<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, south park]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, south park]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/southpark http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/southpark <![CDATA[South Park power outage frees workers from Web 2.0]]> The power is out in South Park, San Francisco's startup epicenter. Wired and Yahoo Brickhouse — in the same building — are affected. Caffe Centro is down. Jack Falstaff isn't answering the phone. Six Apart, a block away on Fourth Street, is up. Workers are roaming the neighborhood. Got any more data points? Send 'em in to tips@valleywag.com.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5040116&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[So-called recession hits "Grapes of Wrath" levels, with Okies eyeing the Valley]]> Maybe the possibility of an impending recession hasn't hit home for you yet, comfortable as you are with your South-Park-cafe Wi-Fi connection. But as this clip documents, times are tough in such middle American towns as South Park, Colorado.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=380972&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Much Did Everyone In The South Park YouTube Episode Really Make?]]> A friend at YouTube told me that maybe a half-dozen people make their living as YouTube creators. Everyone else in the site's partner program gets maybe a couple thousand bucks for millions of views (like our guest writer Yuri Baranovsky). How can someone figure out their personal worth to YouTube? Good question. Tech and media blogs like paidContent keep guessing and making rough calculations, but it's all fake numbers based on spotty data. So how much did the YouTube stars in that South Park episode — the ones waiting in YouTube's office for their money until they all fight to the death — how much money did they really make?

The vast majority of YouTube partners haven't talked about what they're pulling in. Neither has the company. And there's really no incentive to; revealing the pay would only make users more agitated when they're not at the top of the list. So we're not sure how much Tay Zonday or Chris Crocker are making. But I can tell you this about the Internet stars that South Park killed off:

1. Tay Zonday, "Chocolate Rain": Unknown, but possibly a good amount. Probably made more from his Dr. Pepper commercial.
2. Tron Guy: Probably nothing; he was only part of other people's videos
3. Gary Brolsma, "Numa Numa": Maybe a little from his uncomfortably bad sequel that racked up nine million views, though this was before the partner program officially launched. But the original Numa Numa, which got eleven million views, was just someone else's copy; remember that Gary was the last huge video hit before YouTube, back when everyone had to download Windows Media and Quicktime files.
4. Star Wars Kid: Nothing. Settled a lawsuit against the kids who put his video online (again pre-YouTube though copies are up at the site), and some bloggers raised money for him out of sympathy.
5. Sneezing Panda: Nothing.
6. Dramatic Prairie Dog: Nothing. Apparently taken from CollegeHumor.com, where someone took a clip from a Japanese show and added the dramatic sound. One site claims it was an animated GIF long before it became a video.
7. Chris Crocker, "Leave Britney Alone": Probably nothing; he doesn't have ads on his channel so he must not be a partner. And I haven't heard anything new about the reality show he was supposed to star in.
8. Chinese Back Street Boys: Almost certainly nothing; the clips seem to have been uploaded by someone else, and no ads appear near them.
9. Laughing Baby: Nothing. No ads. A shame too, cause this video got over 45 million views.
10. Afroninja: Nothing. The clip wasn't his.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381004&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[South Park kills 10 YouTube memes for good]]> They killed Kenny's memeViacom continues to pursue a $1 billion lawsuit against Google's YouTube for allowing video piracy. On Viacom's Comedy Central, South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone aren't helping their corporate parent's legal case. In last night's episode, Stan, Kyle, Cartman, and Kenny asked themselves "How Do We Make Money on the Internet?" and predictably, they find it difficult — just like YouTube. This leads to a South Park scene straight out of Viacom CEO Philippe Daumann's dreams as, one by one, the viral-video sensations that made YouTube so big are destroyed. Here's the scene in two clips, and all the popular videos it refers to:


The viral videos, by order of appearance:

"Chocolate Rain" Original Song by Tay Zonday

Samwell - "What What (In the Butt)"

Tron Guy

Numa Numa

Star Wars Kid

Sneezing Panda

Dramatic Gopher

Chris Crocker - LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE!

Hahaha (laughing baby)

Afro Ninja

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=375653&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt...]]> South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone have opened up SouthParkStudios.com, an "Internet hub" — what's wrong with just calling it a "website"? — to promote the show online and combat rampant piracy of the cartoon show on YouTube. It will also host new projects prior to their TV launch. [PaidContent]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=293822&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Foosball showdown, Valleyschwag vs. Jumpcut]]> Foosball games in the dot-com-heavy South Park neighborhood don't mean there's a bubble — it'll be a bubble when a San Francisco startup has room for ping-pong tourneys. But it still felt like 1993 (for those of us who weren't still in grade school) at the offices of Jumpcut.com today. A team from the online-video-editing startup battled the guys from Valleyschwag (the schwag-magazine division of web-dev company Rubyred Labs, which lives across the street). It was a foosball tournament for the ages — or at least for the weekend.

Beer flowed, balls were smacked, we learned something about Google co-founder Larry Page. Check out the video, a slightly trimmed version of the official Jumpcut cut by Jumpcut employees Ashot and Steve.

High point: Noticing that Jumpcut's foosball men are all named (and labeled) after soccer stars and businessmen. Low point: Summer heat making these geeks sweat and smell more like b-ballers than foosballers.

Valleyschwag vs. Jumpcut Foos Tourney [Jumpcut video]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=181478&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[OLD BUT BREAKING NEWS: Tumbleweeds in South Park explained]]> SF Chronicle writer Dan Fost has rolling updates on the "Tumbleweeds in South Park" tale referenced in his South Park feature story.

The original story: A former dot-commer released tumbleweeds upon South Park during the Bust. But who? Why? With what PR firm egging them on?

After Valleywag bugged Dan for background, he dug up the weed-tumbler, Lisa Meckler. The former Wired Magazine employee gathered some tumbleweeds in 2002, issued a press release, and scattered them across the South Park lawn. Above, a photo of the event coaxes poetry out of Dan.

Two sidenotes after the jump.

Tumbleweeds: The Back Story [Tech Chronicles]
Home of dot-com revolution to be given final valediction [Send2Press.com]
Earlier: Tumbling tumbleweeds [Valleywag]

Note that according to Meckler, the tumbleweeds "just sat there." Fost originally wrote that they "roll[ed] across the lawn." Career-breaking fact-check scandal?

Also: In her press release, Meckler described a "fog-like unease" blanketing San Francisco. I think it's called "fog."

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=168558&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Lazy News: "Web 2.0 has a local address"]]> Welcome to Lazy News, the new Valleywag feature that saves you the time of actually reading news articles. The first article we'll slice-and-dice is the San Francisco Chronicle's business feature from Sunday.

  • Title: Web 2.0 has a local address
  • Subtitle: South Park, the neighborhood that fostered the dot-com boom, is back
  • Trend angle: San Fran is back too — the whole Valley is back. And this time the businesses are real.
  • Poster children: Adaptive Path, Rubyred Labs, Wired, Technorati, VideoEgg, Mule Design Studio, and other tech companies from Bryant to Brannan, Second Street to Third Street
  • Photos: Aerial shot infographic, kids in the park, street signs, and Rubyred's Thor Muller at the Cereal Bar.
  • Lead: South Park startup Rubyred Labs has a trendy Cereal Bar.
  • Sources: Scott Beale (Laughing Squid founder, photographed the Cereal Bar); Janice Fraser (CEO of South Park stalwart Adaptive Path); Matt Sanchez (CEO of startup VideoEgg); Jesse Blout (mayor's director of economic development); Jeffrey O'Brien (a senior editor of long-time South Parker Wired Magazine); Neighborhoodparks.org; Max Applegarth (owner of local cafe Caffe Centro); Jonathan Nelson (founder of online marketing agency Organic); Jonathan Wright (from burnout dot-com BigWords.com); Maggie Mason (mighty blogger and writer); Elvis Jessie Presley (homeless man); Jonathan Grubb (Rubyred co-founder and cereal analyst); Amy and Thor Muller (Rubyred co-founders and Noe Valley baby-raisers)
  • Best line: "I saw 20-year-olds in head-to-toe Prada and said, 'This cannot last'" — Maggie Mason
  • WTF: The tumbleweed story

Web 2.0 has a local address [SF Chronicle]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=167716&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Tumbling tumbleweeds]]> Tumbleweed - ValleywagDan Fost's SF Chronicle story reveals: Even the dot-com bust couldn't drive dumb stunts out of SF's startup-filled South Park neighborhood.

In February 2002, with things at rock bottom, a former dot-commer brought a truck full of tumbleweeds to South Park and let them roll across the lawn.

Dan, if you're reading this — can we get a little backstory? Were they filming the opening credits for "The Big Lebowski 2: San Francisco"?

Dan gets reactions from South Park workers, but they only deepen the mystery:

"It was a punch in the gut," Margaret Mason said. "It was a representation of everything everyone had been feeling."

"It was a perfect metaphor," said [Max] Applegarth.

"It was dumb," said people in general.

Web 2.0 has a local address [SF Chronicle]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=167603&view=rss&microfeed=true