<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, techcrunch20]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, techcrunch20]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/techcrunch20 http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/techcrunch20 <![CDATA[Why Demo's conference beat TechCrunch40]]> Techdirt, the ever-opinionated analysis blog, has weighed in and found Demo's lineup of startups and new products more compelling than last week's TechCrunch40. Why? Mike Masnick doesn't come out and say it, but his implication is clear: Unlike the parade of Web 2.0 one-note-Johnnies drummed up by TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington and entrepreneur Jason Calacanis, most of experienced Demo organizer Chris Shipley's picks were focused on useful improvements to existing technology, not gimmicky new ideas. Arrington and Calacanis launched TechCrunch40 because they felt that it was somehow wrong for conferences to charge startups to present. Nonsense, of course. I think that the fact that Demo charges presenters — reportedly $18,500 apiece — was actually what makes it a stronger event.

Remember when Bill Gross launched the search engine GoTo.com, later Overture, and shocked the industry by ranking listings by how much advertisers were willing to pay? At the time, his pay-per-click model was ripped apart as cynical and sleazy. But paid search ads, it turns out, were the right idea. The willingness of an advertiser to pay, among other factors, was actually a useful criterion for determining whether an ad might be effective, and it's a practice that's making billions of dollars for Google.

I think there's a similar effect here. There was no downside for TechCrunch40's presenting companies; if they gave a lousy presentation, all they wasted was the audience's time. One of the best-received startups was MusicShake. Note that MusicShake is based in South Korea, which means that its founders flew across the Pacific to make their debut, at considerable expense. They may not have paid Calacanis and Arrington anything, but unlike most of their peers, they actually had skin in the game.

Contrast that to the sloppy demos given by some Bay Area startuppers who only had to roll out of bed to get there — and looked like they just had.

By contrast, every company at Demo had some money at stake. It might not have been a big risk, but it was enough to make them take the event seriously. Shipley told me earlier this week:

Demo is involved in helping companies launch their products, and there are costs associated with that. That doesn't remove the hurdle of qualifying and being selected to participate. The fee is a commitment for a small company. It does signal a seriousness of intent — it is a bit of a bar for a company, and if you're able to clear that hurdle, that means that there's more at stake and the company is perhaps more viable.
Exactly right, of course. (More's the pity for the companies that tried to two-time Demo and got kicked out.)

The irony is that when I reported that DemoPit, TechCrunch40's for-pay sideshow that required startups to buy a ticket to the event, Calacanis blusteringly defended his event along much the same lines as Shipley, citing the costs of putting it on. Of course. But by making startups share those costs, Shipley is putting the invisible hand of capitalism to work as a useful sorting function. You know her companies won't waste your time. Why? They have money on the line.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=304838&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The TechCrunch40 aftermath]]> Congratulations to entrepreneur Aaron Patzer, pictured above with an oversized novelty check. His financial-services startup Mint was the big winner in this week's TechCrunch40 conference, bringing home the $50,000 prize for being the "best in show." So, what was the overall view of TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington and entrepreneur Jason Calacanis's big event? This take, sent to us late last night from an out-of-town journalist, explains it better than we could.

I'm drunk. But that's okay, because my editor spiked my TechCrunch piece. "This isn't what we expected at all," he said of the show, having been lured by the big-brain judges and the presumption that Arrington's top-secret reveal would be another iPhone. I suspect the next such blind event will have trouble getting reporters to show up, except the sort such as Wired who make themselves part of the story. These effectively worked for Arrington this week, publishing what he wanted when he wanted. Given the endless EMBARGO EMBARGO EMBARGO rules I couldn't keep straight, it was a relief to have no actual news to break. I forget my point, but see you somewhere else next year.
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301665&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Liquidating the TechCrunch40 at Fluid]]> My fellow Valleywaggers Owen Thomas and Nick Douglas were banned from the TechCrunch40 conference, and, odds are, I would have been banned from the afterparty at Fluid nightclub, had I asked permission to attend. So, I didn't bother asking, and scrounged up a ticket though back-channel connections, instead. Specifically, through the generosity of my new crush, the mysterious "TechCrunch40" Twitter guy, who left an envelope with an extra ticket and a cryptic note with the bartender at the House of Shields around the corner from Fluid. (Turns out "TechCrunch40" is a group effort — the note was signed by Rick Diculous, El Guapo, Mr. Gray, and Harvey Farquard.)

So, how was the crowd? Michael Arrington was there, of course, holding court and greeting well-wishers. TechCrunch CEO Heather Harde overviewed the event. Lots of TechCrunch40 presenters and DemoPit participants showed up, including Powerset CEO Barney Pell, who declined to take credit for his company's vodka giveaway, though he was a fan of the fun schwag.

I asked Pell about his company's participation in TechCrunch40. Powerset has gotten a fair bit of press in the past year. Wasn't the whole purpose of the conference to show off undiscovered companies? Pell told me that the conference organizers had actually come to him and asked Powerset to present. Interesting.

I, unfortunately, missed MC Hammer, though fellow TechCrunch40 "panel of experts" member Sarah Lacy (pictured above, with Arrington) was there. No Jason Calacanis, though. When asked about his partner's whereabouts, Arrington guessed Calacanis skipped the event. Running a conference does tend to tucker people out. So much for his treadmill workouts.

As the night went on, the over business agendas came out. One startup founder talked to me about his desire to sell for "at least $20 million" and started strategizing about potential buyers to target. Another presenting company was a bit more level-headed about the event. When asked about his reaction to being selected as one of the 40 lucky ones, he demurred. "It's not going to make us or break us, but it's nice," he said. Nice. Oooh. That hurts. Somehow I doubt, of all the words Calacanis and Arrington might be hoping to have carved on their tombstones, "nice" was on the list.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301200&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The TechCrunch40 attendee who's been brutally...]]> The TechCrunch40 attendee who's been brutally parodying the conference on Twitter as "Techcrunch40" says that the service — whose founder, Evan Williams, is a TechCrunch40 panelist — abruptly changed his username to "NotTechcrunch40." [Twitter]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301204&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[TechCrunch40 is the Comdex of Web 2.0]]>

Only the more grizzled members of San Francisco's press corp even remember Comdex. The once-legendary — and infamous — tech expo was hot well into the '90s, but it rapidly fell to pieces as it overexpanded. As desperate gadget hawkers tried to lure attendees to see their wares, they hired comely "booth babes" to staff their exhibits. TechCrunch40, the Web 2.0 startup conference organized by TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington and entrepreneur Jason Calacanis, is infinitely smaller than Comdex ever was. But the comparison is still apt. Bypassing Comdex's successful years, TechCrunch40 is going straight for the seedy, desperate late stage of Comdex, as these two short-shorts-wearing publicity-mongers prove. (Photo by Myles Weissleder)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301197&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Michael Arrington's pet photo copier]]> ProfileBuilder is a sponsor of TechCrunch40, the startup conference organized by TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington. It's also the subject of a glowing, "exclusive" writeup in TechCrunch today. Coincidence? I'll let you decide. The writeup celebrates ProfileBuilder's acquisition of ZingFu. Say who buys say whom? Exactly. These are companies you're unlikely to need to care about, ever. Except to note this: The friendly TechCrunch article doesn't mention ZingFu's nasty habit of nicking copyrighted images, like this photo of Arrington by Laughing Squid blogger Scott Beale, with no fair-use rationale in sight.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301181&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Mark Cuban disses Jason Calacanis]]> Mark CubanSo much for old pals. Mark Cuban, the owner of the Dallas Mavericks and billionaire founder of Broadcast.com, was Jason Calacanis's original backer at Weblogs Inc. And Cuban had agreed to show up at Calacanis's latest venture, the TechCrunch40 conference, as an expert judge. Cuban's still listed on the site, but he's a no-show at the conference, attendees say. Why? Apparently he's taping the ABC reality series "Dancing with the Stars." He's surely having a better time being critiqued for his soft-shoe technique than debating the merits of startups like Orgoo, Kerpoof, and ZocDoc. Once again, old media trumps new media.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301175&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Don't mess with Michael Arrington]]> Prickly TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington is given to griping about PR people and their capricious rules. But he's not above setting his own rules when it comes to his TechCrunch40 conference. Specifically, presenting companies have been required to observe a press embargo until their turn on stage, and violators may be yanked from the lineup. With only 10 companies left to go, it seems like most of the startups have been sheepishly obedient to this rule. Anyone get yanked? Let us know. The full rules and regulations after the jump.

Subject: TechCrunch40 Conference: Final Details and Embargoed Information Release Schedule

Dear Members of the Press,

Michael, Jason and I look forward to hosting you at the TechCrunch40 Conference this coming Monday-Tuesday, September 17-18 at the Palace Hotel. We're incredibly proud of our line-up of start-up companies to be unveiled over our two day agenda and look forward to your critical eyes.

As you can imagine, our 40 presenting companies and 100 DemoPit participants are incredibly anxious to reach out to you during the conference. Since the format of our agenda is a bit different from other conferences, we wanted to share additional details about logistics and embargos to help make sure we communicate expectations to all clearly.

IMPORTANT Embargoed Information

9 am PST Monday, September 17

Press may release the names of the 39 companies selected for TechCrunch40 starting at 9 am pst, Monday September 17. We have elected one wildcard presentation slot that will be based on "audience choice voting" from the 100 DemoPit companies pitching in the Gold Ballroom. The 40th company will present during the last demo slot on the agenda, Tuesday afternoon. All 40 companies are eligible to win the TechCrunch40 $50,000 grand prize to be selected by our expert advisors and TechCrunch40 team.

Individual Company Embargoes, Rolling Based on On-Stage Presentations

Press may release coverage about the 39 companies individually starting with their respective on-stage presentations at the conference. Companies will not be launching their sites to the public until they go on stage to present. We reserve the right to pull any presenting company that does not comply with these policies. We will have classroom seating in rows reserved at the front of the Grand Ballroom exclusively for Press, and we will be providing dedicated Internet access to Press vs the general audience to facilitate live blogging at the event, etc.

Press Registration and Press Room

Press will be invited to check-in at the Ralston Room of the Palace Hotel (to the right of the Garden Court) starting at 7 am. The program guide and techcrunch40.com will have complete information about the TechCrunch40 companies.

We have a dedicated Press Room in the Sacramento Room on Mezzanine Level of the Palace Hotel open 7 am - 7 pm each Monday and Tuesday exclusively for your use.

We're really anxious to start the show. See you soon,

—Jason, Michael and Heather

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301164&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Letting loose at TechCrunch40]]> Microsoft executive Don Dodge captures a moment from the TechCrunch40 conference. Or, more specifically, after the conference, in the limo ferrying VIPs from the TechCrunch40 VIP dinner to the after party at Fluid. Pictured, from left, Mayfield Fund VC Raj Kapoor on the floor of the limo; Allen Morgan, also from Mayfield, throwing gang signs; DanceJam cofounder MC Hammer; and angel investor Ron Conway, looking bewildered.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301151&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[I'm too sexy for my install script]]> It's traditional for software developers to put their names on a product. When you launch Photoshop, for example, a long list of small-type names flashes on the screen while the product loads. But pictures? That's an innovation, as far as I know. Engineers at Xobni, the email-software startup which just presented at the TechCrunch40 conference and launched its first product in beta, pasted in photos of themselves that display when their software finishes installing. Perhaps they'll get some dates for their trouble. If not users.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301109&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[TechCrunch40's VC sponsors]]> A Valleywag tipster whispers that a company that had made the initial cut of 20 companies for the Techcrunch40 conference — back when it was known as "TechCrunch20" — got bumped when conference organizers "doubled down" and expanded the list to 40 startups. The company's sin? Competing with a startup funded by one of TechCrunch40's four VC sponsors. The competitor got bumped, and room was made for a sponsor-backed startup. "Ah, the Valley mafia at its finest," the tipster concludes. Of course. Sand Hill Road was built on conflicts of interest.

If true, then the organizers — Internet entrepreneur Jason Calacanis and TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington — have figured out a very clever hack on the startup-conference business model. Instead of charging startups directly, charge venture capitalists to let their favored portfolio companies in. And throw in a handful of unfunded startups to make it all look above-board. Surely the sponsors — Sequoia Capital, which has backed Calacanis's Mahalo; Mayfield Fund; Charles River Ventures; and Clearstone Venture Partners — would heartily approve of this scheme. It's brilliant. Ingenious. My hat is off to you, Jason and Michael, if you have indeed pulled this off.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300996&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Do the TechCrunch40 startups need a $50,000 prize?]]> TechCrunch40 is different, organizer Jason Calacanis claims, from most startup conferences in not charging companies to present there. Never mind that, in fact, he and TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington are charging 100 companies to present at the conference's subsidiary DemoPit. The notion was that TechCrunch40 might discover promising companies that couldn't afford to present at a pay-to-play conference. But in reality, most of the 40 startups presenting here don't even need the $50,000 cash award. For them, at most, it might fund a nice victory bash.

If the winner was determined by online votes rather than the expert panel, it's a virtual lock that the winning startup will have millions in funding. So much for the egalitarian promise of the event. Two-thirds of the startups have some form of funding, mostly series A. Of the known funded companies, the average funding is $5.8 million. The top three are, unsurprisingly, all funded. (I'm discounting Viewdle, because late last night they had a 3.5 rating on 58 votes, but now have a 4.5 rating on 163 votes, the largest overnight jump. I applaud the apparent attempt to game the system, but I'm not going to include its effect here.)

MusicShake, with $3 million in funding, was the far-and-away early favorite. Too much money, however, may have a numbing effect on voters: All three companies with more than $10 million settle into the crowded middle. DocStoc, Cake Financial, and 8020 Publishing haven't disclosed how much funding they have received. Loudtalks, a small, unfunded startup from Russia, didn't fare well with the Valley crowd, taking the caboose with a low rating of 2.2. (Data based on votes as of 8:15 a.m. Pacific Time.)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300940&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Jason Calacanis is Willy Wonka]]> I've always had trouble understanding Jason Calacanis's rationalizations for DemoPit, the sleaziest part of the TechCrunch40 conference. Calacanis and his partner-in-wasting-time, TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington, launched the conference promising not to charge companies to demonstrate, as other startup conferences did. But then Calacanis turned around and announced DemoPit, a side room for also-rans to hawk their Web-based wares. He snuck in the news that the 100 DemoPit participants would have to buy a ticket — a sneaky way to charge, after all, for the right to demonstrate. Taking into account all the direct costs, Calacanis should turn a tidy profit on the sideline, I calculated. When I called him on it, Calacanis blustered and blathered, calling me a "pariah" for daring to question him. Charming. But then I figured it out: Jason Calacanis is Willy Wonka, the magical candyman. And the DemoPit participants are his Oompa Loompas.


Why? Well, Calacanis has realized the flaw in his DemoPit plan. No one, of course, is going to stray from the main ballroom to go into the DemoPit. Why would they? The conference is called the TechCrunch40, not the TechCrunch140. So he sweetened the pot by promising a slot in the top 40 to one lucky DemoPit participant.

Does this remind anyone else of Wonka's Golden Ticket? Calacanis sells his overpriced, bad-for-you, junk-food sweet by promising something fun. Suddently the DemoPitters aren't buying a conference ticket — they're buying a lottery ticket. And damn the odds — they're all convinced that they alone deserve the prize.

Of course, none of the startups are actually Charlie Bucket, or even Violet Beauregarde or another of Wonka's less-fortunate guests. They're Oompa Loompas, working to line Calacanis's pocket. It's a brilliant business move for Calacanis, of course, if completely at odds with his promises not to profit from the startups his conference showcases.

As with Wonka, when Calacanis shows up, a magical river of something chocolate-colored begins to flow.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300694&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Your Twitter makes my heart go flitter]]> FROM THE DESK OF MEGAN MCCARTHY — Is it possible to have a crush on a Twitter stream? Cause I do. Whoever you are, mysterious TC40 guest posting as "TechCrunch40" on Twitter, you need to call me. Now. A girl has needs.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300640&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Meanwhile, in the real world of business]]> The Web 2.0 startups featured at TechCrunch40 are adorable, really. But they can't compete with the draw of a real business with real, paying customers, Six Apart executive Michael Sippey points out: "Around the corner from tc40 there are 7000 people at salesforce.com's conference." Salesforce.com, unlike most of the startups on display at TechCrunch40, dares to charge for its Web-based software — a recipe for disaster, according to TechCrunch40 organizer Michael Arrington. Right. If you consider half a billion dollars in annual revenues to be a disaster, that is.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300661&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Startups face a wireless disconnect]]> Jason CalacanisTechCrunch40 organizer Jason Calacanis is madly spinning the glitch-filled presentations at his conference as a success. The back channel — on Twitter and IRC — begs to differ. The biggest problem: There's no cell phone service deep inside the Sheraton Palace, the hotel in which the conference is being held. You'd think organizers might have checked such a thing before scheduling wireless startups to go on stage with live demos, but no. Instead, with no canned presentations to show, entrepreneurs are attempting to talk about how cool their mobile Web products would be ... if they worked.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300655&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[TechCrunch40 gets a bitter Twitter]]> Brilliant. Someone — apparently a rejected applicant for the TechCrunch40 conference going on now in San Francisco — has hijacked the shindig's name for a Twitter account and is skewering the presenters' every misstep live. Already, the organizers' lack of selectivity — if you'll recall, it was originally supposed to be 20, not 40, startups — is becoming clear. "Thus far, 50% of presenters have a better way to search for Britney Spears... GENIUS! (psych)" reads one Twitter.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300599&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Valley rallies for TechCrunch borefest]]> I have never been more grateful to Jason Calacanis. The prickly Internet entrepreneur disinvited me, you see, from TechCrunch40, the conference opening today in San Francisco that he organized with TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington. And thereby saved me from a long nap at the Sheraton Palace. The conference was originally supposed to highlight 20 companies, but Arrington and Calacanis couldn't decide on just 20, so they "doubled down" and expanded the list to 40, ostensibly because all the companies were so great. But then we all saw the list last night. I'd considered jumping off my red-eye flight and heading to the Sheraton Palace — indeed, friends begged me to just show up and see what happened. But going by the list of startups presenting there — Zivity? Orgoo? — I'm just as content to get your reports and post the best of them.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300581&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Are you hot enough for TechCrunch20?]]> Want to get into TechCrunch20, the upcoming startup conference held by Mahalo CEO Jason Calacanis and TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington? Are you "RELIABLE," between 5'7" and 5'9" and have "long hair and a petite frame?" This is could be your chance. According to an ad on Craigslist, two models are needed to work all day on September 18, the second day of TechCrunch20, doing promotions for a "media company" in San Francisco's "Financial District." Interested? Just send in your resume, headshot, and full body shot to techcrunchmodel@gmail.com. But which "media company" is it?

We suspect the company is one of the startups presenting in the DemoPit, or some perv trolling for pictures. (Possibly both!) It's not the conference organizers, that's for sure. We checked with Arrington, who denied placing the ad. "Not us" he remarked, adding that he'd never heard of the ad before we brought it to his attention. The people who posted it, he surmised are "probably looking for a post on Valleywag." Well, we aim to please.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=295290&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Uncov needs cash to crash TechCrunch20 conference]]> The crew from Uncov, the sarcastic self-styled anti-TechCrunch, wants to attend TechCrunch20. That, of course, is the conference where TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington will bless us with 20 demonstrations of the hottest new startups. Uncov's editors say they want to ask the hard questions we all suspect won't be posed to Arrington's handpicked favorites. But attendance, alas, isn't free. Each ticket costs $2,495. So the "bunch of poor startup founders who write a marginally popular blog that doesn't have any advertising on it" are having a hard time making ends meet. If you don't want Uncov absent at the TechCrunch20 "jerkoff," you can make a donation. So far, they have raised a whopping $185! So they need your support.

Fortunately, we're not the only ones who want to see Uncov asking tough questions of Arrington, Calacanis, and crew. We hear that a wealthy venture capitalist has already pledged one full ticket. But keep donating, the rumored ticket may not materialize, and we want to send the whole team! The Uncov crew promises not to disappoint:

So here's the deal: if any readers out there just have too much money, send us to TC20. We'll ask real questions, hopefully in front of everybody, and videotape it. We'll put the hilarity on YouTube for all to see. Maybe we can even make people realize what a farce the whole thing is.

Yes, I will make fun of Jason Calacanis for being functionally useless. Yes, I will make fun of MC Hammer for having been around the world from London to the Bay and still not being qualified to judge tech companies. And yes, I will make fun of Michael Arrington for running this whole circus as a profit center and billing it as a charitable service to Web 2.0 companies.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=294705&view=rss&microfeed=true