<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, silverlight]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, silverlight]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/silverlight http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/silverlight <![CDATA[Microsoft to sneak in a launch of Silverlight 2.0]]> Yes, all anyone can talk about are Apple's new laptops. Always prone to squandering a PR opportunity, Microsoft is set to debut the next version of its answer to Adobe's Flash — Silverlight, the video player everyone talks about but no one has installed. Silverlight 2.0 has digital rights management software to power multimedia sites, skinning capabilities for the player, deep zoom, as well as finally Mac and Linux support for Firefox and even Chrome a long list of features that don't matter. [PC Magazine]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5062869&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Microsoft now being sued for patent infringement over Silverlight]]> Silverlight, Microsoft's buggy effort to tackle Adobe's Flash video technology, has another hiccup on the road to mass acceptance. Gotuit, a video-technology startup, has filed suit against Microsoft for patent infringement. Gotuit will be represented by Spencer Hosie, a law firm which has tangled with Team Redmond before and managed to squeeze out a $60 million settlement for Burst.com. Don't even know what Silverlight is? Read the primer so you can bluff your way out of a gaggle of Google employees. [News.com]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5026356&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Silverlight bugs sign of growing user base, or bad code?]]> Wacky developer Brent SimmonsCat-loving software developer Brent Simmons parses a lot of error logs maintaining NetNewsWire, an application for reading RSS feeds, and it's a fine perch on which to spot trends online. Lately he's been seeing more and more browsers borked by Microsoft plugin Silverlight, the software giant's tragically late multimedia competitor to Adobe's Flash. This could be a good sign for Microsoft in terms of a growing user base, but personally I've yet to see an installation of Silverlight in the wild, even on regular trips to Microsoft Country. I'm guessing the problems are more likely due to bloated code, a monopolist's tendency to ignore industry standards, or both. Simmons, for what it's worth, wishes a pox upon both houses because users blame his product when the big-shots' bugs cause problems with his product. (Photo from Brent Simmons)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381960&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Microsoft's attempt to catch up with Adobe's...]]> Scott Guthrie's blog]]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=297551&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Adobe's latest Flash move could be the death of amateur Web video]]> adobe_logo.gifYippee! No more crappy, blurry YouTube videos! No more pixelated garbage filling every corner of the Web! Adobe's addition of the advanced H.264 high-definition codec — "codec" being a fancy way of saying "video algorithm" — to its popular Flash software. Flash, of course, has become the ubiquitous means of distributing video on the Web. Adding H.264 will finally bring high-quality moving images into the Web mainstream, and put an end to the rein of amateurism in online video. Or will it? Not so fast.

H.264 makes it possible for dramatic quality improvements in Internet video, it's true. However, most loser-generated content is still being produced with crappy cameras, on home computers with cheap editing software. The update to Flash will not create a tidal wave of better content. It only removes one of many roadblocks.

And, needless to say, a more advanced algorithm won't improve the subject matter of Web videos. YouTube will remain just as inane and crappy as before. The difference between professional and amateur content, however, will become more and more distinct. We'll still be inundated with videos of dressed-up pets and teenagers lip syncing two feet away from the camera (always original and entertaining). We'll just be more aware that we're watching crap.

For Adobe, it's a timely move. Content producers were beginning to eschew Flash video's universality for higher-quality download formats; startups like Joost were hoping to develop alternative video delivery mechanisms by emphasizing better image resolution; and Microsoft thought it saw an open door to compete with Flash through Silverlight, its competing multimedia platform which supports another HD-video format. Adobe just closed the door on competitors and cemented its control of online video for the foreseeable future. And if it renders people's home videos that much more tiresome, all the better.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=291850&view=rss&microfeed=true