<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, the economist]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, the economist]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/theeconomist http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/theeconomist <![CDATA[The Economist reduced to reblogging Wired]]> My Wired essay "Kill Your Blog" has spawned a charmingly identical piece in The Economist's print edition this week. Same theme, same Jason Calacanis quote from July. But read this part out loud: "A decade ago, PDAs were the preserve of digerati who liked using electronic address books and calendars. Now they are gone, but they are also ubiquitous, as features of almost every mobile phone." I'd love to meet The Economist's anonymous author, if only to confirm that anyone on Earth actually talks that way.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5078818&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[An energy debate brought to you by BP]]> We don't need any energy technology breakthrough to solve the climate-change problem. At least, that's the Tthesis posited by The Economist in a debate sponsored by everyone's favorite multinational oil company, British Petroleum Beyond Petroleum. The ayes are having it so far. Joseph Romm from the Center for American Progress takes the pro, Peter Meisen of the Global Energy Network Institute takes the con, and Earth2Tech's Katie Fehrenbacher argues the corollary for conservation through increased efficiency.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5040095&view=rss&microfeed=true