<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, samsung]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, samsung]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/samsung http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/samsung <![CDATA[Samsung pulls out of SanDisk deal]]> We already took our shot at what was behind Samsung's so-crazy-it-makes-sense attempt to acquire SanDisk. Samsung, we said, has supplied the memory chips for Apple's iPhone since its launch last year. That's why Samsung needs to bulk up to contend with the might of Apple, one of the largest buyers of flash memory. Now that Samsung has dropped its $5.8 billion bid, does that mean we were wrong? Well, yes. Big corporations act like teenagers. These crazy kids will eventually make up, or find other partners. Here's the official breakup note from Samsung CEO Yoon Woo Lee:

After nearly six months of efforts to pursue a transaction with no meaningful progress, we are withdrawing our proposal to acquire SanDisk. I am disappointed that we have been unable to reach an agreement on our proposal. I continue to believe that a combination of our two companies would have created a superior global brand, an unparalleled technology platform and the scale and resources to drive convergence in the marketplace.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5067160&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Toshiba in $1 billion manufacturing deal with SanDisk]]> Japanese electronics conglomerate Toshiba has bought a portion of its flash-memory joint venture with SanDisk back from its partner, in a deal worth $1 billion. Some analysts think this makes SanDisk a more attractive buyout candidate for Samsung, which has twice offered $5.85 billion for the Silicon valley company. [WSJ]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5066077&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Why Apple's forcing Samsung to chase SanDisk]]> Samsung has launched a hostile $5.9 billion offer for SanDisk, a rival maker of flash-memory chips, which SanDisk has rejected. Toshiba, which manufactures chips in partnership with SanDisk, is considering a blocking bid. The posturing is typical: SanDisk says the bid undervalues the company, while Samsung executives retort that it is "full and fair." Leave aside the deal theatrics: Why does Samsung want SanDisk?

Simple: It needs to bulk up to contend with the might of Apple, one of the largest buyers of flash memory.
Samsung has supplied the memory chips for Apple's iPhone since its launch last year. Before then, Samsung sold Apple memory for its iPod line, and continues to do so today. Apple is a huge customer for Samsung — so huge that it can command deep discounts, and tie up an enormous amount of Samsung's manufacturing capability. When Apple first launched its flash-memory iPod Nano, it locked up enough production to keep rivals off the market for months. (Even Samsung and SanDisk tried to launch me-too clones of the Nano, to no effect.)

Regulators may block Samsung's SanDisk bid. But they ought to keep an eye on Apple, too. Antitrust cops tend to spend all their time watching for monopolies — sellers who wield undue influence over a market. They should crack open their investment glossaries and look up "monopsony" — the condition that exists when a buyer dominates a market.

(Illustration via Apple Insider)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5051366&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[SanDisk for sale to Samsung?]]> Milpitas-based flash-memory maker SanDisk may sell out to Korean megavendor Samsung, the world's biggest maker of memory chips. As prices for flash memory drop, SanDisk sale rumors have floated for weeks, including word of a possible acquisition by hard-drive maker Seagate. But Samsung could use SanDisk's portfolio of patents to beat back its rival Toshiba, which currently has a manufacturing partnership with SanDisk. Not to mention save some money: The Wall Street Journal reports Samsung pays SanDisk $400 million to $500 million a year in flash-memory royalties.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5046024&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[When the going gets tough, AOL makes its ads huger]]> AOL ad revenue grew at an old media-like pace in the second quarter, increasing just two percent. So what's Middle America's favorite Internet property to do? Get super-sized, of course. "Beginning today," a breathless flack writes us:

Platform-A is offering advertisers the opportunity to purchase a 300x600 ad unit for AOL homepages: AOL.com, the AOL client and co-branded sites. AOL is the only portal that offers advertisers this ad unit size, which is double the size of the largest ad unit – 150x300 – that advertisers typically purchase on the other portal sites.

Samsung ad buyers at Mediaveest already took the plunge, running a 600x300 ad on AOL.com today that when "expanded," goes beyond the margins of my browser window. Annoying? Yes, but — at least long as AOL's revenue growth stays so slow — AOL's belly-buster ads are here to stay. Studies show that larger ads can lead to 4 times as many conversions as smaller button ads.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5034675&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Mankind's destiny fulfilled: Wireless home HDTV in 2009]]>

Sony, Samsung, Motorola and Hitachi have banded together to adopt Amimon's ready-and-shipping wireless HDTV chips for next year's products. Because the products will have no cable jacks, the new gear will sport a conspicuous logo that indicates it will connect to other devices with the same logo. If you want to play pundit, predict a format war between Amimon's WHDI and SiBeam's WirelessHD, which other manufacturers are tinkering with. But if you want to know who will win, Amimon's technology is already shipping and SiBeam's isn't.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028129&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The real secret of Steve Jobs's success]]> Everyone likes to talk up Apple's innovative design. It's a much more attractive story than the real reason why Apple has come to dominate first the MP3 player market, and soon, the smartphone market: Ruthless haggling with suppliers to lock up crucial components, shutting out rivals. Apple is buying 50 million 8-gigabyte memory chips from Samsung — the kind used in its entry-level iPhone 3G — and Samsung is cutting off other customers as a result of tight supplies. [DigiTimes]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5022024&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Steve Jobs buys PA Semi for a chip — a bargaining chip]]> AppleSteve Jobs likes to say that Apple is the last company that makes "the whole widget." But it doesn't, not really. Sure, Apple makes software and designs hardware — but inside its gadgets are silicon brains from the likes of Samsung and Intel. Jobs is adept at bullying chipmakers for lower prices and faster delivery, but he can't order around their engineers like he does his own employees. That must rile him. Jobs's ego, therefore, is the best explanation for Apple's $278 million acquisition of PA Semi, a microprocessor design startup. But is Apple getting into the ruthlessly competitive semiconductor business?

Likely not. Expect to read lots of gadget-press slavering over PA Semi's speeds and feeds, and debate over its chips' suitability for an iPhone. That may well have nothing to do with why Apple bought the company.

PA Semi's prize is its founder, Dan Dobberpuhl, a famed chip designer, and his 150-person staff. At less than $2 million per engineer, the price Apple paid is in the range Cisco pays to snap up talented engineers. With them working at Apple, Jobs can push established chipmakers to adopt its technical innovations and perhaps swap licenses for intellectual property. That's far more likely than actually switching away from Intel chips for the Mac; Apple actually explored using PA Semi's chips before choosing Intel. Even the iPhone, which would benefit more from PA Semi's low-power chips, is an unlikely candidate for an all-new chip design.

Why? Volume economics favor Intel and Samsung so strongly that it's hard to imagine that a new microprocessor design from the PA Semi team could replace their wares. $278 million doesn't buy Jobs a rival chip; it buys him a tool to chip away at his suppliers' prices.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=382944&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Why it's splitsville for Motorola]]> The cellular graveyardMotorola, mortally wounded, is spinning off its handset business in slow motion. CEO Greg Brown expects the deal to go through next year. There's no Razr on the horizon to spur sales, thanks to former CEO Ed Zander's overreliance on the model. In San Francisco cofeeshops, the popular theory is that Apple's iPhone killed Motorola. Nonsense. Motorola killed Motorola. The population of the Bay Area is 7.2 million; despite the appearance that every man, woman, and child here now has an iPhone, Apple will be lucky to have sold that many by now.

Motorola sells 20 times that many phones in a year. No, the real problem is that Samsung has taken market share from it in the U.S., where Motorola dominates, and Nokia is killing it in the developing world. And that's entirely Motorola's fault. Fixated by the high-end smartphones popular in the U.S., Motorola didn't sell enough cheap phones elsewhere. While we debate the relative virtues of locked and unlocked iPhones, billions of people wait to make their first telephone call ever. You can only sell so many phones to The 250 — even if they keep breaking them.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372473&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Sony turns to Sharp for LCD supply]]> Do most flat-screen TVs strike you as numbingly similar? That's because under the hood, they are. LCD production is consolidating into an ever smaller number of suppliers. Sony and Samsung compete on store shelves, but they buy their LCDs from the same company — S-LCD, a joint venture. Now Sony is forming a new joint venture with Sharp, another fierce rival. Why? Moore's Law, the overlord of chips, is moving into the TV world. Making an LCD screen requires skill in handling silicon, and billion-dollar investments: Sharp's latest plant costs $3.5 billion, an expense Sony will now subsidize.

Expect more consolidation: Just as the PC-chip market has narrowed to two suppliers, Intel and AMD, the flat-screen market can likely sustain even fewer players than it has now. Will Sony be one of them? Unlikely. Caught flat-footed by the rise of LCD TVs, it was forced into its Samsung venture. Now, with Sharp, it will be a junior partner, owning one-third of the business.

The Trinitron made Sony a household name. But in the LCD business, it's just another purchaser of commodity parts, with a brand name tacked on. Sony will no doubt argue that in a future of networked televisions, software, not hardware, is what matters. But in that field, Sony has hardly distinguished itself.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=360711&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[A power failure at a Samsung factory in Seoul,...]]> AP]]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=285848&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Spoiling Apple's iPhone party]]> We hate to interrupt the Apple lovefest with a tiresome observation about currency markets. But for anyone still outside the reality distortion field, here's some required reading: A Wall Street Journal article about the rise in value of the South Korean won (reg. required). Here's why this is bad news for the iPhone.What's an iPhone? Mostly a metal and plastic package for a flash-memory chip and an LCD screen. And where do those come from? Largely from South Korea, home to Samsung, LG, and countless other parts-makers. Those poor souls get paid in dollars, which are worth less as the won gets more valuable. Apple, whose profits have been supercharged by rapidly falling component prices over the past year, will have a tough time negotiating lower prices. If the won appreciates further, forget hopes of an iPhone cheaper than its current $499 price tag.]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=267797&view=rss&microfeed=true