<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, liberty media]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, liberty media]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/libertymedia http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/libertymedia <![CDATA[Liberty Media ready to pay $1.42 billion for AOL dialup business]]> Liberty Media CEO John Malone told the Financial Times his company is ready to swap its $1.42 billion stake in Time Warner in order to acquire AOL's dialup business. There's just one holdup. "Time Warner still needs to divide the business," Malone complained to the FT. Though it's been more than two years since Time Warner decided to turn AOL into an online advertising concern and abandon the Internet service provider business, AOL won't be completely split until early 2009. Malone isn't the only exec impatient for Time Warner's book keepers to hurry it up. AOL CEO Randy Falco was overheard last week griping: "When is New York going to sell us?"

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5056214&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Liberty Media: We'd take AOL's access business]]> During a conference call to reports Liberty Media's second-quarter earnings, CEO John Malone told analysts the company was open to exchanging its stake in Time Warner for AOL's online access business. Liberty owns 103 million Time Warner shares, or about 2.8 percent of the company. Such a swap would value AOL's access business at around $1.6 billion, lower than the $2 billion to $3 billion analysts say its worth. A swap would lower Time Warner's tax burden, however, possibly making the deal more attractive. Earlier this year, Liberty performed a similar swap with News Corp., trading its stake in the company for control over DirecTV.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5035940&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[IAC's Jason Rapp ends months of career purgatory at Gifts.com]]> Hail the survivor! We'd heard that IAC dealmaker Jason Rapp's career was on the rocks. Turns out it was just in a deep freeze. Rapp has been named CEO of minor IAC property Gifts.com. The holdup?

Legal wrangling over the splitup of Barry Diller's online conglomerate; a bitter spat between Diller and longtime backer John Malone of Liberty Media delayed the breakup. Gifts.com used to be run out of online retailer HSN, which is due to be separated; that left it headless, a good fit for the jobless. It's a good move for Rapp; we hear he'd been considering a junior position at Facebook, or running IAC's healthcare investments. Gifts.com may not be much — Compete.com lists its audience at below 1 millon, after a predictable spike in December — but at least Rapp gets a C-suite title.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5012294&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Barry Diller: I could be gone in a week]]> Barry_Diller.jpgBarry Diller's battle with Liberty Media head John Malone for control over IAC could be over in a week, Diller told a crowd at a Variety event yesterday. "It's very odd that two people who don't want to give up control of anything are giving control to a judge in Delaware," he said. "The wonderful thing about Delaware is they do it quickly. They make a decision quickly." Some shareholders might wish for the same alacrity from Diller.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=364041&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[What the Liberty fight reveals: Diller's no entrepreneur]]> Having borrowed his empire, Barry Diller is now living on borrowed time. Former cable baron John Malone's Liberty Media is trying to break the sophisticated financial arrangements which give Diller control over IAC, his online conglomerate. Diller calls the effort "insane," "hogwash." But here's the reality: Diller owns 28 percent of the company, while Liberty owns 24 percent, according to the company's most recent proxy statement. Liberty, however, controls nearly 60 percent of the company's voting stock. Diller, in turn, has the right to vote Liberty's shares. This complicated entanglement is what Liberty and Diller are fighting about. Far more interesting than the legalisms is what it shows about Diller — and why Diller's so unhappy about it.

A decade and a half ago, Diller was cast out of Hollywood's Paramount studio with nothing more than a PowerBook and a Gulfstream. He set out to become an entrepreneur, running his own show and building something new. Instead, he became a trader of assets. His first big trade: obtaining a hand-me-down home-shopping network, HSN, which Malone helped him buy. There his troubles began.

Since then, Diller's career has been of buying low and selling high: Ticketmaster, CitySearch, Match.com, Expedia, Ask.com, and the like. (He bought and sold Ticketmaster, in some form, an astounding seven times.) Can you name single hit that has emerged from Diller's own mind? Exactly. With Diller steering the wheel, IAC-borne startups like Gifts.com, Zwinky, 23/6, and the like have gone nowhere.

And yet Diller steadfastly fancies himself an entrepreneur, not a trader. Profiles constantly talk about how he zooms in on particular businesses, eager to offer the real managers running his businesses advice, desperate to somehow leave a mark on the things he bought with other people's money, as if they somehow belonged to him.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=350220&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Did Bill Miller sell out Barry Diller?]]> Word now comes that Liberty, former cable baron John Malone's company, has opportunistically paid $340 million for 14 million shares in Barry Diller's IAC, raising its stake to 30 percent. IAC, too, repurchased 6 million shares at the same time. That means that Diller must have begrudgingly consented to the sale; at the same time, he reached an agreement that prevented Malone from taking a bigger stake in the online conglomerate. But who was the seller?

An obvious guess: Bill Miller, Legg Mason's chief investment officer, is a famed tech investor, most noted for making an early bet on Amazon.com. But as a stock pick, IAC, has been a stinker, dropping 38 percent over the past year. And Legg Mason is one of only two institutional investors who could have easily parted with 20 million shares. (Lord Abbett, another mutual-fund company, is the only other.)

Miller has been unwinding his stake since March, so a sale would not be surprising. But it's a blow to Diller nonetheless. The media mogul has sought to boost his company's shares by splitting it into five more focused parts, targeting specific sectors of e-commerce. Shareholders would then choose which ones they want to invest in. Whoever sold that large stake to Liberty, whether Miller or anyone else, has signalled an obvious choice: none of the above.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=344210&view=rss&microfeed=true