<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, reggie davis]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, reggie davis]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/reggiedavis http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/reggiedavis <![CDATA[Yahoo Flack Quit After Lawsuit Leak]]> One of the messes Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz must clean up is a three-year-old investigation into claims of discrimination by a black female lawyer. After a leak of confidential documents, it's now even messier.

The Recorder, a San Francisco legal publication, has details of the case, which is now being considered by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: Eulonda Skyles (left), the first black woman hired in Yahoo's 200-person legal department, says she was mommy-tracked after a maternity leave in 2005, and treated worse than white women who had also taken time off for pregnancy and childcare.

Yahoo general counsel Michael Callahan told the Recorder that Skyles's charges were meritless. And yet Yahoo pushed Skyles's supervisor, Reggie Davis, out of the legal department altogether and into a dead-end job hundreds of miles away from headquarters. Callahan claimed that Davis's new job was "a great career opportunity." Another lawyer, Lynn Loeb, left the company after Skyles pointed out that she was overseeing work by an outside law firm where her husband works, a possible ethics violation. Again, Yahoo said that was unrelated.

And now we hear another top Yahoo executive may have lost her job over the Skyles case.

The Recorder article, written by Zusha Elinson, has a detailed, negative account of Skyles' on-the-job performance which comes from a document generated during confidential settlement talks between Skyles and Yahoo in 2006. (Skyles disputes Yahoo's negative claims about her, as do former colleagues who worked with her at Yahoo.)

How did Elinson get his hands on the confidential document? We're told that Callahan, the Yahoo general counsel, provided it to Jill Nash (left), Yahoo's top flack, and from there, it made its way into the reporter's hands. According to an email Skyles sent to Bartz, that leak was a violation of both the confidentiality of the settlement and labor laws restricting what an employer may say publicly about an employee's performance.

Skyles sent the email the morning of February 2 — more than two weeks before Elinson's story would be published — demanding that Bartz take action against the person who leaked the document.

That afternoon, Nash announced her departure from Yahoo. A flack always chooses words carefully; in her goodbye email, Nash did not say she had "quit" or "resigned" — only that she was leaving. She had no new job lined up, nor did she disclose any future plans.

Coincidence? Perhaps. Nash had worked under three different CEOs in the space of two years, and dealt with a hostile takeover attempt by Microsoft and a bruising proxy fight with corporate raider Carl Icahn. But, significantly, Bartz has launched a fearsome campaign against leaks inside Yahoo, going as far as to offer a $1,000 reward to any employee who snitches on a leaker. If Nash really left Yahoo because of the Recorder, we think Bartz needs to write Skyles a check.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5155197&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA["That's Mr. Suck Up to you"]]> Reggie Davis, the attorney booted from Yahoo's legal team and granted a face-saving job monitoring fraudulent clicks on Yahoo's ad network, was not laid off, as a tipster told us. Here's how he told his staff he's still on the job:

From: Reggie Davis [mailto:reggie@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:46 AM
To: reggie-all-US-Burbank@staff.yahoo-inc.com
Cc: Tim Cadogan; Lynne Secrest; David Pann; Robert Dillon; Cheryl Kellond; Bill Schmarzo; Marilyn Poucher Subject: hey folks - I am still here....
Despite the reports in valleywag to the contrary, I am still here at Yahoo! Thanks for those of you who thought this was real and were concerned for me and my family - clearly the silver lining in this silly sideshow. That said, I will now expect everyone to refer to me as "Mr. Suck Up" and not just suck up.... Thanks, Reggie
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=356864&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Yahoo keeps ineffective "click fraud czar" in place, showing how little it cares]]> Pink_Slips.jpgIn March 2007, Yahoo named Reggie Davis its vice president of marketplace quality. The headlines hailed him as Yahoo's new "click fraud czar." Tom Cuthbert, president of Click Forensics, a search-marketing researcher, told CNET the move signaled "Yahoo is taking a more honest approach" to fighting click fraud." So what does it say about Yahoo's "honest approach" now that a tipster tells us Davis got the pink slip?

That Cuthbert got the reasons for Davis's hire hilariously wrong, and that his rumored pink slip indicates Yahoo is, at last, treating the problem seriously. Booted from Yahoo's legal team, Davis only got the "meaningless job as VP for click fraud," our tipster tells us, as "a bogus saving-face job thanks to sucking up to Sue [Decker]." Update: Davis now says he's still in place at Yahoo, so the sucking up must have been truly effective.

Google, Yahoo and everyone else in the search industry will tell you they're fighting click fraud as much as they can. And they are. Mostly by giving advertisers a discount that far exceeds the number of possibly questionable clicks, for show.

The truth is, as Google CEO Eric Schmidt said in a moment of unguarded honesty a couple summers ago, if illegitimate clicks really do find their way into cost-per-click markets, advertisers will account for it in how much they value each click, and pay less for them. Making jobs like the one Reggie Davis held until yesterday still holds as redundant as everyone but Yahoo figured out long ago.

(Photo by My Hobo Soul)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=356450&view=rss&microfeed=true