<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, media relations]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, media relations]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/mediarelations http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/mediarelations <![CDATA[Facebook's Sheryl Sandberg dithers on Elliot Schrage hire]]> Elliot SchrageThat was fast. Not only has BoomTown confirmed our earlier report that Elliot Schrage, Google's top flack, had interviewed at Facebook; he's been hired, too, according to an internal memo sent by CEO Mark Zuckerberg from India. Which is odd: At a meeting earlier today, asked about the Valleywag item on Schrage, COO Sheryl Sandberg feigned ignorance about Schrage's interviewing for the job, but talked up what a great fit he'd be with her, given their shared Harvard, D.C., and Google backgrounds. First Sandberg threatens to shoot Valleywag, and now she's agreeing with us? At least one member of the Google PR team concurs with Sandberg on this much: Better that he go to Facebook than stay at Google.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=387452&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Elliot Schrage, Google's top flack, interviewing at Facebook]]> Elliot SchrageAre Elliot Schrage and Sheryl Sandberg about to stage a policy-wonk reunion in Palo Alto? When she worked at Google, Sandberg, now Facebook's COO, helped recruit Schrage from the Council on Foreign Relations. Having taken charge of Facebook PR, Sandberg is looking to hire a VP of communications with experience in public policy. Since most Valley flacks are weak in knowing the ways of D.C., that job description is tailor-made for Schrage. Sources tell us he has already interviewed at Facebook. And we hear he's more than ready to leave Google, chiefly because of its philanderrific CEO, Eric Schmidt.

It's not the fact that the married Schmidt sleeps around that bothers Schrage (and most of his underlings in Google PR); it's how Schmidt mixes business and pleasure. His recent mistress, Marcy Simon, was temporarily installed in Google's New York office to head up PR for Google's still-nonexistent Googlephone. Simon's replacement, TV journalist Kate Bohner, has squired Schmidt, very publicly, to at least one political debate cosponsored by Google's YouTube and CNN. If Schrage wanted to deal with bimbo eruptions, he could have stayed in politics.

It's not clear Schrage is the best choice for the Facebook job, objectively speaking. One person who's worked with him says he's a disaster as a manager, and not particularly strong in the PR part of his duties, preferring the more high-falutin' policy work.

But that could make him the perfect yes-man to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's plans for world amelioration. At the South by Southwest conference, Zuckerberg talked, tongue not at all in cheek, about how Facebook could bring peace to the Middle East by preventing Arab teenages from turning into terrorists. He seems to believe sincerely in this stuff. And if it gets him a job at Facebook, Schrage is just slick enough to put on the illustion that he does, too.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=387224&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Why Mark Zuckerberg isn't saying anything]]> I agree with the popular take on Sarah Lacy's Zuckerberg interview at SXSW to this degree: The audience was revolting. Lacy threw an unbecomingly petulant tantrum on stage. But the Twitter reaction was equally self-indulgent. The debates over her performance obscured the man who should have been under the microscope: Mark Zuckerberg. As a speaker, Facebook's CEO is trying to model himself after Steve Jobs. He's gotten help from Bill Clinton's former speaking coach. But so far, all he's learned is the fine art of saying nothing.

A criticism leveled at Lacy: She didn't ask tough questions. That charge is baseless. Zuckerberg just didn't answer the tough questions she posed. "We're not focused on that," said Zuckerberg in what's becoming his now-standard dodge. Zuckerberg couldn't articulate what Facebook was focused on, except for vague talk of "building a platform." (As panel host Heather Gold proved at a later session with Twitter's Evan Williams, if you ask a startup founder what a platform actually is, you'll never get a meaningful answer.)

A second critique: There was no real news. Lacy did herself no favors by trying to argue that getting Zuckerberg to confirm old revelations, like Yahoo's offer to buy Facebook, constituted a scoop. Facebook à la française? Quelle surprise.

What Zuckerberg needs to learn from his hero: The art of saying something. Jobs keeps his magic alive by only appearing on stage when he has something to announce. Zuckerberg is the boss; he could have held news for this event, or pushed to get products launched in time for him to talk about them.

At his keynote yesterday, Zuckerberg talked a good game about learning to be a CEO, giving up direct oversight of the product in exchange for "setting the tone" for Facebook. He's talking a good game — but under pressure, he reverts to geek form. Later today at SXSW, Zuckerberg is crashing a Facebook developer meetup, where he's going to take questions — the Q&A the audience howled for at the end of Lacy's interview.

Doesn't he have an evangelist to whom he can delegate the mundane task of placating needy Web programmers? He does, but he won't. For Zuckerberg, talking shop comes naturally. Running one is hard.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=365932&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Garlinghouse family takes over Yahoo]]> Brad Garlinghouse, the controversial Yahoo executive who won fame by accusing management of spreading investments around like a "thin layer of ... peanut butter", has a sister, Meg, who also works at the company. Who got whom the job at Yahoo is a matter of testy debate. What's undebatable: the brother-and-sister duo practically own Yodel Anecdotal, the company blog, this month. Three full posts are devoted to their glories.

Couldn't Yahoo have found someone besides Garlinghouse frère and soeur to write about? Perhaps not. With all the defections, the company has fewer and fewer stars to draw on. CEO Jerry Yang is press-shy, and President Sue Decker is downright mediaphobic. Flaunt what you've got.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=338210&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA["Webgemeinde baffles" at Googler wedding]]> Back when we had party correspondent Megan McCarthy to kick around, I made a point of assigning her all interviews with the German press. But now Leggy's headed to Wired, so when Der Spiegel called to interview me about Larry and Lucy's wedding, I had to handle it myself. And I think I acquitted myself pretty well. I think. The Google translation was a little unclear. "Webgemeinde baffles," indeed. Larry, when you get back, could you get someone working on this?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=331656&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Facebook faces "60 Minutes" inquisition]]> Facebook has bigger problems than the possibility of an FTC inquiry. 60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl recently visited the company's Palo Alto offices, says Kara Swisher of AllThingsD. According to Swisher, Stahl interviewed CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Chris Kelly, the network's chief privacy officer. Which can only mean one thing: A major exposé on Facebook coming soon on the hard-hitting CBS news show. Don't think it's serious?

Then just remember Razorfish. What's that? You don't remember Razorfish? Exactly. Jeff Dachis, former CEO of the online ad agency, was crucified on television by a 60 Minutes episode in which he proved unable to define what, exactly, his dotcom did to earn its keep. "We've asked our clients to recontextualize their business," said Dachis. Gotcha. While the 60 Minutes appearance wasn't the only thing that did Razorfish in, Dachis's company, once worth $4 billion, was soon sold for $8.2 million. Let's hope Zuckerberg fares better on camera.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=328112&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Hoosier daddy? Indiana reporter trades university beat for university job]]> When we first began to cover the many close relationships between flauntrepreneur Scott Jones's ChaCha search engine and Indiana University, the Indiana Herald-Times was one of the few local newspapers to closely question the relationship. Steve Hinnefeld of the Herald-Times was even following Valleywag's coverage, and came to similar conclusions: Although nothing legally wrong occurred, IU officials' failure to disclose their ChaCha ties was suspicious. However, since then the newspaper has provided the issue little attention. Why?

We've learned that Hinnefeld, referred to as the "IU watchdog" for the Herald-Times, left the newspaper for a media relations position at ... Indiana University. Surprise, surprise. It's reassuring to know that Nick Denton isn't alone in hiring his critics. When Owen Thomas tires of me writing about ChaCha, I look forward to a comfy desk job in lovely Bloomington, Indiana.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=320114&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Robert Scoble is still hungry]]>
Attention, PR professionals: Want to get to the top of Techmeme? We gave you the four-word version of videoblogger Robert Scoble's whiteboard frenzy: Take Scoble to dinner. Don't believe us? Here's a more watchable 80-second snippet of Scoble's video, which I'm posting despite this protest from Valleywag special correspondent Paul Boutin: "No one watches bloggers on video. Unless they're in their underwear." The clip is even funnier if you imagine the monster plant from Little Shop of Horrors singing "Feed Me" as you watch.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=313542&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Yahoo and Facebook execs MIA at OutCast party]]>
OutCast PR held an AfterHours party at Frisson, the restaurant co-owned by Facebook board member Peter Thiel. So cozy, since Facebook is OutCast's biggest new client! The place was overrun with hacks and flacks. No surprise, since OutCast wants to show off its chummy press relationships, and other flacks are drawn to journalists like moths to flames. And, of course, OutCast wanted to keep things well-staffed to watch over reporters chatting up executives from Facebook and Yahoo, another big OutCast client. No need, it turned out.

Why was the event heavy on the storytellers and light on subjects? "All these fucking PR people!" one friend. "It's like walking through a pig trough."

The biggest Yahoo personality was "peanut butter manifesto" author Brad Garlinghouse, who was spotted deep in a long conversation with AllThingsD's Kara Swisher in a corner by the bar. The biggest name on the Facebook side? Spokeswoman Brandee Barker, who was quite a fan of the photo booth (and, apparently, Swisher, whom she pried away from Garlinghouse for some close contact).

No surprise, really. Yahoo and Facebook executives were likely distracted by negotiations over taking a stake in Facebook. And really, OutCast couldn't have planned it better: The Valley's press corps was drinking and eating instead of staking out restaurants and hotels in Palo Alto. Brilliant!

Indeed, the number and cailber of the journalists who appeared says something about the spell they've cast over the tech media. Spotted in the crowd: author and BusinessWeek columnist Sarah Lacy, GigaOm's Om Malik, USA Today's Janet Kornblum, Michael Bazeley of the San Jose Mercury News, Jessica Guynn of the LA Times, Bloomberg's Ed Robinson and Wall Street Journal reporters Vauhini Vara and Don Clark. On the less-prestigious side, Red Herring editor Joel Dreyfuss was there, and upon meeting me, instantly began haranguing me for our coverage of his publication's death spiral. "Why didn't you cover Business 2.0?" he asked, alluding to that magazine's recent disintegration. Um, I thought we had?

Ubiquitous videoblogger Robert Scoble showed up. I asked after his newborn son and inquired about how online-video startup PodTech, his ostensible employer, was faring. "Much better than last month," he replied. "Wait, what happened last month?" I asked. "John got fired!" he shot back, shocked that I had forgotten such a momentous occasion. Wait, fired? Didn't John Furrier, PodTech's founder and former CEO, "step down"? You learn something new at every one of these parties.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=310477&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Um, magazine editors? Your cover is already blown]]> Magazines, whose bread and butter used to be breaking news (exclusive photos) or making news (silly pronouncements like "Person of the Year"), are scrambling to beef up the security wall between their content and the Internet. But let's face facts: The exclusive is dead. Embargoes are pointless. Computers isolated from the Internet, armed guards, and nondisclosure agreements do nothing to sate the public's insatiable appetite for content. Blogs, on the other hand, are all too happy to feed it. Rather than increasing useless security measures, old media would be better served going with the flow by building open communities. Fortunately, at least one magazine editor, Richard Stengel of Time, gets it.


Stengel observes the benefits provided by Internet leaks: Internet chatter builds buzz. And speculation just increases interest:

In a way, it's a much huger smokescreen now.
Prerelease chatter also builds anticipation for content:
There's a benefit of something leaking out in small ways before, because I think it increases interest.
Now if only the rest of the inbred world of magazine editors would stop obsessing about protecting their content, and thinking instead about how to get it read. It should be obvious, but it bears saying: The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=306730&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Don't mess with Michael Arrington]]> Prickly TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington is given to griping about PR people and their capricious rules. But he's not above setting his own rules when it comes to his TechCrunch40 conference. Specifically, presenting companies have been required to observe a press embargo until their turn on stage, and violators may be yanked from the lineup. With only 10 companies left to go, it seems like most of the startups have been sheepishly obedient to this rule. Anyone get yanked? Let us know. The full rules and regulations after the jump.

Subject: TechCrunch40 Conference: Final Details and Embargoed Information Release Schedule

Dear Members of the Press,

Michael, Jason and I look forward to hosting you at the TechCrunch40 Conference this coming Monday-Tuesday, September 17-18 at the Palace Hotel. We're incredibly proud of our line-up of start-up companies to be unveiled over our two day agenda and look forward to your critical eyes.

As you can imagine, our 40 presenting companies and 100 DemoPit participants are incredibly anxious to reach out to you during the conference. Since the format of our agenda is a bit different from other conferences, we wanted to share additional details about logistics and embargos to help make sure we communicate expectations to all clearly.

IMPORTANT Embargoed Information

9 am PST Monday, September 17

Press may release the names of the 39 companies selected for TechCrunch40 starting at 9 am pst, Monday September 17. We have elected one wildcard presentation slot that will be based on "audience choice voting" from the 100 DemoPit companies pitching in the Gold Ballroom. The 40th company will present during the last demo slot on the agenda, Tuesday afternoon. All 40 companies are eligible to win the TechCrunch40 $50,000 grand prize to be selected by our expert advisors and TechCrunch40 team.

Individual Company Embargoes, Rolling Based on On-Stage Presentations

Press may release coverage about the 39 companies individually starting with their respective on-stage presentations at the conference. Companies will not be launching their sites to the public until they go on stage to present. We reserve the right to pull any presenting company that does not comply with these policies. We will have classroom seating in rows reserved at the front of the Grand Ballroom exclusively for Press, and we will be providing dedicated Internet access to Press vs the general audience to facilitate live blogging at the event, etc.

Press Registration and Press Room

Press will be invited to check-in at the Ralston Room of the Palace Hotel (to the right of the Garden Court) starting at 7 am. The program guide and techcrunch40.com will have complete information about the TechCrunch40 companies.

We have a dedicated Press Room in the Sacramento Room on Mezzanine Level of the Palace Hotel open 7 am - 7 pm each Monday and Tuesday exclusively for your use.

We're really anxious to start the show. See you soon,

—Jason, Michael and Heather

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301164&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Esther Wojcicki, did your journalism degree teach you disclosure?]]> esther wojcickiHuffington Post's Esther Wojcicki gushes over Google's Lunar X Prize. It's not the $30 million those nice Google boys, Larry and Sergey, are offering whomever can successfully land a rover on the moon. This Palo Alto schoolmarm is keen on all the teaching tools the Lunar X Prize is providing educators. She writes, "The team at the Lunar Xprize has prepared free learning guides, videos and other resources to help stimulate student interest not only in space but in math, science and technology as well." She sees this as an effort to rectify the "anti-science trend in schools." Google's efforts are all well and good, but there's another reason why this journalism teacher is so sweet on Larry Page and Sergey Brin — she's Brin's mother-in-law. Her daughter Anne married him in May. But the Google ties go even deeper. Her daughter Susan Wojcicki is Google's VP of product managementand Susan's garage in Menlo Park served as the search engine's first headquarters. Even daughter Janet is married to a former Googler.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300210&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The solitary life of an Apple PR staffer]]> Shhh!After reading Tuesday's post on Apple unresponsive PR department, a tipster sent us the following juicy tidbit about the miserable life of Apple's PR staff. Apparently, they're kept almost as unenlightened as the press they work so hard to keep away. And a social life? Forget about it. More after the jump:

I never ran this myself, but through a friend of a friend I heard that Apple PR teams are not allowed to communicate internally with one another, i.e. the iPod PR people are not allowed to know what iMac PR people are up to. It is totally divide-and-conquer inside the company.

Externally, you're also not supposed to cultivate relationships with journalists. It's the complete opposite of other vendors. In fact, my friend said, if you're an Apple PR person and you are seen in the company of a journalist, at a party or any place other than an Apple event, you better have a good reason why.

The whole "friend of a friend" aspect has us wary, so we called and checked with Steve Dowling, the head of corporate PR for Apple. Or rather, we left a voicemail for him. As you can probably guess, Apple has not yet returned calls for comment.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=296830&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The best PR gig in the Valley]]> An article in Ad Age purports to expose something that every Valley reporter has long known, but never come out and said: Apple's PR department is the biggest group of slackers to grace the tech world. What, exactly, do they do all day long? It's a mystery. For the uninitiated reporter looking to get a quote, the list of Apple PR contacts, complete with direct-dial numbers, seems heaven-sent. But don't get too excited. Every call goes straight to voicemail, like the entire PR department paid its credit card bill late and is now ducking the collection agency. If you leave a voicemail, reporters say, it more often than not disappears into the ether, never to be returned.

As Ad Age points out: "if you Google 'Apple did not return calls,' you'll come up with 2.35 million hits." That claim is more than a bit sloppy. The exact phrase "Apple did not return calls" returns 3,100 hits. But still, Apple makes the rest of the Valley look like pikers when it comes to withering silence. "Google did not return calls" calls up 978 hits, while "Yahoo did not return calls" comes in at a mere 82 results.

Even if you're able to get through, Apple's PR department is notoriously difficult to work with. As one Silicon Valley reporter told me "If they designed the iPod, every time you went to play a song, the thing would call your parents to ask why your taste in music is terrible, and then, a week later, let you listen to 5 seconds of the song."

So, if you need to get a quote for your story, what should you do? If you're a newbie, you're screwed. Save yourself time, and as you leave your fruitless, pro forma voicemail, create a macro to autotype "Apple did not return calls." Been at this beat for a while? Bypass the PR department altogether, and just IM Steve Jobs himself.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=296273&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Google is inviting "consumer and broadcast...]]> Google is inviting "consumer and broadcast media" — but not hardbitten business and technology reporters — to an October party for the press. "It's a party for horny tech nerds who want cute girls to show up," says one invitee. [New York Post]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=295191&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The blogger-focused BlogWorld tradeshow and...]]> Reuters]]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=292808&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Shanghaied LinkedIn founder misses a photo shoot]]> reid%20hoffman%20linkedin.jpgJoi ItoValleywag hears that LinkedIn, which has largely missed out on the social-networking buzz, is getting ready for its closeup. Employees were getting lensed today at a photo shoot, which is usually a sign that a company's about to get the cover treatment, or at least a major feature story, from a big business publication. Missing at the shoot, however, was LinkedIn founder and president of products Reid Hoffman, who recently stepped out of the LinkedIn CEO chair. Hoffman, a tipster says, is away in Shanghai, with friend Joi Ito, the Six Apart backer pictured here to his right, purportedly looking for new startups to invest in.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=292506&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Long-suffering Facebook spokesprofile Brandee...]]> Long-suffering Facebook spokesprofile Brandee Barker, besieged by a string of PR disasters, has hired some much-needed professional help. Personnel from OutCast Communications, the PR firm that helped launch Salesforce.com, are now listed as "officers" of Facebook's official group for journalists. [Facebook]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=289932&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Second Life gets a well-deserved drubbing in Time]]> Are you a Linden?Linden Lab CEO Philip Rosedale is learning, the hard way, how a charm offensive can turn, well, offensive. The man behind virtual world Second Life may have staged BusinessWeek's glowing visions of the future and Newsweek's virtual wet kiss, but now comes the backlash. Following Wired's recent expose on fleeting marketers, Time's Kristina Dell takes a crack at taking out Second Life.


Dell is hardly a stealthy assassin. She telegraphs her strikes. We already know that Second Life's user base is highly inflated (8.7 million registered users, but only 600,000 are considered active). We know that Second Life has been hyped to hell and back and hasn't lived up to advertisers' expectations (American Apparel and Starwood Hotels have pulled out entirely). And we know it's facing a slew of legal troubles (FBI crackdown on gambling, the German police are investigating a child pornography ring, and there's continued talk of levying taxes on virtual sales).

But the deadliest mine buried in the Time article is the fact that Linden Lab, itself, is trying to find some way to instill control over its world. "The dilemma for Linden Lab," writes Dell, "is how to rein in its creation without alienating hard-core users." The griefers — people who smeared John Edward's campaign headquarters with feces or launched a flying penis assault on virtual land baron Anshe Chung — are making the environment inhospitable to new users, who provide a valuable audience, and advertisers, who rent space in Second Life to reach them. (Linden Lab makes its money by charging as much as $1,675 a month for a plot of land.) But any effort to thrust laws and regulations upon the populace defeats the entire premise that Second Life is built upon — it's a world where you can be anyone and do anything, or vice versa.

Time's writer ultimately disappoints. Dell ends playing with her prey, like cat with mouse, but she doesn't go in for the kill. We're glad, however, to assist. There's no way for Second Life to meet its promises to both users and advertisers. Linden Lab CEO Rosedale's campaign to win back the press has stalled and failed.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=288879&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Hear Steve Jobs and obey, filthy hacks!]]> When Fake Steve Jobs — sorry, I mean Dan Lyons of Forbes — parodies real Apple CEO Steve Jobs's imperious view of Silicon Valley's subservient press corps, it's so over the top that some might think he's kidding. But he's not, as this exchange with a reporter from today's keynote, where he announced new hardware and software products, handily demonstrates:
HACK: How are you going to market this out to the customer base to make sure they understand the integration between the apps?
JOBS: That's what you're here for! To write about our products.
(Photoillustration by Jesus Diaz for Gizmodo)]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=287007&view=rss&microfeed=true