<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, peter chernin]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, peter chernin]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/peterchernin http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/peterchernin <![CDATA[AOL Outcast Jon Miller to Join News Corp.'s Soap Opera in Progress]]> Rupert Murdoch's media empire continues its turmoil after the announcement of COO Peter Chernin's departure. The newest player: Former AOL CEO Jon Miller, who's widely expected to take the top digital job there.

A sign of how insular the world of big media is: Confirmation of Miller's job offer comes from Ross Levinsohn, who held much the same job before leaving News Corp. to start a venture-capital fund with Miller.

It's all a crazy waiting game until the aging mogul can install his wayward children in power. Most believe that's the reason why Chernin left, as it grew increasingly clear that Murdoch would never let the Hollywood hired hand become CEO of News Corp. But there are plenty of takers for the big jobs available in the meantime.

Miller replaces Fox Interactive Media chief Peter Levinsohn, who, as many inside News Corp. expected, is taking a job with the L.A.-based Fox TV and movie units. Miller, though, will have more power than Levinsohn, running pretty much everything with a URL attached and reporting directly to Murdoch. He'll need that authority to rein in wayward MySpace CEO Chris DeWolfe, who has long resisted reporting to the suits rotating through the executive suite of Fox Interactive Media.

If he takes the job, that is. Papers aren't signed yet, for reasons that are mostly legalese. Miller was ousted as AOL's CEO in 2006, replaced by the astoundingly awful Randy Falco. He's since been looking for a comeback, most recently through the VC firm Velocity Interactive Group — but he's been stymied by a noncompete agreement with AOL parent Time Warner, whose CEO, Jeff Bewkes, nastily decided to enforce after Yahoo invited Miller to join its board.

That noncompete ends in three days. Assuming Miller accepts the offer, and it seems like it would be enormously embarrassing for him not to, he'd be ending one long-running drama and joining another.

(Photo via LAT)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5187984&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Who'll replace Jerry Yang? Chernin hot, Decker not ]]> Why would the President and COO of News Corp. take a job running Yahoo? Money, of course, but does Yahoo have that much? Nonetheless, relentless Yahoo blogger Kara Swisher reports that Peter Chernin is "the No. 1 choice of most inside and outside Yahoo." Swisher says Yahoo's current President, Sue Decker, is being "considered" for the job, which in Valleyspeak means she's not being considered at all. Kara lists another seven potential Chief Yahoos. Kara's even more obsessive about Yahoo than Owen, so you click her and I'll go back to looking for caption contests.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5091936&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Jerry Yang out as Yahoo CEO]]> Yahoo founder Jerry Yang is stepping down as CEO, and a search is underway for a replacement after a tumultuous 18 months on the job. Which is curious. In a recent interview, Yang had just told AllThingsD's Kara Swisher, "In this uncertain environment, I think I am absolutely the right person" to lead Yahoo. He must have changed his mind; Swisher reports that the decision was a "mutual" one made by Yang and Yahoo's board of directors. Either Yang was lying to Swisher, or he was deceived about the board's lack of support for him. Executive recruiter Heidrick & Struggles is conducting a search for Yang's replacement. Finding a successor to Yang will be difficult — not because Yang is irreplaceable, but because he has made such a mess of things that it will be hard to persuade a capable executive to risk their reputation fixing it.

There are, nevertheless, some possibilities.

One is former eBay CEO Meg Whitman, who has been toying with entering politics. eBay and Yahoo have long flirted with a merger, so she's reasonably familiar with the company, and with the challenges of running a large Internet company.

A similar candidate: Jon Miller, the former CEO of AOL, who is now a partner at Velocity Interactive Group, a venture-capital firm. Money is tight in venture capital, and Velocity has yet to raise a promised new fund in the multiple hundreds of millions of dollars it had planned for when he joined it. Yet Miller has a problem: Time Warner, the parent of AOL, used his noncompete agreement to prevent him from joining Yahoo's board; it's not clear why they would waive it to let him become CEO. The agreement does not expire until next spring.

News Corp. COO Peter Chernin does not seem to have much hope of succeeding Rupert Murdoch as CEO, who is expected to hand the media conglomerate over to one of his children instead. But he does not have a credible claim for having much online experience — overseeing MySpace is the best he can do there.

And lastly, as a courtesy, Yahoo's president, Sue Decker, is under consideration. Some say Decker's Machiavellian maneuverings helped out former Hollywood studio boss Terry Semel as CEO last summer. But she's seen inside and outside the company as a bad manager who lacks a vision for what Yahoo should be.

More:

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5091503&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[MySpace launches a self-serve ad network, hopes you like banners]]> Two weeks after News Corp COO Peter Chernin told an audience in New York that MySpace ads are ahead of target, the site launched a self-serve ad system at advertising.myspace.com. Aimed primarily at musicians and small businesses, the ads start at a $25 minimum for a campaign. The big difference from Google's AdWords: MySpace ads only link to other MySpace pages. Here's a summary of Mashable's writeup on the system:

  • Ads are banners, not text — either 728×90 or 300×250.
  • The ads must link to another MySpace page, rather than offsite.
  • Minimum campaign buy: $25
  • The ad system seems tied to the pending launch of MySpace Music, a venture with the Big Four record labels.
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5053977&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[3 reasons nobody buys ads on MySpace unless they have to]]> News Corp. COO Peter Chernin told Wall Street investors yesterday that social network MySpace is selling ads "above where we expected" and better than the rest of the marketplace. Which is funny, because a Madison Avenue's interactive ad agency exec was just telling me the other day that "you buy MySpace only if you have to. If there's an alternative, go for it." There are three reasons why.

  • Though MySpace has worked hard to improve its overall site design, its been plagued by spam-happy advertisers and banner-ad schemesters from its very beginning. Because of that and the site's junky-looking past (and we think present), MySpace remains a "tarnished" brand. Brand managers don't want to soil their own through association.
  • Ad buyers tend to buy ads from people they know. MySpace's ad sales force has had a lot of turnover and its been hard to form relationships with them, says our guy.
  • Though our guy doesn't use it, the people in his agency who do tell him MySpace's vaunted ad-targeting technology called "Hypertargeting" doesn't work. Sure, its good enough at telling an ad buyer who are the users who would visit the page on which the ad would appear, but it doesn't help to make sure the ad fits within the page's context. "Are [users] seeing the ad? Or are they trained to ignore it?" Also, our guy has some branding advice for MySpace. Get rid of the "hyper" in "hypertargeting." Like as if it were called Xtreme Targeting, the "hyper" makes it sound like News Corp is trying to dress up the technology as more than it is. Which, of course, it probably is.
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5047942&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Eric Schmidt admits MySpace remains junk]]> Schmidt_Thumb.jpgBack in August 2006, when Google agreed to pay News Corp. $900 million to serve ads against MySpace, News Corp. COO Peter Chernin bragged, "Whoever said it remains to be seen whether we can monetize [MySpace], hopefully it's a little clearer this week." Almost two years later, "monetizing" MySpace seems more difficult than ever. At least, according to Google CEO Eric Schmidt. "MySpace did not monetize as well as we thought," Schmidt told a German reporter.
We have a lot of traffic, a lot of page views, but it is harder than we thought to get our ad network to work with social networks. When you are in social network, it is not likely that you'll buy a washing machine. It is not a long term problem but it is taking us longer than we thought.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=393656&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[A MySpace advertiser responds to News Corp.'s excuses]]> chernin.jpgWhen News Corp. announced its Fox Interactive division — the unit built around MySpace — would miss its targets, COO Peter Chernin offered three excuses reasons why. Since we noted them yesterday, an agency exec whose clients advertise on MySpace took a moment to respond to Chernin's three points:

  • Chernin: MySpace users click around so much and create so many pageviews that ad inventory supply outweighs advertiser demand. Ad buyer:
    Not unique to them. Networks have tons of inventory, search has tons of inventory. Untargeted or contextualized inventory is hard to sell. Targeted, contextualized inventory is in demand and should continue to be. My Space has enough professional content to be attractive for big brands. Their "hyper-targeting" is effective.
  • Chernin: It's hard to tell why a particular user is using MySpace, so targeting ads are difficult. Ad buyer:
    True. And social networks may not provide the diversity and revenue potential as other segments like search or networks which have specific high value content and audiences like upscale travel or mortgage buyers. Social networks still offer the hard to reach young audience and entertainment and telecommunications advertisers are among the biggest online. There is room for social networks to learn how to be more effective with their target audiences as regards advertising reception and impact. It is a very new channel, fair to need more time to learn. I do firmly believe in the long term viability and value of social networks for marketing.
  • Chernin: FIM is having a hard time coming up with convincing metrics to sell advertisers on the value of a friend's recommendation. Ad buyer:
    Well we do believe that word of mouth and peer pass along and influencing is genuinely valuable, but again hard to quantify. MySpace did do a good study with a third party called 'Never Ending Friending'that was a step in the right direction.

Finally, we asked what News Corp. ought to be doing to boost its sales. Our source responded:

We do use MySpace. Our clients are interested. We like their hyper-targeting and expanded content channels like TV and music. I think for MySpace it's about the novelty of their channel and the need to figure out how to position the product and deliver value to clients in a tangible way.
In other words, if MySpace could figure out how to boost advertisers' sales, it might be having less trouble with its own.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=388941&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[News Corp. exec explains why MySpace traffic rose, revenues dropped]]> Chernin-Thumb.jpgSomehow, Fox Interactive revenues dropped last quarter despite traffic to MySpace, the News Corp. Web unit's main property, growing. News Corp. chairman Peter Chernin offered three excuses:
  • MySpace users click around so much and create so many pageviews that ad inventory supply outweighs advertiser demand.
  • It's hard to tell why a particular user is using MySpace, so targeting ads are difficult.
  • FIM is having a hard time coming up with convincing metrics to sell advertisers on the value of a friend's recommendation.
What Chernin didn't explain: Which of these excuses didn't hold true for the previous quarter, when revenues were higher.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=388447&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Chernin and Murdoch protest talks with Microsoft, Yahoo and AOL too much]]> RupertMurdoch.jpgHow badly does News Corp. want to move MySpace out the door? During yesterday's quarterly earnings call with analysts, News Corp. president and COO Pete Chernin and chairman Rupert Murdoch said they haven't discussed a merging properties with Microsoft, AOL or Yahoo in quite some time. Like maybe 14 days. Chernin: "I have not had a conversation with Microsoft or AOL in a couple of weeks." Rupert Murdoch "Nor have I." Silicon Alley Insider doesn't believe the disclaimers, reminding us that at the end of the last quarter, Murdoch denied interest in Yahoo even as he'd ordered a team to make the deal happen.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=388424&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[News Corp.'s Chernin on Fox Interactive's $1 billion target: "Yes, we will fall short"]]> chernin.jpgFox Interactive Media, News Corp.'s Web division overseeing properties including MySpace, Photobucket and Rotten Tomatoes, saw its revenues drop in the second quarter to $210 million., from $233 million in the previous quarter. News Corp. president and COO told analysts today that the division would not meet its $1 billion revenue goal for its fiscal year, likely coming up $100 million short. He began the call: "Let me begining by saying yes, we will fall short of what were very aggressive projections." Insiders whisper that News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch set the numbers high to put pressure on MySpace CEO Chris DeWolfe. DeWolfe and MySpace friend-in-chief Tom Anderson signed a two-year, $30 million contract last fall to continue running the site.


]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=388263&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[MySpace pair get $50 million for losing ground to Facebook]]> Back for a beatingA News Corp. source is confirming that MySpace honchos Tom Anderson and Chris DeWolfe — the site's founders in name, if not in fact — have signed new contracts. How much did it take to keep the pair from bolting MySpace, even as it keeps losing ground to rival social network Facebook? It's been reported the pair demanded two-year deals worth $50 million each, but word is they got about half that. Even then, are they worth it? Here's a graph that will keep News Corp. investors awake at night.

Rumor has it that News Corp. COO Peter Chernin was against bringing Anderson and DeWolfe back. Good to know someone within Rupert Murdoch's empire is capable of reading a traffic chart.

(Photo by AP)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=311938&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA["YouTube could do a much more aggressive...]]> "YouTube could do a much more aggressive job about taking down content that is a copyright violator... It's pretty safe to say that [Google has] the technology available... it's publicly available and I haven't yet heard a lot about Google being technologically constrained." — News Corp. president and COO Peter Chernin [FT]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=306853&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Being either too aggressive or too compliant...]]> Reuters]]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300152&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Peter Chernin puts the kibosh on a MySpace/Yahoo swap]]> MySpaceDespite rumors to the contrary, News Corp. president Peter Chernin says there are no talks and no deal. His boss, Rupert Murdoch, was reportedly thinking about trading MySpace for a 25 percent stake in Yahoo.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=298752&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The great iTunes revolt]]> UprisingIf it's not a feud, it's a very strange friendship. News Corp. president Peter Chernin says, "We're the ones who should determine what the fair price for our product is, not Apple." He's speaking, of course, of the massive Fox library of TV shows and movies his company controls, and Apple's penchant for uniform pricing for video downloads. A translation of Chernin's comments: "We're staying put for now, but watch your a**, Steve Jobs." While Apple has sold 1 million iPhones and over 100 million iPods, its storefront is replaceable (Amazon Unbox, Microsoft's Xbox 360 Marketplace, Joost, etc.). Content partners like NBC are not. Apple best do what it can to quell this proletariat uprising before things get out of hand. What exactly would Apple do for its video iPods and iPhones if studios went on "strike?" Probably let users contentedly fill their devices with pirated BitTorrent downloads.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=298681&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Chris DeWolfe's misplaced affection]]> MySpace co-founder Chris DeWolfe may not be your friend (that's the other co-founder, Tom Anderson), but he does hold a few powerful people near-and-dear. Including, Portfolio reports, Wendi Deng, the wife of News Corp. owner Rupert Murdoch. Portfolio surmises that DeWolfe's friendship with Deng might help convince her husband to meet DeWolfe and Anderson's $50M compensation demand to stick around for another year. We think that DeWolfe has the wrong target in mind. While it might be easier for him to spend time with Deng — they're both on the board of MySpace China — we think he should be buttering up News Corp heir apparent Peter Chernin, who recent fillings revealed to be the highest paid person at News Corp.]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=298179&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Oh no you di-in't! News Corp exec says MySpace runs Web 2.0]]> A news site quotes News Corp COO Peter Chernin saying Flickr, YouTube, and all the other popular content-sharing sites from the last few years are just suckling at the MySpace teat.

"If you look at virtually any Web 2.0 application, whether its YouTube, whether it's Flicker [sic], whether it's Photobucket or any of the next-generation Web applications, almost all of them are really driven off the back of MySpace," Chernin said at the conference. "There's no reason why we can't build a parallel business."

Oh, a smackdown and a threat! Here's what to expect:

News Corp. May Launch YouTube Rival [MultiChannel]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=200346&view=rss&microfeed=true