<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, pepsi]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, pepsi]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/pepsi http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/pepsi <![CDATA[Madison Avenue suddenly suspicious that banner ads don't work]]> Pepsi.jpgEye-tracking studies show users tend to ignore content contained in banner ads. The news has ad agencies wondering whether display advertising — Yahoo's bread and butter, Google's hopes and dreams — is worth the money. That's idea behind Matthew Creamer's 2,274-word opus in Advertising Age. The 100-word version goes:

The Internet is too often viewed as inventory, as a place where brands pay for the privilege of being adjacent to content. The marketer, once at the mercy of a locked-up media landscape, can now be a player in it. In other words, marketers can build websites that do cool, useful stuff. Matt Freeman, CEO of Tribal DDB cites Pepsi, one of Tribal's clients, as an example of a company that could be a giant media player if it wanted.
The three-word version: Britney Spears videos.]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368888&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Amazon and Pepsi to pair up for music giveaway]]> Amazon.com and Pepsi have teamed up for a year-long free music promotion, very similar to one Apple and Pepsi had several years ago. The promotion, scheduled for a Super Bowl launch, will have consumers collecting five Pepsi bottle caps for one free music track from Amazon. In short, Amazon is making a major play against iTunes. The Super Bowl is the highest-profile advertising venue in the world, and Amazon will get tons of attention from the Pepsi promotion. For free music, plenty of people will take advantage of the promo — but will they stick around to buy music when it's finished?

Amazon has captured 3 percent of the digital download market since its music download store launched to little fanfare in September. The store did force Apple to drop the prices on its DRM-free music to the standard 99 cents, but it's had little impact besides that. Amazon certainly has the name recognition to make a store work, but with iTunes and the iPod so overwhelmingly in control of the music player market, it will be a tough sell to get the average iPod owner to download a song from Amazon, copy it into iTunes and then load it on his iPod. Three steps to get a song versus one step with iTunes? Apple actually licensed Amazon's 1-Click technology for the iTunes Store. Too bad Jeff Bezos has forgotten what he taught Steve Jobs.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=329973&view=rss&microfeed=true