<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, videoegg]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, videoegg]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/videoegg http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/videoegg <![CDATA[EMI sues Hi5 and VideoEgg for listening to EMI]]> Record label EMI may have tired of suing individual file sharers for copyright infringement. But a number of music-industry plaintiffs, all partners and subsidiaries of EMI, are suing social network Hi5 and advertising startup VideoEgg in New York Southern District Court for copyright infringement. According to the complaint [PDF]:

While each of the defendants has the right, ability and legal obligation to prevent infringement of plaintiffs’ copyrighted works, they have allowed infringement to go unchecked, content to profit handsomely from advertisements that appear side-by-side with infringing content.

What's particularly about the suit is that EMI's strategy seems to imply that because VideoEgg used technology like Audible Magic and human review to filter copyrighted content from the company's servers, it's more liable, not less.

No wonder YouTube took so long to install filtering software, which has long been demanded by rightsholder organization like the Recording Industry Association of America. In a prepared statement, VideoEgg argues the suit is without merit and asserts that it upheld the law under the DMCA:

VideoEgg has consistently worked to employ best practices to protect content owners. We took all the steps necessary to avoid copyright infringement issues, including systemwide deployment of Audible Magic, the leading provider of content identification services. Moreover, we have never received a takedown notice from EMI nor any of its affiliated companies.

Moreover, the company's deal to provide Hi5 with video uploading services for the social network's users ended in April, so it can not be accused of continuing to enable new cases of infringement. What's worrisome is that EMI is going after a company for doing exactly what the RIAA asked — pro-actively policing its network for infringement. And where's ostensibly tech-savvy former Googler Douglas Merrill in all of this? Somebody needs to explain to EMI's legal team how bad it looks trying to punish one of the companies actually doing their bidding.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5022071&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[4 things BusinessWeek won't tell you about its under-30 entrepreneurs]]> The problem with lists like BusinessWeek's collection of 13 under-30 entrepreneurs: Inevitably, in an effort to fill a demographic quota, editors scrape the bottom of the barrel. And presenting a balanced picture of these business novices cuts against the goal of serving up fresh faces. (Whether they're supposed to make BusinessWeek's 50something readers feel either young again or even older, I'm not quite sure.) Here are some things that BusinessWeek would just as soon you not know about members of its boy band:

  • Joe Green (top left) has raised $7.3 million for his Facebook application, Causes. Which would be more impressive had the funding not come from Peter Thiel's Founders Fund. Thiel is an investor in Facebook, and has a vested interest in creating the impression that Facebook appmakers are worth something.

  • Drew Houston (not pictured) runs a company, Dropbox, which offers online file storage, a service users can't get from anyone else. Except AOL, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo, and a good dozen other startups.

  • VideoEgg CEO Matt Sanchez (top, second from left) tried to compete with YouTube and failed. Or "evolved," as BusinessWeek put it, into an ad network for Flash games, a crowded field that so far has garnered VideoEgg gross revenues of $300,000 a month. The magazine lauded Sanchez for raising $27 million in venture funding; it should have asked instead how much is left.

  • RockYou cofounder Jia Shen (bottom left) launched his widget startup while working for another company, Iconix, according to IM chats produced in court. He and cofounder Lance Tokuda settled a lawsuit with iconix last year. They're now trying — so far unsuccessfully — to raise another round of venture funding, or sell the company.
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381591&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Competitor: YouTube's 2008 revenues will reach maybe $90 million]]> mikesanchez.jpgLast summer, VideoEgg CEO Matt Sanchez complained that Google ripped off his company's innovation when YouTube began selling ads that popped up along the bottom margin of videos while they played. Now Sanchez doesn't so much care. YouTube, he told NewTeeVee, is only going to earn revenues of about $70 million to $90 million in 2008. InVideo ads — the kind Sanchez claimed Google ripped off — will be an even smaller part of the pie. Bear Stearns estimated YouTube revenues will reach $103 million this year, $22.6 million from InVideo ads. The low numbers have Sanchez suddenly bearish on online video. He told NewTeeVee that if YouTube can't pull significant revenues, the market definitely isn't big enough for VideoEgg's aspirations. He's steering the company's resources into brokering advertising for casual Flash games instead, a market which is about as underhyped as online video was in 2007.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=375041&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Google is introducing "overlay" ads that...]]> The New York Times]]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=292038&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Loose Wires: So we have to wait longer for the Matrix]]>
  • Pew Internet releases its second Future of the Internet report. One finding: In the next 15 years, "Humans will remain in charge of technology." Oh good, I was afraid the Machines would take over. [Pew Internet]
  • Comic books, published on the web before they go to books! It's like webcomics only it gets in the New York Times! [NY Times]
  • Video sharing site VideoEgg launches an ad network today. As fellow snark blogger Eran Globen tells me, it's almost time for someone to invent TiVo for Internet video and scrap all the ads that we came here to escape in the first place. [Press Release]
  • UnFaced, a service that lets Facebook users spy on people checking out their profiles and run compatibility tests, gets some press, bringing it that much closer to a privacy lawsuit. [Daily Texan and UnFaced]
  • ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=203157&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Let's do launch: MacBook, AOL UnCut, G-Notebook, and Yahoo]]> Just so we all know what we're snarking this week, here's what the Big 3 5 7 plus or minus 2 are rolling out.

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=174219&view=rss&microfeed=true