<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, vonage]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, vonage]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/vonage http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/vonage <![CDATA[Internet telephone provider Vonage has reached...]]> Internet telephone provider Vonage has reached a settlement in its patent dispute with Nortel. Vonage won't pay for past damages, and both companies have agreed to a cross-licensing deal instead. The settlement ends the last of the company's pending legal battles with major telecom carriers and equipment makers. If the Internet telephone company has truly put its legal problems in its past — not a forgone conclusion — the company may now move on to address problems. Problems like providing reliable service at a profit. Oh yes, that. [Reuters]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=339208&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Jeff Pulver on 2008: "We get a life"]]>
"What will be the app in 2008?" videoblogger Florian Seroussi asks Jeff Pulver, the Internet-calling pioneer who founded the company that became Vonage. "Life," Pulver answers, "I think we get a life." Nice thought. I'll take that bet. Seroussi's follow-up question: "Life 2.0?"

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=338442&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Vonage isn't just facing service issues today....]]> Vonage isn't just facing service issues today. It's also been revealed that Nortel countersued the Internet telephone provider over a patent dispute. That makes four big telephone companies suing Vonage for patent infringement: AT&T, Sprint Nextel, Verizon, and now Nortel. The good news: At this rate, Vonage is running out of companies to get sued by. [News.com]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=334973&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[If a Vonage falls in the woods, does it make a sound?]]> Users of Vonage's internet telephone service have been reporting a major service failure, ongoing since Friday. The problems are varied, but it comes down to this: Vonage seems to be missing the "phone" and "service" parts of "phone service." In some cases, incoming calls are not connecting. Vonage is forwarding the attempted calls to subscriber landlines and cellphones, but repeatedly, and late. As a result, the call forwarding feature becomes a series of phantom calls clogging up the customer's only reliable phone service. Some are reporting no service at all.

An anonymous administrator of Vonage Forum, the independent discussion board where gripes were aired, reports that Vonage claims to have resolved the issue this morning, but users continue to report problems.

So why isn't the blogosphere taking notice as it did for the recent Skype outage? Despite Vonage's attempt to stay relevant with heavy advertising, the only ones who seem to care about the failing company are the numerous telephone carriers suing the company into the ground for patent infringement — and the suckers who bought into Vonage's late night television pitch.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=334855&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[At this point, does Vonage just exist to get sued?]]> Photo by Torbert TimsonAT&T is taking Vonage to court over patent infringements, just like everybody else. AT&T seeks an injunction, alleging Vonage infringed on a patent related to VOIP calls on standard telephone devices. Who knew there was anything left to gain from suing Vonage? Verizon and Sprint already had their way with the company when judges ruled in their favor in two prior suits. (Photo by Torbert Timson)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=313388&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Virgin Mobile IPO fails to pop]]> Some IPOs — like Google and VMWare—are impressive from the start. Others — like Vonage, which has fallen 85 percent since going public — fall flat. Virgin Mobile, with its cherry brand name and backers, should have had a sparkling debut. And yet it didn't.

Virgin Mobile, unlike the big carriers, rents a wireless network rather than owning one, essentially gussying up and reselling Sprint's service under its own name. It's a challenging business model, known in the trade as being a "mobile virtual network operator" or "MVNO." Disney and Amp'd, among others, have failed to make a go of it.

Renting one's network means lower capital costs, and according to the Wall Street Journal, Virgin has 4.83 million subscribers and actually made a small profit this year. Virgin Mobile has plenty of revenue, but with a flat IPO today and loads of debt, it is unclear if it can make itself into a viable company.

Disney Mobile shut down last month and Amp'd burned through hundreds of millions of dollars with nothing to show for it. History does not look good for Virgin, but with strong name recognition among their target market and clever advertising, we don't put it past Sir Richard to succeed where others have failed.

(Photo by AP/Jacques Brinon)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=309919&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Vonage, the Internet phone service, has found...]]> Vonage, the Internet phone service, has found itself besieged by more legal woes. A court has found it infringed on six Sprint Nextel patents, and ordered Vonage to cough up $69.5 million and a 5 percent royalty on future sales. Last March, Vonage suffered similar penalties after it was found guilty of infringing on Verizon patents. A royalty here, a royalty there, and soon you're talking serious money. [Silicon Alley Insider]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=303615&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bon voyage, Vonage!]]> The internet phone provider Vonage is hanging on for dear life, somehow fending off a Titanic-like doom. Hauled into court by Verizon, Vonage was found guilty of patent infringements. Although fined $58 million penalty and forced to abandon any infringing technology, the VOIP Internet-telephone service provider overturned a ruling that would have barred it from conducting business altogether. Not that it's conducting business in a particularly admirable manner.

It's currently in the midst of another lawsuit accusing the company of stealing and soliciting the customer base of the now defunct Internet phone service SunRocket, after negotiations to purchase SunRocket's subscriber base and other assets fell apart.

And now Vonage is hoping to attract new customers by rolling out a copycat version of the iPhone's helpful "visual voicemail" feature, which displays voicemails in a list rather than forcing subscribers to dial into a voicemail box. Vonage's version supposedly does Apple one better by actually translating the voicemails from voice to text. Unfortunately, it works about as well as the handwriting recognition did on Apple's Newton handheld. Allen Stern of CenterNetworks tested out the system. An invitation to lunch was translated as follows:

Hey. Elements bonds a chair and it's Oh new time on Wednesday.
Vonage continues to operate at a loss, and since signups of new subscribers dropped off during the second quarter. Vonage blames the drop on having "scaled back marketing expenditures to retool its marketing campaign." It looks like copying "visual voicemail," poorly, won't be a very good marketing point. With little else to distinguish itself from the VOIP phone service offered by the likes of Comcast and Time Warner, the question is changing from "How the heck is Vonage surviving?" to "How much time does it have?"]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=293765&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Vonage reports: Customers not duped]]> The Wall Street Journal opens a story with:

Vonage Holdings Corp. said customers have refused to pay for more than one million shares that they had signed up to buy in the Internet calling company's initial public offering in May.

Those million shares were worth $17.25 million when Vonage offered them in May, but the tanking stock now makes them worth less than $7 million. Meanwhile, Vonage just told the SEC that it doesn't plan to make a profit this year.

Vonage regrets not following its original plan, which was to sell customers a bucket of brine shrimp labeled "Sea Monkeys."

Vonage Customers Withhold Payment For IPO Shares [WSJ]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=191462&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Vonage orders the Surf 'n' Turf]]> Never order the Surf 'n' Turf. You want steak, or you want lobster. Order both — the priciest combo on the menu — and you're admitting you're a greedy jerk.

Vonage has gone and shopped itself around in the middle of its IPO process. Two months after filing to go public, rumors are flying that the VoIP provider, still in the red, is looking to get bought.

The real problem with Surf 'n' Turf is finishing it off. You don't want that smug waiter asking, "Shall I get you a doggie bag?" What could leave Vonage stuffed and red-faced, failing to pull off either the IPO or the buyout? Well, every layer of the VoIP game is getting crowded as a phone booth, the telecoms are fighting back with extra charges, and India's already dealing with pirate VoIP providers.

But hey, I'm sure they'll get by on their stellar customer service reputation.

V is for Vonage...T is for Takeover [CNN Money]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=164380&view=rss&microfeed=true