<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, steven levy]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, steven levy]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/stevenlevy http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/stevenlevy <![CDATA[Is Web 2.0 Safe in a War Zone?]]> The gang of webheads sent by the State Department to Iraq is doing what webheads do: blogging, Twittering, and posting photos in real time. This must be giving their government minders fits.

Jack Dorsey, the nominal (read: unemployed) chairman of Twitter, posted about meeting with Iraqi president Jalal Talabani in his palace — which would give anyone opposed to changing the world 140 characters at a time a good bead on his location. Dorsey posted a photograph of Meetup CEO Scott Heiferman, who in turn lensed Wired scribe Steven Levy in protective gear. Meanwhile, Howcast CEO Jason Liebman boosted international relations by misspelling Talabani's name.

Perhaps to stay in the good graces of their State Department protectors, they've also started to assiduously suck up to their official hosts. Anyone who wants to monitor their Twitter transmissions can do so by using their official "iraqtech" tag. Way to make it convenient for the bad guys to keep tabs on you, Web 2.0 dudes!

Meetup CEO Scott Heiferman:


Wired writer Steven Levy:


(Photos by rbc, jack, and heif )

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5222958&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[They Will Greet Us as Social Networkers]]> Call it the final wave of the American invasion: A passel of tech executives from Google, YouTube, Twitter, and others, squired by a Wired feature writer, are touring Iraq.

The State Department has released the list of minor players traveling to the country to share their thoughts on "how new technologies can be used to build local capacity, foster greater transparency and accountability, build upon anti-corruption efforts, promote critical thinking in the classroom, scale-up civil society, and further empower local entities and individuals by providing the tools for network building":

  • Jason Liebman, CEO-Founder, Howcast
  • David Nassar, VP, Blue State Digital
  • Scott Heiferman, CEO, MeetUp
  • Raanan Bar-Cohen, VP, Automattic/WordPress
  • Richard Robbins, Director of Social Innovation, AT&T
  • Jack Dorsey, Chairman-Founder, Twitter
  • Kannan Pashupathy, Director of International Engineering Operations, Google
  • Ahmad Hamzawi, Head of Engineering, Middle East/North Africa, Google
  • Hunter Walk, Head of Product Development, YouTube
  • Steven Levy, Senior Writer, Wired Magazine

Is this a joke? It sounds like the State Department rounded up all the people who couldn't even qualify to go to Social Web Foo Camp in the woods of Sebastopol, Calif. last weekend. (For example: Jack Dorsey, Twitter's "chairman," has time on his hands after being fired as the comapny's CEO.) In other words, we're hardly sending our best and brightest. Save for the misplaced Levy, a talented writer whose job we do not envy. How will he turn this gang of second stringers into the heroes of a Wired feature?

(Photo by AP)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5221575&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Almost All of Twitter's Mysteries Solved]]> Karen Tumulty of Time told us how senators handle their snuff. John Battelle explained why tweets seem so brainless. But who stole a Wired editor's lunch? Twitter still has secrets.

Time political correspondent Karen Tumulty shared some Capitol trivia.

New York Times TV blogger Brian Stelter experienced a Christian Bale problem.

Federated Media online-ad huckster John Battelle had time to Twitter, but not to think. See how that works?

Wired.com editor Dylan Tweney went hungry after a colleague ate his lunch.

Could the sushi thief have been Wired writer Steven Levy, who confessed to feeling hungry? Nah — Levy was at TED and you weren't.

Anyone else's tweets we should keep an eye on? Send us more Twitter usernames, please.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5147562&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Twitterati Have Major Problems]]> What is it with media people? Twitter seems to drive them to reveal what their readers always suspected: They're all a bit dysfunctional, each in his or her own special way. Especially Julia Allison!

Wired writer Steven Levy felt so guilty about not tweeting more, he wrote a whole long column about it.

Nonsociety egoblogger Julia Allison sent her first post-inaugural-ball tweet suspiciously late the day. She freaked out when she couldn't find her purse. But she later found it, and her camera with pictures of herself with Chad Hurley. This will make everyone but Mrs. Chad Hurley happy.

Mancunian freelance "ournalist" Louise Bolotin ad a prolem with hr keyboar.

Mac columnist Andy Ihnatko also confronted a problem with technology.

Greensboro News & Record editor John Robinson learned you just can't trust corporate executives to tell you the truth.

Anyone else's tweets we should keep an eye on? Send us more Twitter usernames, please.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5136270&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Fake Steve Jobs Unloads on Real Steve Jobs]]> Dan Lyons, the Newsweek columnist who launched his career from obscurity by impersonating Apple's CEO on a viciously satirical blog, has revealed what he really thinks of the man. Put on your blast armor.

See, in the world of Steve, it's all about Steve. When he does go, he will be remembered as a tremendous genius—but also as a petulant narcissist with a grandiose sense of his importance and a sadly limited view of the world around him. Ironically, it is Gates, his archnemesis, who will likely go down in history as the classy one: the one who knew how to exit gracefully, the one who is devoting the later years of his life, and all of his billions, to helping the world's poorest people—and not clinging to his CEO job while he insults reporters and plays petty cat-and-mouse games with Apple shareholders and fanboys.

And this from a man who claims to admire Jobs. Lyons, who stopped blogging last year, seems strangely freed, even in the stifling pages of Newsweek; since he no longer has a sideline pretending to be Steve Jobs, he can say what he really thinks: That Jobs, who had his digestive tract rewired in the course of surgery to treat his pancreatic cancer, and whose health has been troubled ever since, deserves a public evisceration for dodging questions about his illnesses.

Lyons replaced technology writer Steven Levy at Newsweek, whose idea of hard-hitting Apple coverage was to call the iPod a "life-changing cultural icon." Apple regularly rewarded Levy's pieces with exclusives on new gear. Any bets on how many years it will be before Apple gives Newsweek a new iPhone to review?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5128899&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Facebook's Brandee Barker hides from camera while denying Microsoft buyout]]> BoomTown's Kara Swisher went to Palo Alto’s MacArthur Park restaurant for a luncheon hosted by Germany’s Hubert Burda Media yesterday, the organizers of the DLD conference. A target of her shaky videocam work: Facebook flack Brandee Barker, who hid behind a fern. Asked if Microsoft was buying Facebook, Barker shouted, "Never!" Brave words, if not exactly consistent with Facebook's fiduciary duties to shareholders to consider all reasonable offers. Besides Barker, Swisher captured Silicon Valley figures like nerd chanteuse Randi Zuckerberg; Wired writer Steven Levy, fresh from his fly-on-the-wall writeup of the making of Google's Chrome browser; and layoff-happy Loic Le Meur. The crowd is shown descending into a happy drunkenness, giggling about Wall Street all the way down. After the jump, the full clip and a guide to the best moments:

  • 0:55 Loic Le Meur is worried about the economy.
  • 1:14 Brandee Barker hides behind a fern, says Facebook will never sell to Microsoft
  • 2:30 BillShrink’s Peter Pham says a lot of startups are going to go under
  • 2:36 Randi Zuckerberg wants you to register to vote
  • 3:32 Steven Levy says the arrow points no where but up
  • 5:43 Israeli superinvestor Yossi Vardi says that Lehman Brothers stock isn't worth as much as World of Warcraft shields.
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5051348&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Wired kept Google's browser secret]]> Magazines aren't in the business of breaking news. But had Google PR not inadvertently leaked word of its Google Chrome Web browser, Steven Levy's feature in Wired's forthcoming October issue might have been both the first and last word on the project. It required the Faustian bargain typical of fly-on-the-wall features: Get deep inside the company, in exchange for letting the subject dictate the timing of the story. But this story was trickier than most, since Chrome was still a secret when the issue was under production. Normally, dozens of eyes would fall on the story. How did a magazine's labor-heavy business model intersect with Google's maniacal obsession with secrecy? This was, in some ways, the exact opposite of last year's cover story on "radical transparency." Bob Cohn, Wired's executive editor, explained to Valleywag how they pulled it off:

The trick was we knew it was going to launch sometime in early September, and we wanted to be out with it as close as possible. That meant the story had to close in late August when it was still a huge secret. Both Steven and I had made considerable promises that it wouldn't leak from us. We pledged that we could be trusted with this information in advance so we could produce a long-form magazine story on a monthly cycle.

Cohn set aside space for the feature under a codename, "Go Lego" — an obvious anagram of "Google," but also a plausible topic for Wired to cover. Files were saved in space used for the September issue, because "no one ever looks back at the old issue," says Cohn. Then, Cohn told staffers the fake story was cancelled. "We told people that we're going to pull that story for ad sales reasons, but we're going to keep it on the map for bureaucratic reasons," says Cohn. Those in on the secret prepared a fake table of contents and even a cover.

"Only 8 or 10 people knew — not because we don't trust people, but because I and Steven had pledged it would be very closely held," says Cohn. (Wired has a staff of 49, according to the masthead.) "Normally the staff sees the entire magazine. I sent out an email this morning letting people know. A lot of people came into my office surprised there was a story they didn't even know about, words on the cover they hadn't read."

Did it ruffle feathers? Perhaps a little, says Cohn: "This morning an editor told me about a story he was working on, and then he said, 'And there's a secret story I can't tell you about.'"

What's telling about this episode? There's more at work here than the standard negotiations for a fly-on-the-wall feature, I think. Google's workers are so fervent in their do-gooder convictions — that their viewpoints are reasonable, that their requests for secrecy are normal, that their cause is fair and just — that they can't help being a bit infectious. Google Chrome has a feature that puts the browser in an ultraprivate mode. Here's the question: Can Googlers ever turn off their own secrecy switch?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5044629&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Wired's Neal Stephenson mistakes earn wrath of nerds]]> As the token Wired mag contributor in a room full of polymaths on Saturday, I had to endure a recounting of the goofs — sorry, I mean the errata — in Wired's article about "King of Sci-Fi" Neal Stephenson and his new book, Anathem. The article, by Hackers author Steven Levy, is actually a pretty good writeup of the shy but strong-minded Stephenson and his big-think projects with people like Nathan Myhrvold, Alvy Ray Smith and Danny Hillis. But if there's one place you don't want to make a typo, it's in front of a hundred thousand rabidly detail-obsessed Stephenson fans. They'll never shut up now. Rather than hear it again, I sat down with a friend of Stephenson's who helped with the book (it ships on September 9, but advance copies are floating around) and assembled this definitive list of counterfactuals in the article:

Set on a planet called Arbe (pronounced "arb"), Anathem documents a civilization split between two cultures: an indulgent Saecular general population (hooked on casinos, shopping in megastores, trashing the environment—sound familiar?) and the super-educated cohort known as the avaunt, or "auts,"

  • 1. The planet's name is spelled Arbre.
  • 2. They're the avout, not avaunt. It comes from the Latin a- + vovere, to vow. The avout are, literally, those who've vowed to follow the fictional Cartasian discipline.
  • 3. No, no, no, an aut in the book is a rite performed by the avout. Why am I huffy about this? Because Stephenson provides a 20-page glossary at the back of the book.

Their society—the "mathic" world—is clustered in walled-off areas known as concents built around giant clocks designed to last for centuries.

  • 4. Earth already has a 622 year old clock that still runs in the cathedral at Salisbury, England. The science-fiction clocks on planet Arbre are designed to last for millennia, like Danny Hillis's planned 10,000 Year Clock. Many of the clocks in Anathem are several thousand years old.

[Stephenson's] early books, a satire about big universities and an eco-thriller, were well received but not huge sellers. In search of big sales and big bucks, he collaborated with an uncle on a couple of political potboilers. "We heard that Tom Clancy had made something like $17 million the previous year and thought if we could snag 1 percent of that, we'd still be OK." They didn't come close, and in 1991, Stephenson says, his career "was moving along at low rpms." Then he wrote Snow Crash ...

  • 5. Those political thrillers, Interface and The Cobweb, postdate Snow Crash by several years — 1992, 1994 and 1996, respectively.

But hey, nobody's perfect. Anathem itself has at least one glaring mistake: Midway through, the main character describes a group of people as being treated like "movie stars." As Stephenson's previous 491 pages have made abundantly clear, the word "movie" can't possibly be in the narrator's vocabulary — on planet Arbre, they'd be speely stars. Take that, correctards!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5041120&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Newsweek paid Steven Levy six figures to jump to Wired]]> LevySuch is the plight of the dying magazine business: Newsweek paid what's rumored to be a high-six-figures ransom not to keep Steven Levy, its star tech writer, but to unburden itself of him just so he could join Wired. The Washington Post-owned weekly is offering editorial staff generous buyouts, up to two years' salaries, to reduce its headcount. Levy smartly leapt at the offer, knowing he could easily get a job elsewhere. Something seems backwards in this labor market: Don't acquirers normally pay a premium for control?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=370885&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Levy joining Wired as staff writer]]> An internal memo from Wired executive editor Bob Cohn says Steven Levy, Newsweek's tech reporter for 13 years, is joining the magazine as a staff writer. Cohn says Levy is reporting a book on Google. [Romenesko]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=370746&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Steven Levy leaving Newsweek]]> What could dislodge Steven Levy from his perch at Newsweek, the ever-diminishing magazine where he's been the main tech writer for 13 years? An offer from Wired, we hear. Levy has been contributing to Wired since before he joined Newsweek, and he regularly writes features for it on the side. Also in the works: another book. Could it be on Facebook, the subject of a rushed Newsweek cover story last year? (Photo by Teresa Carpenter)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=370381&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[At Macworld, all press are created equal, but some are more equal than others]]> At CES 2008, respectable press and barely-tolerated bloggers were separated into groups with different badges but mostly similar levels of access. At Macworld 2008, there was, theoretically, only one badge for all types of press. In reality? Some hacks were more equal than others.

vipbadge.jpg

  • The lowest level goes to bloggers and reporters from sites with few readers — they get onto the show floor for free, but don't get entry into the all-important Steve Jobs keynote.
  • The standard press badge, pictured above, gives access to all the floor and the special media section of the keynote.
  • The truly special press have the VIP ribbon (left) affixed to their badge. We spotted one on John Markoff of the New York Times, Newsweek's Steven Levy, and Walt Mossberg of the Walt — sorry, Wall Street Journal. A Macworld veteran told us they're reserved for "geezers."

    When the doors opened for press to enter the keynote, broadcast media were let in first — but Mossberg used his clout to cut in line. "I'm VIP," he said, waved his badge and walked past. The rest of us had to deal with security guards with a small Apple logo emblazoned on their black shirts like we were paparazzi waiting to get into a restaurant where Britney Spears was eating.

    We didn't rate VIP status, but we had something better: Fake Steve Jobs!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=345678&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Mossberg slams Kindle — was he bitter about Newsweek exclusive?]]> goat.jpgWalt Mossberg, surprisingly slow out of the gate, has finally deigned to review Amazon.com's Kindle e-book reader. He was not kind, calling it "mediocre" and "marred by annoying flaws." He also says that Amazon "nailed the electronic-book shopping experience," which is no surprise given the success of Amazon.com, "but it has a lot to learn about designing electronic devices." Harsh words from a top reviewer who can make or break a device. Here's our question: what took him so long?

Newsweek had an glowing exclusive review from Steven Levy and New York Times tech reviewer David Pogue wrote up the Kindle soon after it was made public, but it took Mossberg more than a week to review the device. What happened? Another tech columnist told us that Mossberg "was only interested in reviewing it if he could be first. When Steven Levy got it first Walt threw a tantrum." Classy. We also hear Mossberg tried to edge out other reviewers to be first on the iPhone — but got turned down. Incidentally, I still haven't gotten any response from Amazon PR about a review unit. What's up with that? I'll be nicer than Mossberg — maybe.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=328258&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Newsweek botches its Facebook cover]]> You'd think Mark Zuckerberg would be thrilled to make the cover of Newsweek. But secretly, we bet, the CEO and founder of Facebook is fuming. Why? Because the venerable weekly made a newbie mistake on the cover, one that Facebookers find grating. The cover invites readers to "add" Mark as a friend. Yes, the site does have an "Add Friend" dialog, so it's technically correct — but insiders hate the "add" usage, since it's easily confused with MySpace's lingo. Mark's own sister, Randi Jayne, chewed me out a couple weeks ago for that very mistake. And anyone who's used the site — clearly, not Newsweek's editors — knows that the proper terminology is to "request" or "confirm" someone as a friend. The basic gaffe tells us that the rest of the story — a predictable rehash by writer Steven Levy, assisted by eight (eight!) colleagues — can mostly be dismissed with the "Ignore" button. A few interesting status updates, after the jump:

  • Former PayPal CEO Peter Thiel invested $500,000 in Facebook.
  • Zuckerberg clinched his $12.7 million investment in 2005 from Accel Partners by ordering a Sprite, since he was still underage.
  • Facebook raised another $25 million round in 2006.
  • Microsoft's contract to sell ads on Facebook runs through 2011.
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=289040&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Andy Ihnatko, faux Apple CEO?]]> Is Andy Ihnatko Fake Steve Jobs? Valleywag was the first to name him publicly as a candidate for writing the faux diary of Apple CEO Steve Jobs, but now Ihnatko is being fingered again, thanks to a needlessly elaborate Internet sting. Could the longtime Mac columnist be the man behind the curtain?
  • FOR The sense of humor. Ihnatko's writing has verve, panache, and more than its fair share of randomness — traits shared by whoever's writing Fake Steve Jobs.
  • FOR The IP address. At first, I was inclined to dismiss the "discovery" by Web developers at Sitening that Fake Steve Jobs has sent email from a Boston-area Internet connection. (The same data that Sitening uncovered through their elaborate sting operation was available, for months, to anyone who bothered to look at FSJ's email headers, and well known among FSJ trackers.) But everyone, in their rush to re-report this old news, has failed to notice the obvious: Andy Ihnatko is a Verizon customer.
  • FOR The desperation. For all his cunning insights about Apple and the tech world, Fake Steve Jobs appears to be a naif when it comes to business. He's been hitting up potential advertising sponsors for a while, and he recently begged for help with setting up Google AdSense on the FSJ blog, in a post that was subsequently taken down. Ihnatko's own blog, YellowText, also currently doesn't run ads. Is that because Ihnatko makes enough money from his publishing royalties that he doesn't have to bother — or because, like FSJ, he doesn't know how to insert ads onto his blog?
  • FOR The silence. Ihnatko has never written about Fake Steve. Fake Steve has never written about Ihnatko.
That's the case for. Here's why Ihnatko might not be Fake Steve.
  • AGAINST The sense of humor. Ihnatko is funny, but Fake Steve is funnier. Way funnier. If it's Ihnatko, he's saving his best stuff for his alter ego, which might annoy his editors at the Chicago Sun-Times.
  • AGAINST The IP address. Geotargeting is hardly an exact science. Advertisers who try to use it to target local ads know that it's notoriously unreliable. And even if it's accurate in this case, who's to say Fake Steve Jobs wasn't traveling in the Boston area when he sent those emails?
  • AGAINST The insiders. Chris Nolan, the former Silicon Valley gossip columnist who now runs online-content distributor Spot On, insists that FSJ is not a writer, based on her email conversations with him. (Update: Nolan asked me to clarify that she meant a professional writer, which is also how I took it.) Steven Levy of Newsweek, I hear, believes that he's a former Internet-media CEO. And many others believe that FSJ is written by multiple people.
I'm not convinced it's Ihnatko. I'm not convinced it's not. Perhaps Ihnatko, who's agreed to an interview with Valleywag, can clear up matters. We'll see. Until then, the hunt for Fake Steve Jobs continues.]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=278809&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[[Updated] (Not the) first attempted iPhone mugging]]> stevenlevy.JPG[Update: Missing a few seconds, changes everything, apologies: it was just an idiot trying to get some attention by stealing the Fox reporter's mic, not the iPhone. The hordes are getting restless. See the follow up and the video.]

Steven Levy of Newsweek, "one of only four" people allowed to review the iPhone early, was just jumped and nearly mugged, live on Fox News (9:26 AM EDT). The foolish mugger — who appears to have been going for the iPhone, but grabbed the Fox reporter's mic instead — was quickly dispatched by police and camera men. Levy quickly bounced up and proceeded to demo the device (it did not appear to be scratched or harmed for those concerned) with much aplomb to the shaken announcer — even though Fox initially cut away and did not know how to handle the situation. Now that the iPhone will be released, you don't need to hide it... but you might be wise to do so. The video, after the jump.


fox news
Uploaded by hotternews
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=273579&view=rss&microfeed=true