<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, valleywag hotties]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, valleywag hotties]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/valleywaghotties http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/valleywaghotties <![CDATA[Web 2.Ooh: Scandal, robots, and your new king and queen]]>

First off, let's congratulate the Web 2.Ooh winners, Om "Giggity" Malik and Joey "Boomer" Wan!

This fall, Om will star in a biopic of Matt Damon and Ben Affleck, playing both actors at the same time. Joey will save the human race from the Cylons in a very special "Battlestar Galactica," before starring in a remake of "My Pal Joey."

As for the tourney itself, who knew the race to find the hottest boy and girl of Web 2.0 would end in such fierce competition?

Stirr's Joey Wan was clearly winning in the last poll of the ladies' edition, until a supporter of Socialtext's Julia French went and botted it up with eight thousand fake votes. Like an Olympian on cold medicine, it's not French's fault we have to disqualify her — it's the fault of those javascripting bastards.

Meanwhile, the men's edition quietly progressed all weekend, netting a mere 332 votes, with GigaOM founder Om Malik ahead of Rubyred Labs founder Jon Grubb by a healthy handful.

Finale of Web 2.Ooh Ladies' Round and Men's Round [Valleywag]
Photos by Laughing Squid's Scott Beale and Joey Wan [Flickr]

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=197208&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Web 2.Ooh: Get ready for the finals!]]> All right, waggers, it's time for the final round of Web 2.Ooh, the tournament of face-offs between the Valley's community-participatory-Ajax-new-media-wossname hotshots! Our semifinals brought the contenders down to Joey Wan, Julia French, Jonathan Grubb, and Om Malik!

Remember, for the final round, cheating with voting scripts will make you more of a loser than a startup that can't get a positive review on TechCrunch! If you want to cheat, cheat using humans, not robots!

Part of Web 2.Ooh: Men's edition and Ladies' edition [Valleywag]

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=196543&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Web 2.Ooh: Four ladies up]]>

We're closing the polls, and only four ladies are left in Web 2.Ooh, the tourney of webhead hotties. Well, five, actually — since at least two of the polls were rigged (damn you geeks and your voting scripts), we're moving both members of the most egregiously cheated-on face-off up to the next round. (At Valleywag, cheaters prosper!)

So give a big hand to Rachel, Joanne, Valerie, Micki, and Julia! See the grisly details below — especially the race won by one vote.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

Part of Web 2.Ooh, all the lovely ladies edition [Valleywag]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=195334&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Web 2.Ooh: Four boys down]]>

Time to close the polls for the first stage of the Web 2.Ooh Valleywag Hotties Tourney! Meet the four surviving men: Matt, Jon, Om, and Chris!

Matt Mullenweg whumped Will Pate with over two-thirds the vote.
Jonthan Grubb trounced Auren Hoffman — one social butterfly goes back in the cocoon today. (Someone was running scripts, but since when has Valleywag cared about fairness? Just DON'T DO IT AGAIN. Or...or else.)
Om Malik scoops Mike Arrington to advance to stage 2.
Finally, a close contest! Chris MacAskill outcharms Philip Rosedale — which is fortunate, 'cause you've got to see this photo of Chris in the next round.

Voting for the ladies continues until tomorrow. After the break, check out the vote results in detail.

The only reason I run this tourney is for the pretty red and blue bars.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=195046&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Web Two Point Ooh: Ladies' round]]>

Everyone's been just fantastic today, voting for hotties in the men's round of Web 2.Ooh, the latest Valleywag hotties tournament. We're shutting down the men's polls in the morning, but meanwhile we're starting the votes for the ladies of Web 2.0. From left to right, they are:

Top row: Vlogger Amanda Congdon, 88SLIDE's Rachel Smith Rhodes, Stirr's Joanne Wan, Citizen Agency's Tara Hunt

Bottom row: Ning's Gina Bianchini, PodTech's Valerie Cunningham, Revver's Micki Krimmel, Socialtext's Julia French

Give them a hand, then give them your votes when these hotties face off in Round 2 of the Web 2.Ooh Tourney.

Photos by Will Pate, 88SLIDE, Joanne Wan, Tara Hunt, Yoz Grahame, Tantek Celik, Kris Krug, and Alexander Haislip.

Earlier: Web Two Point Ooh: Men's round [Valleywag]
Vote on the men: Posts tagged Web2Ooh [Valleywag]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=194762&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Web Two Point Ooh: Men's round]]>

Say hello to the contestants for this week's Valleywag hotties tourney, Web Two Point Ooh, nominated by their peers, then hand-picked for a face-off of the sexiest boys and girls of Web 2.0. Above, the male half, which we'll be voting on tonight. From left to right, they are:

Top row: Flock's Will Pate, WordPress's Matt Mullenweg, RapLeaf's Auren Hoffman, Rubyred Labs' Jonathan Grubb

Bottom row: GigaOM's Om Malik, TechCrunch's Michael Arrington, SmugMug's Chris MacAskill, Second Life's Philip Rosedale

To follow the contest and vote for these fine gentlemen and eight lovely ladies, watch posts tagged "web2ooh" throughout the week. Click through for photo credits and tourney brackets.

Brackets.jpg

Photos by Kris Krug, Matt Mullenweg, Auren Hoffman, Scott Beale, Scott Beale, Scott Beale, Toni MacAskill, and Esther Dyson

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=194488&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Nominate your favorite Web 2.0 hottie]]> Valleywag's non-readers have grumbled lately that the site is shallow, flighty, and obsessed with "pretty people." Damn right.

That's why next week, we're holding the Will Pate Memorial Web 2.0 Hotties Showdown, a single-elimination tournament of the cutest guys and girls running the New Shiny Internet. Send your nominations to tips@valleywag.com with the subject "Web 2.0 Hottie" — and include a photo that you own the rights to (or a Creative-Commons-licensed photo). All nominees must be core team members of a Web 2.0 startup.

By next Friday, we'll all know who cleans up good with Ajax and who looks hot in a pastel gradient.

Pictured: Will Pate, Flockstar [Elea Chang on Flickr]
Earlier hotties contests:
Snacky or Flacky
Gorgeous Google Gals
Valleywag Hotties (Beefcake edition)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=191427&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Snacky or Flacky: The first three nominees]]> They're charming so we don't have to be — Valley PR folks will win your heart over in the Snacky or Flacky tournament. The first batch of reader-nominated flacks is served fresh and piping hot.


The flack: Susan MacTavish Best
The firm: Best PR, founder
The pic: Susan and Jim [SmugMug]
The big client: Craigslist
The juice: Best has been lovey-dovey with Craigslist CEO Jim Buckmaster (pictured).

Paula Gould - Valleywag
The flack: Paula Gould
The firm: TagWorld, PR director
The pic: TagWorld [Flickr]
The juice: The only PR person you can hook up with on a social site and not feel creepy

miles-perkins.jpg
The flack: Miles Perkins
The firm: Industrial Light and Magic, senior publicist
The pic: Miles Perkins [Enigmaterial]
The juice: Perkins plays bass for the swingingest of jazz bands, Mingus Amungus.

Keep sending in the noms — e-mail tips@valleywag.com (subject: Snacky or Flacky), IM HeyValleywag, or comment below. (For instance, where are a certain male Google flack's rabid fans?) Next week, the best noms battle for your hearts.

Part of: Valleywag hotties: Snacky or Flacky? [Valleywag]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=169597&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[PR Valleywag hotties: Snacky or flacky?]]> PR stock photo - ValleywagIs it just me, or is the news full of ugly people this week? It's time to bring out the pretty folks in public relations — those kids in PR may not be the brightest, but they bring the beauty.

So by Friday, send photos your favorite flacks (guys and girls) to tips@valleywag.com. Next week the prettiest in PR will battle in Valleywag Hotties: Snacky or Flacky.

Bonus points for adding a bio, because we care about personality. Hokey "FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE" jokes are allowed and in fact encouraged. Do let Valleywag know if we can finger you as the nominator, and use "Snacky or Flacky" in the subject line.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=169442&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Shai Agassi: Valleywag hottie?]]> Is Shai Agassi hot? The SF Chron's Technology Chronicles blog isn't sure if the SAP board member is enough eye candy to draw crowds to a boring press event. But the Chron's "hot or not?" link only goes to Hot or Not's main page. So I did it up right for you: go to Hot or Not and rate Shai Agassi on a scale of 1 to super-steamy.

Shai Agassi on Hot or Not

Too sexy for his software? [Technology Chronicles]
Shai Agassi: Hot or Not? [Hot or Not]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=165864&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Who's that Googler: the Google Romancers]]> How'd we miss this Google gal? The Google Romance model was the perfect poster girl (with such a cute poster boy!) for the seductive power of contextual ads. Says a reader:

i'm assuming she's an employee...how did we miss her in the contest? i beg you, use your awesome powers of persusaion to find the answer to this riddle.

gracias.

—anonymous grad student

Good question! And who's her boy, too? Google insiders, fire up your anonymous Hotmail accounts and tip off tips@valleywag.com. Meanwhile, I'll pump my contacts. But Google's a big and scary place, and we'll need some Distributed Stalking to uncover the Google Romance lady's identity.

Google Romance [Google]
Earlier: Google Romance [Valleywag]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=164793&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Gorgeous Google Gals: Jen Ingalls vs. Jen Bradburn]]> Time for the second Valleywag Hotties tournament to really get underway — it's the first Google Gals face-off. Voting ends tonight for this pair of lovely Google sales members. Remember, engineers may be brilliant, but salespeople won't stay up building Lego towers at 3 AM.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

Part of: Gorgeous Google Gals [Valleywag]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=157665&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Gorgeous Google Gals: The tournament begins]]> The Google Gals competitors have been chosen. No second-guessing, no arguing — unless you want to bribe me with a bundle of Google stock. (Or a portfolio shorting that stock — I'm all confused.)

From left to right, row one: Jen Ingalls, Jen Bradburn, Laura Granka, Niniane Wang

Row two: Gabriela Valdes, Kimbalina (anyone got a last name?), Trisha Weir, and Elizabeth Windram.

For your printing-and-obsessively-filling-out needs, the tourney bracket is after the jump.

The nominees: page 1, page 2, page 3 [Valleywag]
Earlier Valleywag hotties tourney: Valleywag hotties: Vote for the sexiest man in tech [Valleywag]

google-gals-bracket.jpg

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=157562&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Google gals: four more dears]]>

Another round of nominated Google hotties! From left to right:

Krista Bruen from finance is yet another ungoogleable.

Ginger Franke would describe herself as "action-centered." She's a serious snowboarder who's been seen headed for black-diamond routes.

Jen Bradburn is a hottie from sales who graduated from St. Mary's.

Laura Granka "looks really hot in spandex, incredible passion for life, and is an expert in eye-movement monitoring. What's hotter than that?"

There are dozens more out there. Don't hide the hotties! You have one weekend to nominate Google gals before Valleywag runs its tourney. Send names, photos, and character notes to tips@valleywag.com.

Earlier: Google girls: the first nominees [Valleywag]
And: Gorgeous girls of Google: a call for nominations [Valleywag]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=156869&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[George Zachary: not gay, just Greek]]> George Zachary's Valleywag Hotties sunbathing photo inspired a Sand Hill Slave post and this eavesdrop from a tipster:

Internet girlfriend: Have you seen the George Zachary photo? That guy is *so* gay.

Internet mogul: He's not gay. He's just Greek.

George Zachary Makes Sand Hill Slave Eat Crow. Thanks George! [Sand Hill Slave]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=156395&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Nathan Tyler, the hottest man in Google]]> The Gorgeous girls of Google post has attracted some great Google-girl nominees. A couple of tips: Send us photos if you have 'em, and tell as much as you can about your picks. Gotta make this fun for the people outside the Plex, right?

And if all this hasn't enough to make Valleywag an official Silicon Valley dating site, here's one more plug for a male Google hottie:

Nathan Tyler is totally hot.

Nathan Tyler is to sexy as Chuck Norris is to lethal.

Your commentsers are on the right track, but I think all Valleywag readers deserve an opportunity to judge for themselves.

Here's evidence.

Signed,

— NATHAN TYLER DESERVES HIS OWN GOOGLE HOTTIE THREAD

I'm told these photos still don't do him justice. By the way, he's totally straight — since it makes such a difference to your chances, I'm sure.

Another shot of the Nathan Tyler Hotness Machine after the jump.

nate-tyler-2.jpg

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=156207&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Gorgeous girls of Google: a call for nominations]]> Rejoice, straight men of the Valley. Next week will feature a new edition of Valleywag Hotties, featuring the most gorgeous Google girls.

Some contestants are obvious — search VP Marissa Mayer, international VP Sukhinder Singh Cassidy, and deputy general counsel Miriam Rivera. But contestants don't have to be VP-level execs. Any engineer or ad saleswoman is eligible. Send nominations to tips@valleywag.com with "Google girls" in the subject.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=155938&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Valleywag Hotties champion: Ben Trott, so hott]]> The final face-off is over. Ben Trott trounced Jim Buckmaster (76.3% to 23.7%) to claim the Valleywag Hotties championship. The Six Apart co-founder was swept to victory by an adoring army of Livejournal users (and by being hot as hell). Craigslist CEO Buckmaster has gracefully conceded. I, for one, welcome our new Trott overlord.

That's all for the Valleywag Hotties, Men's Edition. Next up are the Google Gals. Send your nominations — all ladies of Google are eligible — to tips@valleywag.com.

jim-hangs-head.jpg
Jim, crushed by defeat, nearly drops the cat. [Source]

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=155715&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Valleywag Hotties final round: Jim Buckmaster vs. Ben Trott]]> And now, the fight to end all fights.

Jim Buckmaster, Craigslist CEO and Jeff Goldblum lookalike, beat Jonathan Ive, Steve Jobs, and George Zachary.

Ben Trott, dashing Six Apart co-founder, whipped Kevin Rose, Max Levchin, and Jeff Weiner.

There can be only one. Polling ends at 5 PM Pacific.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=155533&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Valleywag Hotties: Semifinals results]]> Only two Valleywag Hotties left, after...

Jim Buckmaster (52.2%) stared down George Zachary (47.8%).
Ben Trott (58.4%) gunned down Jeff Weiner (41.6%).

I'm sorry, Zachary fans. And I'm even more sorry to post this e-mail from "Charlie Schmidt":

In that latest picture of George Zachary- "Caught in a rare resting moment" should read something more like - "On his way to breakfast hungover, George has to stop and lean against the wall to prevent from falling over." At least that is my recollection of how that picture was taken.

But hey, he looked great doing it.

So, next up, the final face-off. The grisly semifinals record after the jump.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

hotties-bracket-semifinals.jpg

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=155517&view=rss&microfeed=true