Enter your username and password.
Compete, the website-measurement startup, announced that Microsoft had boosted its share of U.S. search queries by two-thirds from May to June. Microsoft's share is still small: It grew from 8.4 percent to 13.2 percent of the total market, largely at Google's expense. So how did it do it? The answer is simple: payola. Microsoft's Live Search Club offers prizes to search users. But other search engines have offered similar payoffs to spur traffic with far less dramatic results. Here's why Live Search Club is succeeding as a payola scheme — but failing as a business maneuver.
The payola scheme is transparent — and Microsoft's competitive advantage looks to be short-lived. Compete has already issued new results that subtract out the Live Search Club traffic. And industry insiders already understand that the results are not "real" search queries. The metrics firms will develop ways to factor out or block non-human bot and macro activity. If they can't, they'll simply eliminate all traffic deriving from Live Search Club.
And Microsoft appears to realize that its game was poorly designed. Vista, a pricey prize, has already been eliminated from the competition after Microsoft realized winners were reselling the licenses. Microsoft has also placed a cap on points earned per game.
Worst of all, the gaming venture has proved a distraction from Microsoft's real search gains. Factoring out the Live Search Club data, Microsoft's search share grew from 8.4 percent to 9.1 percent, a welcome increase after years of reverses. Instead, everyone's talking about how Microsoft tried — and failed — to game the search market.
Contact information for this author is not available.
Start a new discussion