.gifValleywag very special correspondent Paul Boutin has been touting the advantages of huge computer monitors for years. He's been encouraging me to pick up a 22" Dell monitor ever since I started writing full time. Did you know that they're almost identical to Apple's fancy screens — for half the price? I didn't. Today's PhD comic lets me know just how productive I'll be when I trade in this tiny 15" notebook and get something with a huge screen. Sweeeeeeet!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=330631&view=rss&microfeed=true