<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, porn]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, porn]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/porn http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/porn <![CDATA[iPhone Porn Makes Long-Awaited App Debut]]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.It's been a full year since Time magazine dubbed porn "The iPhone's Next Frontier," and only now has an application publisher dared to distribute a truly adult application: An app called Hottest Girls was updated to include naked pictures.

The upgrade looks like a brazen publicity stunt; Apple told Time last year it would ban adult content from official applications. Assuming that position hasn't changed, Hottest Girls could soon be pulled from the app store and even, if Apple elects to do so, yanked from iPhones where it is now installed.

If it permitted to stay —Apple is now allowing NC-17 games, after all — expect a flurry of "innovation." While porn has long been available through the iPhone's Safari browser, publishers haven't even begun to explore the possibilities of being able to use the device's touch screen interface. Apple has the opportunity to change the world again; it just needs to seize it.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5302477&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Comcast Porn Goof Gives Super Bowl Viewers an Eyeful]]> Everyone's pretending to be shocked about the 10-second clip of porn spliced into Comcast's Tucson-area broadcast of the Super Bowl. Why? That's how Comcast butters its bread.

The clip (do we even need to mention that it's NSFW?) from ClubJenna, apparently meant to broadcast on the Shorteez channel but instead spliced into KVOA's feed of the football game, is but one of the many porn channels from which Comcast makes a healthy profit. Across the industry, porn accounts for more than a quarter of pay-per-view revenues. Cue a round of handwringing among the media. Comcast customers have better purposes for their hands.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5144428&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Playboy's Seductive, Convoluted Cell Phone Thing]]> What would you do for some free cell phone porn? Stand on one foot? Lick the pavement? Ha, Playboy is willing to work with you on this! Now, what would you do if it wasn't exactly porn, but a reality show webisode thing? You'd participate in a convoluted cell phone-based marketing scheme, wouldn't you. There's babes involved!

"In the latest issue of the legendary magazine, readers are invited to take a phone cam image of a logo for the new made-for-mobile video series Interns and send it to Playboy to receive a link to the weekly show. Interns tracks the learning curve of three young minimum wage earners in the Playboy New York marketing office, overseen by a dashing boss. The 4-minute episodes encapsulate the typical reality TV challenges, such as soliciting Cyber Babes."

I don't even understand what this is about, except that Playboy is still smart enough to only give away fully clothed intern photos for free. [MinOnline; pic via]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5107414&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Kiddie-porn scandal lands Wikipedia a British ban]]> Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia any unemployed Internet commenter can edit, has been banned by British Internet service providers over a display of child porn.

Free-speech zealots among Wikipedia's volunteer editors have insisted that the original cover of Virgin Killer, a 1976 album by German heavy metal band the Scorpions — shown here with a teddy-bear bowdlerization — must run alongside the site's page for the album. Their stubbornness has landed the Wikipedia page on a list of porn sites maintained by Internet Watch, a British group, whose censorship recommendations many British ISPs follow.

The ban seems like overkill, since it covers the album page, not just the image in question. But the fact that Wikipedia has let matters get this far speaks to the site's screwed-up culture. Erik Möller, the deputy director of the Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia's nonprofit parent, has defended child pornography in the past. His extremist stance is mirrored by an outspoken minority within Wikipedia's ranks of editors.

The Wikipedian child-porn fetish is disturbing. But it's a sign of a much deeper problem. Wikipedia editors love to make up bureaucratic rules. It's part of what makes the site so intimidating to new users, and why bias and misreporting so often go uncorrected on the site. Knowledgeable people are scared away by the need to engage in time-wasting arguments with bored teenagers and obsessive Internet users for whom enforcing these rules is a source of cheap entertainment. Why Internet providers are banning Wikipedia pages instead of Wikipedia editors is beyond me.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5103829&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Finally, a Porn Webcams Site Just for the iPhone]]> Sometimes, you just want to see an ugly girl in Bulgaria taking her clothes off for you in real time, but you aren't near a computer. Oh, cruel fate! If only there was a way to see a tiny, low-quality video of said ugly girl stripping on your iPhone! Well, good news (I guess): now there is. Yes, it's the first iPhone-only porn cam site.

Xgoes.mobi is definitely iPhone-only – it won't work on your computer's browser if you try it. What do you get when you go there and plunk down a membership fee? Access to a slew of cam feeds of both the single and couple variety, although mostly just single, sad girls on ugly bedspreads. The quality ain't great, and this is on WiFi. And if it's not worth it on WiFi, it's definitely not worth it on 3G. But hey, this is the only game in town for mobile cam feeds, so if you're the type of person who really gets your rocks off talking to a stripper on the internet in the back of a cab, your ship has come in. [Xgoes.mobi (iPhone only, NSFW) via Fleshbot (NSFW)]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5075088&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[La petite mort for man, a giant hump for mankind]]> Playboy capitalist Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic will take your $200,000 to book a brief trip to space. But when offered $1 million cash upfront to let an unnamed pornographer film some zero-gravity, superatmospheric nookie with the futurist-fetish SpaceShipTwo cabin as a backdrop, the space-tourism startup declined. Which leaves us here at Valleywag nothing to look forward to on the smut market once Hustler Video debuts the company's hardcore ode to Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin (Warning: Boobies and such). [Slashdot] (Photo by Getty/Daniel Berehulak)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5058372&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['Citizen Journalism' = Porn]]> Dadgummit, porn ruins corporate strategy! CBS is learning the hard way that if you give people a "branded mobile platform" to "upload" their "user-generated content," the "content" they will "generate" is "nekkid womens." The Tiffany Network started a site called CBSeyemobile.com where you, the idiotic consumer, can upload photos. And now they're shocked, shocked to find out that it's full of filth, loose women, and inappropriate public demonstrations of lesbianism! Ad Age broke the story in a Pulitzer-worthy feat of journalism, causing them to (modestly) publish this rather NSFW picture, which we are prepared to say is the most newsworthy photo that has ever graced that august publication's pages:




But you can't say it didn't generate any user dialogue:




Citizen journalism, ladies and gentlemen. [Ad Age]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5057587&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Porn palace in San Francisco houses just another startup]]> San Francisco's Kink.com operates just like any other startup — young folks everywhere, DJ booth in the break room, plucky office vibe — except there's way more ass-fucking. That's the story from inside The Armory, the imposing 200,000-sq. ft. "castle" at Mission and 14th Streets. The Armory's dungeonlike interior is the base of operations for CEO Peter Acworth's fetish-porn production company. What began as a shy British boy's experiments — building "fucking machines" and getting girls from Craigslist to ride them — has bloomed into a business that allowed him to buy his own playland for $14.5 million. Kink.com is the cover story for this week's San Francisco Bay Guardian. If you're not up to speed on the whole fucking-machine scene, here's a one-minute SFW text primer:

  • "On first glance inside, the place is almost disappointingly tame." Watching porn performers and support staff breeze around prepping for a shoot, in flip-flops and ponytails, is probably the only breakout fetish genre yet to have a site devoted to it. Kink actually did produce a behind-the-scenes show, BehindKink.com. The name was prone to misunderstanding.
  • "The models aren't actors." Don't kid yourself — anyone paid-to-play for a camera is performing, even if the end product is billed as "reality." Even if the actors involved have that same kind of sex off the clock. Despite the Bay Area's fetish for overdocumentation, very few people have an actual fetish for the camera itself. You want to watch a performance, even if you also want to believe the folks on screen "really are having a good time." Call it Porno's Paradox.
  • "Kinky.com: Following the Web 2.0 trend of user-based content, Kinky.com will allow members and models to maintain user profiles, interact with one another on message boards, blog, and even date." It sounds like the obligatory social network that even less-ambitious porn companies feel oblige to hitch to their content wagons. At best, it'll give members a way to connect in person and live out the scenes they could previously only see on pay-per-view. Why sit home and poke when you can yes yes we know, we're done with that joke, too. Plus like we'd imply you shouldn't get laid for free.
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5054348&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Porn consultant teaches you to use Twitter so we don't have to]]> It says a certain sad something that there's a whole consulting market in explaining how to use Twitter. They see the microblogging tool as just another outlet for "deep brand penetration." None more penetrating than adult-entertainment consultant Callie Simms, who's able cut to the quick of how Twitter is being used to inform and annoy. It should be mandatory for all future "new media" webinars to include her advice: "Talk about things in your industry. No, I don’t care what dildo was up Tera’s ass, talk about trends."

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5051330&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Baby's first gay porn, courtesy of Google]]> A tipster tells us his boss searched Google Products for a "'Spit Happens' t-shirt" for his infant. Google found him a suitably innocent bodysuit on CafePress.com. It also found him a pair of gay porn videos, one called Nasty Nasty featuring "a stunning young man, the spitting image of a young Ben Affleck," and another called Bedrock, featuring actors who "take turns pounding each other on a bunch of iron beds," — ouch. We're not sure who to blame for the confusion here.

Google is the one whose X-rated product directory turned up even when the searcher turned on "moderate filtering." On the other hand, say "spit happens" to most any man in the 18-to-34 year old demographic, and you'll either get a jovial fist bump or a politely restrained grimace. The phrase hardly connotes innocence. And the algorithm tries to give the people what they want. Maybe Google knows something you don't?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5050460&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Porn and ads account for two in five videos watched online]]> That's what the addition by subtraction equals when you compare comScore's 10.8 billion unique video streams counted in June to Nielsen's 7.5 billion — because of the two Web usage statistic compilers, Nielsen refuses to count "pornography" and "advertising" in the company's total. At first I though, "There's a difference between porn and ads?" And then I remembered: I generally like porn and I usually hate ads. No wonder it's so hard to chose between loving and hating American Apparel. [Silicon Alley Insider]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5046534&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[X-Files star in rehab for Internet porn addiction]]> A little tear, please, for David Duchovny's broadband account. He's willingly severed his high-speed hookup so he can head to treatment for an addiction to Internet porn. Duchovny copped to rumors that he was a "sex addict" when he checked himself in last week.

We're not ones to throw a word like "addiction" around lightly at Camp Valleywag, and we'd never rob a nerd icon like Duchovny of some dignity on his way to dry out. But come on, you're wondering too: What kind of Internet porn is Duchovny into? Log your suspect sites in the comments. (Photo by Andy Johnstone/Pacificcoastnews.com)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5044900&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Microsoft realizes the Internet is for porn]]> Mozilla ended up dropping the feature from Firefox 3, but rumor has it Microsoft is considering adding a private browsing mode to its Internet Explorer 8 update. Private browsing — also known as "porn mode" — makes dumping a browser's history, clearing its cache and blocking cookies that much easier. Apple's Safari browser has had it as an option since 2005, when Paul Boutin recommended readers use it for "birthday shopping."

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5039374&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Internet safe from California porn tax]]> Online porn has been spared an XXXL tax, proposed last spring by Assemblyman Charles Calderon (D.-some town where no one buys porn). When even state Republicans wouldn't back the 25 percent tax on adult entertainment, including streaming and downloaded Internet content, Calderon's argument that those who produce and consume porn need to pay for its "harms" on the community started to fell apart. This week, the bill got tied up in the Appropriations Committee, from whence it's believed to be unlikely to emerge before the close of the legislative session on November 30. The term is "held under submission," and it has nothing to do with anything going on inside Kink.com's headquarters in the Mission District.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5036065&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Vudu sexes up its set-top box, but is it too late?]]> Vudu, a startup which sells a set-top box for downloading HD movies over the Internet, has finally added adult content to the mix through a partnership with AVN. Neither Netflix nor Apple will let you watch folks bump uglies — in stunning 1080p resolution, no less. Vudu rival FyreTV won't let you download anything but porn, so it's certainly a differentiator. But is it enough to save Vudu's business model? Unlikely. At $299 (marked down from $399), the box is pricey, the selection of videos still limited, and the premise that viewers will spend up to $20 to virtually "own" Ashlynn Goes to College 3 questionable. And of course, the real competition isn't other paid services — it's the millions of hours of free porn available on the Internet.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5033948&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Even porn execs have bitter domain-name battles]]> The Fed love a good porn investigation. Allegedly, John Gray, CEO of the strip-club-industrial complex Spearmint Rhino, has been illegally taking control of domains owned by his former business partner, Michael Ninn, best known for the kind of arty, high-gloss hardcore films that almost take themselves too seriously to be porn. The FBI is rumored to be investigating. On the one hand, it's good that the naked-lady biz has its corporate-level disputes treated fairlly by the cops. On the less-lubed hand? The tipster alerting us to this case offers a better remedy: Perhaps Mr. Gray could focus on his actual naked-lady biz and drop the overpriced drinks and cover charges. (Photo via AVN)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028975&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Child Online Protection Act gets sent to time-out a third time]]> Defeated a third time this week: the Child Online Protection Act, a 10-year-old law deemed unenforceable twice by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, and once by the Supreme Court. The American Civil Liberties Union argued that though the law is written supposedly to prohibit minor's access to "harmful" materials online, it could land your average sex blogger selling CafePress g-strings up to six months imprisonment for not blocking underage Web users from their site. Though the guidelines for what's considered "harmful" have been deemed overbroad, it's anticipated that the Bush Administration will seek another appeal. Better hurry if he wants to block Obamaporn before he rolls out of office. (Photo by Silveira Neto)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028851&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[MeeVee's cocked-up new strategy for growing a late-night audience]]> A tipster has shared a hard-on-laden screenshot of the MeeVee homepage around midnight Tuesday. From their launch in 2000 as a "TV Guide killer" to their recent shift into online video listings, MeeVee has never managed to find an online-video niche — but this slip-up suggests one. The site has been up for sale since April. Clearly, these guys are not partying with YouTube's porn team nearly enough. Or maybe MeeVee is the one place where the YouTube team can go to blow off a little steam. Here's what slipped past MeeVee's filters:

MeeVee After Midnight

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028309&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Politician threatens to sue Comcast for not fighting child porn the right way]]> Broadband provider Comcast is pushing back against New York state attorney general Andrew Cuomo's demands to support his anti-child-porn campaign. Comcast and 16 other ISPs signed an agreement with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, which maintains a blacklist of suspected illegal porn sites — but for Cuomo's office, that isn't good enough. They insist that in addition to blocking websites, Comcast must fall in line with Time Warner Cable, Verizon, Sprint, AOL and AT&T in shutting customers out of all or part of Usenet, the network of Internet-based discussion groups, and contributing funds to root out more child porn providers. It's not the most practical or even Constitutional approach, but a good move for headlines. Comcast has until Friday to respond to Cuomo's request to sign his code and kick in the cash. (Photo via Bloomberg)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028292&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[SlickCash.com pays $500,000 to settle charges of hacking Facebook]]> Adult site promo businesses boast of "high payouts" to webmasters who bring customers to their partner sites, but nothing like the $500,000 Slickcash.com had to hand over to Facebook. SlickCash settled the "hacking" suit, in which they were alleged to have hit up Facebook's servers at least 200,000 times, presumably to advertise LesbianTraining.com and other sites in their stable through the Friend Finder feature.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028205&view=rss&microfeed=true