<![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, warner music group]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: valleywag, warner music group]]> http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/warnermusicgroup http://gawker.com/tag/valleywag/warnermusicgroup <![CDATA[Is Zappos.com getting into the music business?]]> Ethan Kaplan, Warner Bros.'s 29-year-old vice president of technology, uses Twitter like his cohorts. Well, almost like his cohorts. He slipped up using Twitter's direct-message feature, and broadcast to the Internet a request to talk to someone in business development at Zappos.com. Despite advertising "Shoes, shoes, shoes!" on its website, Zappos has branched out into selling everything from camping axes to computers. Could it be branching out into music, too? It's hard to think why Kaplan would want to talk to Zappos otherwise — unless he's figured out that the music industry doesn't have much of a future, and it's time to find a job at a more promising company.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5034921&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[What MySpace Music backers don't get: Recorded music is no longer a product, but advertising]]> Shawn "Jay Z" Carter signing with LiveNation demonstrates that one of the most entrepreneurial artists of our generation has decided that the business of recording music is advertising. The No. 1 digital music retailer, iTunes, has understood this for some time — Apple sells iPods, and iTunes is a service to make it relatively cheap and easy to fill those iPods. Carter will be happy to make a little chump change from digital sales, but the MC knows the real money is in branded events and merchandise. What the labels call "piracy" is actually free distribution of promotional material, and such a model is not without precedent.

It's called radio, and more recently, music videos. In both cases, record labels basically paid to promote album sales — either through payola, in the case of radio, or through seven-figure film budgets, in the case of music videos. The content itself was given away for free. Thankfully, digital tools make recording and mastering that much cheaper as well. The only change in thinking (and artist contracts) required is to see the recordings themselves as a loss leader for stuff you actually can sell, like tickets and T-shirts, fan club memberships and licensing rights.

The new MySpace Music, like industry-backed efforts with MusicNet, PressPlay and Bertelsmann's Napster, is doomed to failure because the labels persist in seeing recorded music as a profit center, not as a promotional platform for leveraging artists' brands. Of the four majors, only EMI hasn't signed on with that effort yet, and if former Googler Douglas Merrill has any sense, he'll tell the company not to bother. (Photo by AP/Peter Kramer)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376018&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Warner Music has signed a deal with 7digital.com...]]> Warner Music has signed a deal with 7digital.com to sell its entire catalog DRM-free in the U.K., Ireland, Germany, Spain and France. What's 7digital, you ask? An online music store that's not Apple's iTunes, which seems to be Warner's only requirement in a partner these days. [Crave]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=363733&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Qtrax spends $1 million to tout free online downloads — but record industry begs to differ]]> Qtrax.jpgFree P2P music service Qtrax launched at Cannes yesterday with the support of all four major labels: Warner, Universal, EMI and Sony BMG. Or so Qtrax claimed in its announcement, a star-laden extravaganza which reportedly cost $1 million. But Silicon Alley Insider reports that Warner, Universal, EMI, and Sony are only in negotiations with Qtrax and have not settled on final terms.

Best of all: Qtrax CEO Alan Klepfisz claimed he wasn't trying to mislead anyone: "We feel we have been unfairly crucified because a competitor tried to damage us." Klepfisz didn't name names, but we're reminded of Pogo: "We have met the enemy, and they are us."

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=349774&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Robert Scoble fails to change the world]]> Jason Calacanis and Dave Winer weren't the only ones lowering the Gnomedex geekathon's quest for spiritual uplift. Robert Scoble, the outspoken videoblogger, took issue with Warner Music digital guru Ethan Kaplan's critique of the conference. Not, mind you, for anything Kaplan said, but for his failure to address bigger issues that plague the real world. Scoble thinks that Kaplan is hypocritical for working for a record label that publishes a rapper with an "evil" no-snitching policy. As fellow Valleywag contributor Nick Douglas astutely points out in the comments, Scoble is saying that an employee is culpable for and complicit in any and all wrongdoings committed by an employer during his tenure at the company. It's an outlandish standard that Scoble himself couldn't meet at current employer PodTech, let alone previous paycheck-issuer Microsoft. But it's typical in displaying geek hubris. Sure, we can all change the world. Let's hold hands and blog!


The "no snitching" meme in hip-hop and urban culture has been in the wild for months, of course. Scoble only caught wind of it from a "60 Minutes" piece, replayed yesterday, that originally aired in April. Scoble reminds us that "60 Minutes" is "an important TV news show in USA" without observing that the Anderson Cooper piece may be the esteemed program's worst recent example of sensational journalism.

The entire story keys on Cam'ron, a hip-hop artist looking to revive his career and street cred after the foolish career move of festooning himself, his car, and his videos in the decidedly unmasculine color pink. Despite the claims of "60 Minutes," Cam'ron did not influence young black men to wear pink. The exact opposite occurred: young black men stopped buying Cam'ron albums. While the issue of white men making fortunes by marketing the ills of black, urban culture as glamorous to young white Americans is a real one, "60 Minutes" destroyed their own street cred by hooking the piece on Cam'ron, a figure entirely lacking in street influence.

Opposition to "snitching" is a sentiment that is deep-rooted and longstanding in the urban community. One rapper exploiting that sentiment does not influence youth; instead, Cam'ron's just trying to boost his own cred by playing into a reality that already exists. It was a reality long before Cam'ron; before the O.J. Simpson murder trial; even before Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale formed the Black Panther party. Warner carrying a foolish pop rapper like Cam'ron is not evil — it's just stupid.

Moreover, Scoble failed to do his research. After the airing, Cam'ron's publicity stunt backfired, predictably, and he retracted his statements and issued an apology:

In 2005, I was a victim of a violent crime. I was shot multiple times without provocation by two armed men who attempted to carjack my vehicle. Although I was a crime victim, I didn't feel like I could cooperate with the police investigation. Where I come from, once word gets out that you've cooperated with the police that only makes you a bigger target of criminal violence. That is a dark reality in so many neighborhoods like mine across America. I'm not saying its right, but its reality. And it's not unfounded. here's a harsh reality around violence and criminal justice in our inner cities."

But my experience in no way justifies what I said. Looking back now, I can see how those comments could be viewed as offensive, especially to those who have suffered their own personal tragedies or to those who put their lives on the line to protect our citizens from crime. Please understand that I was expressing my own personal frustration at my own personal circumstances. I in no way was intending to be malicious or harmful. I apologize deeply for this error in judgment.

This is why geeks shouldn't try to change the world. Nor should they be held accountable, as Scoble's trying to do to Kaplan, for not changing the world. They aren't equipped to. They are ignorant of the real world. They live narrow, insular lives defined by their monitor screen, a reality that has very little to do with the outside world. It's a world that they cannot learn about by searching Google, and a world they can't change by writing a blog post.]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=289007&view=rss&microfeed=true