<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, tubemogul]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, tubemogul]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/tubemogul http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/tubemogul <![CDATA[YouTube spends on new features for users, but has forgotten video creators]]> Yesterday, YouTube acquired Omnisio, a Valley startup that developed tools to allow users to trim online videos and assemble multiple clips together. The company also started deploying speech-to-text technology to create searchable data from within videos, starting with videos from the Obama and McCain campaigns — this will make opposition research so much easier! But have you tried uploading a video to YouTube recently? The experienced hasn't changed in months, if not years.

Basic tools to help creators and other uploaders — like an upload status bar or a timer to let you know when an uploaded clip has been transcoded — are missing. For large clips, this can be maddening. Make a mistake uploading a clip? Good luck trying to replace the clip you've already uploaded with another. And if you accidentally upload the same clip twice, that's just time lost, since even with new descriptions set it'll be flagged as a "duplicate" and deleted. If your audio suddenly sounds terrible, its because YouTube forces it through a blunt compression filter. But hey, you can add funny captions to your videos!

When it comes to user experience for content creators, Vimeo and Blip.tv beat it soundly. But then why should YouTube care? If you want access to viewers who will inevitably slag you and your work in the comments, you'll have to put up with it to a degree. Better to post your content to YouTube via third-party tools like TubeMogul, which will also cross-post your video to multiple sites — making it the one-stop shop for content creators looking to publish that YouTube might have been.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5031576&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[YouTube blowing away competition as distribution platform]]> TubeMogul, a startup which allows content creators to post video clips to multiple sites at once and track aggregate views for the clip across sites, did a survey of over 200,000 clips and how much traffic they garnered after 90 days. The results? The average clip got more views on YouTube in three months (3,092) than on the next eight video sites combined (2,092). [NewTeeVee]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5025991&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[YouTube vixen tries product she pitched, spits it out]]> Jill Hanner, the popular YouTube personality known as xgobobeanx who was hired to produce a response video to a Coors Light viral video campaign meant to popularize the watery brew with the binge drinkers of tomorrow, has now posted a response to the response to her video. In Revised XXX Beer Commercial, she cavorts in a bikini top with a blurred out can of "brand x" beer but spit-takes after taking a taste. "Ugh, this stuff is gross." Which, in the case of Coors Light, is something that both non-drinkers and hardcore beer afficionados can agree on. Needless to say, I doubt video distributor TubeMogul and production company For Your Imagination commissioned this spot. Full video in all it's busty, beer swilling glory after the jump.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5017685&view=rss&microfeed=true