<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, piracy]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, piracy]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/piracy http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/piracy <![CDATA[Online News Theft a Truly Teeny-Tiny Problem]]> The Wall Street Journal is up in arms about it; the Associated Press is building a robot army to fight it. But it turns out online news piracy is at most a $250 million-per-year problem. Just how small is that?

About seven-tenths of one percent of total 2008 newspaper ad revenue of $38 billion. And that's assuming the worrywarts are correct; the $250 million number was provided to the New York Times by the CEO of an anti-news piracy startup Attributor which has an interest in over-estimating the size of the problem.

So solving the piracy problem overnight would do basically nothing to fix the news industry's woes, financially speaking. Strategically, it wouldn't help much, either, since sites that illegally copy wire stories tend to be very low-stakes operations, usually Google spammers trying to make small change via AdSense (see Wired's explanatory chart). More dangerous to newspapers is the explosion in Web outlets that give news without infringing on copyrights (with the possible exception of the Huffington Post, which could stand to dial back its "excerpting" a notch).

UPDATE:Recently departed nytimes.com general manager Vivian Schiller, now at NPR, tells Newsweek that "news is a commodity:"

I am a staunch believer that people will not in large numbers pay for news content online. It's almost like there's mass delusion going on in the industry-They're saying we really really need it, that we didn't put up a pay wall 15 years ago, so let's do it now. In other words, they think that wanting it so badly will automatically actually change the behavior of the audience. The world doesn't work that way. Frankly, if all the news organizations locked pinkies, and said we're all going to put up a big fat pay wall, you know what, more traffic for us. News is a commodity; I'm sorry to say.

(Disclaimer: Attributor CEO Jim Pitkow once headed Moreover, the syndication company co-founded by Gawker Media chief Nick Denton.)

(Pic via Ioan Sameli)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5323929&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[If You Steal His Books, Stephen King Will Mock You]]> Writers are getting mad as hell about digital versions of their books getting pirated online. Ursula K. Le Guin and Harlan Ellison will sue you. But we like horror mogul Stephen King's approach: insults!

Asked about digital piracy, King emailed Motoko Rich of the New York Times:

The question is, how much time and energy do I want to spend chasing these guys. And to what end? My sense is that most of them live in basements floored with carpeting remnants, living on Funions and discount beer.

Or reading novels by Cory Doctorow, the Boing Boing blogger with a little-known sideline in fiction. Doctorow doesn't mind if you copy his books — in fact, he gives them away. To guys living in basements floored with carpeting remnants, living on Funions and discount beer.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5251028&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Oscar Screener Piracy Less Of A Problem, Thanks To Regular Piracy]]> Since the MPAA tried to ban screeners of Oscar-nominated films over piracy fears in 2003, the risk of those screeners leaking to the Internet has actually fallen, according to research by journalist/programmer/dot-com founder Andy Baio. But a month before the ceremony, all but six of this year's 34 nominated films have been leaked online. Below, how movie studios' fear of piracy (okay, "stealing") was the best thing that happened to pirates. Plus, how a studio's fear of piracy kills a movie's Oscar chances.

Ripped copies of commercial DVDs have replaced screener copies, thanks to early-release DVDs from other world regions. Those DVDs, which skip the special features and image processing that go into American releases, were originally made to sell copies earlier in countries like Russia, where pirated screeners get ripped to DVD and are sold on the street. But by beating the pirates to the punch in the East, distributors helped viewers in the West get high-quality pirated movies before the Academy even got their screeners.

But that's not all the irony! Fear of piracy can also kill a film's Oscar chances. Baio noted in last year's piracy roundup that late and broken screeners probably killed Munich's Oscar shot in 2005, and that Crash won Best Picture after sending screeners to all the voters it could, while Disney took such anti-piracy pains that over a fourth of Academy voters didn't even watch its screeners, and Narnia only won Best Makeup.

Since some studios seem willing to kill their chances at an Oscar just to keep leaks off the Internet, I want to know: How many of you actually pirate movies online?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=352642&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Does EMI no longer believe in suing its customers?]]> EMIReuters is reporting that EMI, one of the world's four big music-label groups, wants to cut its funding to industry lobby groups, including the RIAA and the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry. EMI's "looking at ways to 'substantially' reduce the amount it pays trade groups," as a source puts it to the wire service. This is exactly the kick in the seat of its pants that the music industry needs.

The recording industry is suffering from a bit of an image problem lately. Beyond digital ineptitude, as illustrated by Universal CEO Doug Morris and Warner CEO Edgar Bronfman, the RIAA is wasting money on lawsuits while attempting to hack publicly funded universities. Bad press isn't the best way to win consumer goodwill, and by cutting ties with the rest of the industry, EMI could send the message that it cares more about selling music than suing its customers.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=328092&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[MPAA learns to pay illegal spies more]]> PirateThe Motion Picture Association of America claims it lost $2.3 billion worldwide to Internet piracy in 2005. So you'd think they'd be willing to spend a couple extra grand to keep some of its more unsavory antipiracy methods quiet. But you'd be wrong. According to a Wired News story, the MPAA signed a $15,000 contract with hacker Mark Anderson to obtain the names, addresses and phone numbers of the owners of P2P site Torrentspy.com.

This, Anderson said, after the MPAA told him, "We would need somebody like you. We would give you a nice paying job, a house, a car, anything you needed.... if you save Hollywood for us you can become rich and powerful."

After signing the contract, Anderson held up his side of the bargain, guessing at user passwords until he gained access to TorrentSpy's email servers and then forwarding information to the MPAA.

But after Anderson cashed his $15,000 for services rendered, he said he never heard from the MPAA again. Whoops.

Eventually, the attention-starved deviant went to Torrentspy's founder, Justin Bunnell, and confessed. Now Bunnell is suing the MPAA for illegal wiretapping. Anderson, however, faces no legal trouble.

"He took steps to advise us of his wrongdoing and to cooperate. We've made a decision to go after the bigger wrongdoing, the MPAA," Bunnell's attorney, Ira Rothken, told Wired.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=313447&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Google missing from Microsoft's antipiracy announcement]]> Microsoft and several large media companies — Disney, CBS, NBC Universal, Fox and MySpace, Viacom and Dailymotion — will announce plans this morning to use technology "to eliminate copyright-infringing content uploaded by users to Web sites, and block any infringing material before it is publicly accessible," according to a Wall Street Journal report. The Journal says Google, which separately announced its own automated piracy detector yesterday, isn't part of the group.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=312315&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[A Justin.tv "lifecaster," who sports a head-mounted...]]> A Justin.tv "lifecaster," who sports a head-mounted camera wherever he goes, is a huge jerk to a very polite movie-theater manager who asks him to remove his camera when he enters the theatre. Then he gets worked up and defensive when people call him out for his rude behavior. Ah yes, this must be what Al Gore envisioned when he invented the Internet. [TechCrunch]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=311598&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The RIAA wins a round]]> RecordJammie Thomas, the woman who file-sharers and legitimate music purchasers alike hoped would end the tirades of the Recording Industry Association of America was found guilty of copyright infringement and slapped with a $222,000 fine. Capitol Records v. Jammie Thomas, the first file-sharing case to actually go to trial, was a rallying point for anyone wishing to listen to music without automatically being deemed a criminal. The case revealed that the industry's lawsuits were, for the most part, a big, costly, unsubstantiated waste of time. But, alas for Thomas, not in this case. The victory will no doubt help the RIAA scare more people it accuses of file sharing into settling out of court. (Photo by Martin Belam)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307345&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[File-sharing lawsuits are mere shock and awe]]> recordThe record industry, according to a Sony executive testifying in the court case of Capitol Records v. Jammie Thomas, is losing millions taking alleged file sharers to court for crimes whose damage it can't assess. So, let's review: The record industry can't identify who's sharing files, can't account for how much an incident of piracy costs them, and can't explain to its customers why it's suing them. Is this any way to run a business — by bluffing?(Photo by P.B. Rage)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=306686&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[If you keep stealing movies, you'll never be a star]]> The Motion Picture Association of America has, for years, attempted to stop rampant piracy through cheesy, guilt-inducing public service announcements. "You're not just stealing from the rich, you're stealing from the janitors too" — that sort of thing. Well, the Brits have decided its film industry can only tackle its $18 billion piracy problem by targeting the young. Film Education, as the project is called, infiltrates classrooms to convince kids that piracy is evil by preying on their future hopes and dreams. The message: All those small, independent films that might launch your career in show biz won't get made because of your thieving ways.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=305837&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Pirate Bay takes on corporate raiders]]> Amidst all the hubbub about MediaDefender — the file-sharing policing agency whose private email files were recently spewed across the Internet, revealing unsavory antipiracy plans — one particularly interesting tidbit has bubbled to the surface. The Pirate Bay, a major file-sharing site, says it now has proof from those files that the music and movie industries have been paying hackers to attack the site. It is now taking this information to the police and charging the Swedish arms of Fox, EMI Music, Universal, Paramount, Atari, Activision, Ubisoft and Sony with technical sabotage, denial-of-service attacks, hacking, and spamming.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=302572&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Too lazy to do research, Canada looks up piracy stats on Wikipedia]]> Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceApparently digital-music piracy isn't as prevalent as we thought. Canada's Royal Mounted Police simply made up the fact that the country loses $30 billion to software piracy. We thought only gossip blogs did that kind of thing. The figure, a jumble of Internet research and corporate propaganda from the International Anti-Counterfeiting Coalition (members include the Recording Industry Association of America, the Motion Picture Association of America, and the Software & Information Industry Association), has helped shore up Canada's anti-piracy laws. Let this be a lesson to you kids: Don't always believe what you read on the Internet. Even if the Mounties wrote it.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=302440&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA["That's Jeff Gaspin, the president of the...]]> "That's Jeff Gaspin, the president of the NBC Universal Television Group. So his number-one priority is piracy. Not making high-quality shows. Not forging a sponsorship or advertising model that is less annoying and distracting to viewers, such that they (the viewers) would be less likely to want to fast-forward the advertising messages. No, piracy, that's his top priority." — Blogger John Gruber, reacting to Gaspin's statement that "priacy was and is our no. 1 priority." [Daring Fireball]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=302100&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Trent Reznor advises fans to fight the good fight, pirate]]>

Trent Reznor, frontman for Nine Inch Nails, is on the warpath against his record label, Universal Music Group. In Sydney, Reznor kicked off the NIN concert with an appeal to the crowd to steal his music until the labels realize they're ripping people off. This follows his attack on the recording industry while playing the Beijing Pop Festival earlier this month. He asked Chinese fans who couldn't obtain legal copies of his album to download it off the Web. Reznor views labels as greedy entities — charging progressively more for records without passing any additional revenue to artists. Once the band's contract with Universal is finished, Reznor plans to sell music directly to his fans for about $4 an album.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301631&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The porn industry is hard up for solutions to the piracy problem]]> Ars Technica]]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=298639&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Almost 100 percent of digital music downloads...]]> Almost 100 percent of digital music downloads in China are illegally acquired, reports BusinessWeek. Search engines Baidu and Yahoo China both offer MP3-specific searches alongside traditional image and video queries. [BusinessWeek]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=295302&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[AllofMP3 rises from the grave to haunt record labels]]> Rise from your grave.You've got to applaud those wily Russians behind music download site AllofMP3. They're clearly not afraid to spit in the faces of American copyright lawyers. Shut down by the Russian government so the country could enter the World Trade Organization, AllofMP3 has reportedly continued under the new name MP3sparks.com. But now that the site's owner Denis Kvasov was ruled not guilty of copyright infringement in Russian courts, AllofMP3 is getting ballsy. The site has reopened, and although no downloads are yet available, it's promising to be back in operation soon.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=293884&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Comcast cracks down on actual use of its broadband]]> Update below. Cable-TV and Internet provider Comcast is fighting back against customers who are rampant file sharers, TorrentFreak says. Reportedly the broadband Internet service provider has slowly ramped up monitoring of peer-to-peer network traffic, and now, using traffic-management services, it's preventing BitTorrent users from connecting to anyone outside the Comcast network. This would almost be commendable if its motivation was to crack down on piracy, but TorrentFreak suggests that Comcast is just being cheap. One anonymous Internet engineer says that just because you pay for a connection, doesn't mean you actually get to abuse it. Or, some might say, actually get to use it. What's next? Policing online-video sites, or bandwidth-intensive real-time videogames? You get what you pay for — except when you don't.

Update: Comcast says it does not throttle BitTorrent traffic. A representative told Silicon Alley Insider that Comcast does use various technologies to manage its network, but the company does not throttle or block BitTorrent or any application.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=291423&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Recording Industry Association of America...]]> The Recording Industry Association of America just sent out a batch of letters to universities offering to let their students admit to music piracy and settle claims before record labels start suing them. But the RIAA's not the only one capable of mass legal action. A former defendant in a music-copyright lawsuit is hoping to turn her case into a class action lawsuit for all wrongly sued or threatened by the RIAA, claiming that it "conducts illegal, flawed and negligent investigations." [Ars Technica]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=290822&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Can a Yahoo rescue Veoh from its pirate founder?]]> Steve MitgangVeoh, the overhyped, piracy-riddled online-video site, has hired Steve Mitgang, a former SVP at Yahoo. Mitgang, one of the myriad of Yahoos who's taking credit for its Project Panama online-ad system, may be a suit well-suited to make Veoh friendlier to advertisers. Not an easy task.

First step: Figuring out how to shut down increasingly crafty uploaders, who are putting copyrighted shows on Veoh and labeling them with nonsensical names to escape the reach of movie and music companies' takedown notices. And to do so, he'll have to batttle former CEO and founder Dmitry Shapiro, who's becoming Veoh's "chief innovation officer." As such, he'll no doubt continue to mouth platitudes about respecting copyright — and then come up with "innovations" like VeohTV, a piece of software which makes it easy to grab video from anywhere on the Web and store it on a user's hard drive, where, again, it's hard for media lawyers to find it.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=282821&view=rss&microfeed=true