<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, vume]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, vume]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/vume http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/vume <![CDATA[YouTube starts paying losers for their clips]]>
It's not that people object to Google making money on YouTube, really. They just want their cut. Yesterday, YouTube opened a program which pays a portion of ad revenue to content creators to all comers. Well, all comers from the U.S. and Canada whom YouTube deems acceptable, that is. Rather than specifying who it will accept, YouTube suggests you keep applying if you've been rejected. That worked so well with Susie in the 8th grade, after all.

The policy just confirms what we always suspected was Google's attitude: Users are losers, and we know best. The Google-owned video site claims that channel partners who regularly produce videos with more than a million pageviews can earn "several thousand dollars per month," but those are few and far between. The real winner is Google, which continues to dominate the Internet video market, and now eliminates the small advantage held by rival upstarts Revver, VuMe, and Metacafe which have been touting their own loser-generated-content reward programs for some time.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=332397&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Revver shares a million in revenue with video producers]]> Revver revenueOnline video platform Revver announced it has paid out $1 million dollars to video producers from its ad revenue sharing program, just in time for its one year anniversary. That puts Revver's total revenue at around $2-$2.5 million, since it splits fees 50/50 after paying 20% to a distributor. Sounds great. But it doesn't prove that Revver has a sustainable, profitable model—not after the year it's had, losing key staff, being banned from MySpace, losing LonelyGirl15 and several other notable video producers like Ze Frank and Ask A Ninja, and a rumored buyout. Why?

Repeat after me: REVENUE IS NOT PROFIT. And Revver is competing in a sea of also-rans. VuMe and Metacafe also have producer reward programs, and DailyMotion and YouTube are about to launch their own programs. Lots of sites are about to start competing for the few uploads that will have money-making potential.

And it turns out that $1 million, impressive as it sounds, is not so great if you're a video producer, either. Since 25,000 producers have received some form of payout — making the average payout $40 total, as onlinevideoinsider points out in the comments — you are not talking about a living wage... more like a thank you for the traffic. Thousands more have not qualified for the minimum $20 payout yet. Success stories like Eepybird, the wacky "scientists" behind the Diet-Pepsi/Mentos videos, and Tim Street, producer of the salacious French maid TV, who are making a living wage from revenue-sharing are few and far between.

Until more producers can make more money from residuals, ad revenue sharing is just a gimmick. And until YouTube enters the game, Revver is just an experiment trying to reverse a year of bad news with a seemingly positive press release.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=299661&view=rss&microfeed=true