<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, looksmart]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, looksmart]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/looksmart http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/looksmart <![CDATA[Winner of Edgeio auction another Web loser]]> The main thing anyone ever knew about Edgeio, an online classifieds startup, is that it launched Michael Arrington's career at TechCrunch. Desperate to find out more information about this "Web 2.0" thing he kept hearing about, Arrington started blogging, and eventually left Edgeio, swapping a 10 percent stake in TechCrunch for a 10 percent stake in Edgeio. Arrington's stake is now worthless — which I think would actually make Teare the savvier businessman here — and Edgeio's assets have been sold at auction.

The auction for the assets closed at $280,000, just $30,000 more than the open price, with only two bidders. This despite Teare's optimistic claim that: "a buyer will get a huge bargain at almost any price up to $6m. We had term sheets within the last 2 months and interest at valuations around $10m."

The winning bidder was LookSmart, which has itself been struggling to remain relevant after its early success in Internet advertising and search ten years ago. Arrington, who claims he has tried to avoid discussing his investments on TechCrunch, provides his own positive spin, saying he's "happy to see the assets move to a company with the resources to move the ideas forward." Of course, it's unclear what these so-called ideas are. Can anyone explain, really, what Edgeio did? At that price, LookSmart may well have just been bidding on the servers, office furniture, and links to the domain name from TechCrunch.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=336901&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[MySpace and LookSmart kick out the startups]]> LookSmart, a San Francisco-based online-ad company, signed a long-term deal on a South of Market office building in its 1999 dotcom heyday. Since then, it has struggled to fill the brick fortress located at 2nd and Brannan. The first answer was to set up the empty space into a startup incubator, attracting tenants with bubbly names like Mashery, Twistage, and LicketyShip. But it appears those startups are about to lose their space. As rumored, the San Francisco office of MySpace will be heading into the building, and LookSmart is using the chance to shuffle the startups out. A tipster tells us:

Everyone has to be gone by 11/14 to make room for Murdoch's crew. Startups are scrambling for new homes. LookSmart is "restructuring/downsizing" and moving into the space the startups were in, while MySpace will move into the posh digs LookSmart previously occupied.
But there might be another reason why Looksmart wants to kick out the startups:
Funny enough, as LookSmart downsizes, all the startups are growing. LookSmart employees looking to jump ship are being snatched up left and right by the startups on our floor. Easy enough for them, they only have to move their stuff down a flight of stairs ;)
With LookSmart's atrocious earnings report and a recent trend of selling off pieces of the company (like yesterday's all-cash sale of FindArticles to CNET), we don't blame LookSmart employees for jumping to up-and-coming businesses. Perhaps the LookSmart execs think that Rupert Murdoch won't be as likely to poach whoever's left. Ha!]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=320711&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[LookSmart's CEO resigns, with curious timing]]> David HillsThese days, LookSmart, the money-losing San Francisco-based search-advertising company, is better known as successful landlord to startups than a successful business. No wonder that CEO David Hills has resigned, ostensibly to start his own, less troubled concern. But his timing couldn't be worse. Just last month, LookSmart promised investors Hills would be on today's earnings call. Word of his resignation came yesterday. And yet he apparently submitted his walking papers on July 26. Why did LookSmart delay such critical news for so long? And what does Hills know about today's earnings call that made him so reluctant to participate?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=285425&view=rss&microfeed=true